Muhammad, Javid and Ghulam Fatima, Sharif (2013): Energy Consumption, Financial development and CO2 emissions in Pakistan. Forthcoming in: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_48287.pdf Download (753kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed the effects of financial development, per capita real income, the square of per capita real income, per capita energy consumption and openness on per capita CO2 emissions in the context of Pakistan during 1971-2011. The bound F-test for cointegration yielded evidence of a long-term relationship among these variables. The results confirm the existence of an environmental Kuznets curve in Pakistan for both the short and long term. This finding indicates that at the initial stage of development, the level of CO2 increases with income, and after some threshold level of income, this relationship may change from positive to negative as more efficient infrastructure and energy-efficient technology are implemented during the development of the country. The findings of this study also reveal a significantly positive sign for the coefficient of financial development, suggesting that financial development has occurred at the expense of environmental quality. The findings of this study indicate that the key contributing factors of carbon emissions in Pakistan are income, energy consumption and financial development. In addition, the openness variable has no significant influence on carbon emission in either the short or long term.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Energy Consumption, Financial development and CO2 emissions in Pakistan |
English Title: | Energy Consumption, Financial development and CO2 emissions in Pakistan |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | EKC; Energy; CO2 |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 48287 |
Depositing User: | Muhammad Javid |
Date Deposited: | 15 Jul 2013 13:32 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 12:21 |
References: | [1] Ozturk I, Acaravci A . CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 200; 14: 3220-3225. [2] De Bruyn S M, Opschoor J B. Developments in the throughput-income relationship: theoretical and empirical observations. Ecological Economics 1997; 20: 255-268. [3] Unruh GC, Moomaw WR.An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions. Ecological Economics 1998; 25: 221-229. [4] Friedl B, Getzner M. Determinants of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 2003; 37: 1156-1164. [5] Coondoo D, Dinda S. The carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecological Economics 2008; 65: 375-385. [6] Managi S, Jena P R. Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecological Economics 2008;65: 432-440. [7] Narayan P K, Narayan S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 2010; 38: 661-666. [8] Esteve V, Tamarit C. Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment between CO2 and income: The Environmental Kuznets Curve in Spain, 1857–2007, Energy Economics 2012; doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.03.001. [9] Panayotou T. Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. Working Paper WP238, Technology and Employment Programme, Geneva: International Labor Office 1993. [10] Suri V, Chapman D. Economic growth, trede and energy: implication for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 1998; 25: 195-208. [11]Soytas u, Sari R. Energy consumption and GDP: causality relationship in G 7 countries and emerging markets. Energy Economics 2003; 25: 33-37 [12] Soytas U, Sari R. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics 2009; 68:1667–75. [13] Halicioglu F. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 2009; 37: 1156-1164. [14] Zhang X-P, Cheng X-M. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics 2009; 68: 2706–2712. [15] Shahbaz M , Lean H H, Shabbir M S. Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 2012;16: 2947-2953. [16] Nasir M, Rehman F. Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 2011; 39: 1857–64. [17] Stern DI. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 2004; 32: 1419-39. [18] Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics 2004; 49: 431–55. [19] Frankel J, Romer D. Does trade cause growth? The American Economic Review 1999; 89:379-399. [20] Ozturk I, Acaravci A. The Long-Run and Causal Analysis of Energy, Growth, Openness and Financial Development on Carbon Emissions in Turkey, Energy Economics 2012; doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025 [21] Zhang Y-J. The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 2011; 39: 2197-2203. [22] Sadorsky P. The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 2010; 38: 2528-35 [23] Dasgupta S, Hang J H, Laplante B, Mamingi N. Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2001; 2: 310-335. [24] Dasgupta S, Hang J H, Laplante B, Mamingi N. Disclosure of environmental violations and stock market in the Republic of Korea. Ecological Economics 2006;58: 759-777. [25] Tamazain A, Rao B. Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economics. Energy Economics 2010; 32: 137-145. [26] Claessens S, Feijen E. Financial sector development and millennium development goals. World Bank Working Paper No. 89 2007. [27] Tamazian A , Chousa J P, Vadlamannati C. Does higher economics and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from the BRIC countries. Energy Policy 2009; 37: 246-253. [28] Jalil A, Feridun M. The impact of financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics 2012; 33: 284-291. [29]Husain I. Financial sector reforms in Pakistan. Paper read at Italy-Pakistan Trade and Investment Conference, Rome on September 28, 2004. [30] Jalil A, Ma Y. Financial evelopment and economic growth: time series evidence from Pakistan and China. Journal of Economic Cooperation 2008; 29: 29-68. [31] Khan MA. Financial development and economic growth in Pakistan: evidence based on autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. South Asia Economic Journal 2008; 9:375-390. [32] BPS Statistical Review of World Energy June 2012. [33] Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of levelrelationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2001; 16: 289–326. [34] Pesaran H M, Shin Y. Autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Storms, S. (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ranger Frisch Centennial Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1999. [35] Toda H Y, Philips PCB. Vector autoregrassions and causality. Econometrica 1993; 61:1367-1393. [36] Brown R L, Durbin J, Evans J M. Techniques for testing the consistency of regression relations over time. J.R. Stat. Coc. 1975;37: 149-192 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/48287 |