Determinants of farmers’ preference for adaptation strategies to climate change: evidence from north shoa zone of Amhara region Ethiopia

Mulatu Debalke, Negash (2011): Determinants of farmers’ preference for adaptation strategies to climate change: evidence from north shoa zone of Amhara region Ethiopia.

Abstract

Studies on climate change adaptation recognize the importance of agro-ecology based research for designing context-specific policies and programs to climate change. This study, therefore, applied a case-study approach to examine farmers’ preference for climate change adaptation strategies and the factors deriving their preference. Thus, households’ preference for five types of climate change adaptation strategies (multiple cropping, livestock, soil conservation, irrigation, and changing planting dates) is identified and the determinants of the preference are analyzed using Rank-Ordered Logit Model. The result shows that multiple cropping is the most preferred and frequently applied adaptation strategy to climate change, while livestock production is the least. The result also indicates that gender, age, farming experience and education level of the household head, household size, and farm and nonfarm income; farm size and farm distance to homestead; agricultural extension services and access to climate forecast information; farmers’ perceptions on long-term average temperature and rainfall affect farmers’ preference for the climate change adaptation strategies. Thus, policies and programs with the aim of reducing climate change impacts through adaptation need to consider important roles of these factors. The main barriers to climate change adaptation are lack of information or knowledge, shortage of money, shortage of land, and unsuitability of land and poor potential for irrigation. Although adaptation is one of the policy options for reducing the negative impacts of climate change, it is challenged by these constraints. Therefore, promoting investments and strengthening efforts to address these constraints is suggested to enhance farmers’ adaptation capacity and thus adaptation to climate change.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Climate change; Adaptation preference; Perception; Rank-Ordered Logit Model
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming

References

Asfaw A & Admassie A, 2004. The role of education on the adoption of chemical fertilizer under different socioeconomic environments in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics 30 (3): 215-228.

Deressa T, 2007. Measuring the economic impact of climate change on Ethiopian agriculture: Ricardian approach. World Bank Policy Research Paper 4342. World Bank, Washington, DC.

Deressa T, Hassen R, Alemu T, Yesuf M & Ringler C, 2009. Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Journal of Global Environmental Change:19, 248–255

Fok D, Paap P & Dijk BV, 2010. A rank-ordered logit model with unobserved heterogeneity in ranking capabilities, Journal of applied econometrics.

Fussel HM, 2007. Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustainability Science 2(2):265–275.

Hassan R & Nhemachena C, 2008. Determinants of African farmers’ strategies for adapting to climate change: Multinomial choice analysis. AfJARE 2(1).

Kato E, Ringler C, Yesuf M & Bryan E, 2009. Soil and water conservation technologies: A buffer against production risk in the face of climate change: Insights from the Nile Basin in Ethiopia. IFPRI Discussion Paper 871, Washington.

Koop G & Poirier DJ, 1994. Rank-Ordered Logit Models: An empirical analysis of Ontario voter preferences. Applied Econometrics9(4):369-388.

Kurukulasuriya P & Mendelsohn R, 2007. Crop selection: Adapting to climate change in Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4307, Sustainable Rural and Urban Development Team.

Long JS & Freese J, 2006. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Second edition. College Station, Stata Press.

Long JS, 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications, Inc.

Maddison D, 2007. The perception of and adaptation to climate change in Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4308, Sustainable Rural and Urban Development Team.

McFadden D, 1974. The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 3: 303–328.

Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus D and Shaw D, 1994. The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis. The American Economic Review 84(4):753-771.

MoFED, 2006. Building on progress: A plan for accelerated and sustained development to end poverty. Volume I, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

MoFED, 2010. Growth and transformation plan: 2010/11-2014/15. Volume I, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Nhemachena C & Hassan R, 2007. Micro-level analysis of farmers’ adaptation to climate change in Southern Africa. Discussion Paper 00714, Environment and Production Technology Division, IFPRI, Washington.

NMA, 2007. Climate change national adaptation programme of action of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Padilla AJ, McSorley C, Requejo A, Watson N & Williams M, 2003. Review of empirical methods for identifying and measuring switching costs, Economic Discussion Paper 5.

Seo N & Mendelsohn R, 2007. An analysis of crop choice: Adapting to climate change in South American farms. Ecological Economics 67:109–116.

STA, 2008. Shoa Robit town administration report.

USAID, 2007. Adapting to climate variability and change: A guidance manual for development planning. USAID, Washington, DC.

Verbeek M, 2008. A guide to modern econometrics. 3rd ed. Jhon Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

WFP, 2009. Mid-term evaluation of the Ethiopia country programme. Final report 10430, Office of Evaluation, World Food Programme.