Blažo, Ondrej (2012): What Do Limitation Periods for Sanctions in Antitrust Matters Really Limit? Published in: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies , Vol. 5(7), No. 2012 (2012): pp. 79-103.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_48550.pdf Download (277kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Limitation periods represent a legal safeguard for a person who has once broken the law in order not to be put at risk of sanctions and other legal liabilities for an indefinite amount of time. By contrast, public interest can sometimes require that a person who has committed a serious breach of law cannot benefit from limitation periods and that it is necessary to declare that the law had indeed been infringed and that legal liability shall be expected irrespective of the passage of time. This article aims to answer the question whether limitation periods for sanctions attached to competition restricting practices by Slovak competition law also limit the powers of its competition authority to declare the illegality of illicit behaviour or to prohibit it. Although this question can arise, and has done so already, as a defence in antitrust proceedings, as well as the fact that an answer to this question can potentially, as well as actually, affect rights of undertakings which have broken competition rules, Slovak jurisprudence cannot be seen as explicit in answering this question.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | What Do Limitation Periods for Sanctions in Antitrust Matters Really Limit? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | competition law; antitrust procedure; sanctions; administrative responsibility; Slovakia; EU law; limitation period; criminal law; private enforcement; legal certainty; safeguards; powers of competition authority; European Commission |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law |
Item ID: | 48550 |
Depositing User: | Michał Mijal |
Date Deposited: | 24 Jul 2013 23:49 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:19 |
References: | Burda E., Čentéš J., Kolesár J., Záhora J., Trestný zákon. Všeobecná časť. Komentár. I. Diel [Penal Code. General Part. Commentary. Volume I], Praha 2010. Demčák P., ‘Pohľad a doterajšie skúsenosti Protimonopolného úradu SR’ [‘Overview and Experiences of the Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic’], [in:] Súkromnoprávne vymáhanie súťažného práva/Private Enforcement of the Competition Law, Collection of Papers from the International Conference, Bratislava 2010. Faull J., Nikpay A (eds.), The EC Law on Competition, 2nd edition, New York 2007. Kalesná K., Blažo O., Zákon o ochrane hospodárskej súťaže. Komentár [Act on Protection of Economic Competition. Commentary], Praha 2012. Machajová J., ‘Zodpovednosť vo verejnej správe’, [in:] P. Škultéty a kolektív, Správne právo hmotné, Všeobecná a osobitná časť, Bratislava 2000. Madleňáková L., ‘Probíhá v ČR řízení o uložení správních sankci a jejich ukládáni dle zásad Rady Evropy?’ [‘Is the administrative sanction process and sentencing of sanctions in the Czech Republic harmonious with principles of the Council of Europe?‘] (2010) XLIII(2) Správní právo. Ritter L., Braun W. D., Rawlinson F., EEC Competition Law. A Practitioner’s Guide, Deventer, Boston, 1991. Whish R., Competition Law. 6th Edition, Oxford 2008. Wils W. P. J., ‘The Increased Level of EU Antitrust Fines, Judicial Review, and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2010) 33(1) World Competition. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/48550 |