Cebula, Richard (2010): A Preliminary Contemporary Panel Data Analysis of the Consumption Impact of Cigarette Taxation. Published in: Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice , Vol. 28, No. No. 1 (20 December 2010): pp. 69-89.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_49201.pdf Download (588kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The adverse effects from cigarette smoking account for an estimated 400,000 deaths annually in the U.S. Given this circumstance, the present study has two objectives. First, using a panel data-set for a very recent time frame, it seeks to investigate the impact of federal plus state cigarette excise taxes (along with a host of other factors) on the aggregate consumption of cigarettes. The study adopts a five-year state-level panel data-set spanning the period 2002 through 2006. Consistent with certain previous studies, the estimates in this study find that the higher the cigarette excise tax, the lower the aggregate volume of cigarettes consumed. The second objective of this study is to formally propose a general form/template for a cigarette excise tax that is tied directly to each cigarette brand's nicotine and tar content.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Preliminary Contemporary Panel Data Analysis of the Consumption Impact of Cigarette Taxation |
English Title: | A Preliminary Contemporary Panel Data Analysis of the Consumption Impact of Cigarette Taxation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | cigarette smoking per capita; cigarette excise taxation; nicotine and tar-based tax system |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue |
Item ID: | 49201 |
Depositing User: | Richard Cebula |
Date Deposited: | 21 Aug 2013 19:59 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 13:20 |
References: | Anderson, Lisa R. and Mellor, Jennifer M. (2008). “Predicting Health Behaviors with an Experimental Measure of Risk Preference,” Journal of Health Economics, 27(4):1260–74. Adda, Jerome and Cornaglia, Francesca. (2006). “Taxes, Cigarette Consumption, and Smoking Intensity,” The American Economic Review, 96 (4): 1013-28. Cebula, R.J.; Smith, K.E.; and Alexander, G.M. (2010). “The Impact of State Cigarette Taxes on Cigarette Consumption: Recent Evidence,” State Tax Notes, 56 (26): 2143-50. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). “Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,” http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5745a3.htm Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). “Health, United States, 2009,” http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus09.pdf Chaloupka, Frank J. and Warner, Kenneth. E. (2000). “The Economics of Smoking,” in Anthony J. Culver and Joseph P. Newhouse, eds., Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland: 1539-627. Chiles, T.W., and Sollars, D.L. (1993). “Estimating Cigarette-Tax Revenue,” Journal of Economics and Finance, 17 (3): 1-15. Cox, R.A. (2010). “”Will High Taxes Make Smokers Quit?” State Tax Notes, 56 (13): 1005-6. Drayton, William. (1972). “The Tar and Nicotine Tax: Pursuing Public Health Through Tax Incentives,” The Yale Law Review, 81 (8): 1487-1516. Evans, William N. and Farrelly, Matthew C. (1998). “The Compensating Behavior of Smokers: Taxes, Tar, and Nicotene,” RAND Journal of Economics, 29 (3): 578-95. Farrelly, Matthew C.; Nimsch, Christian T.; Hyland, Andrew; and Cummings, K. Michael. (2004). “The Effects of Higher Cigarette Prices on Tar and Nicotine Consumption in a Cohort of Adult Smokers,” Health Economics, 13 (1): 49-58. Forster, Martin and Jones, Andrew M. (2001). “The Role of Tobacco Taxes in Starting and Quitting Smoking: Duration and Analysis of British Data,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 164 (3): 517-47. Gine, Xavier; Karlan, Dean; and Zinman, Jonathan. (2010). “Put Your Money Where Your Butt Is: A Commitment Contract for Smoking Cessation,” America Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2 (4): 213-35. Holt, Charles A., and Laury, Susan K. (2002). “”Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects,” The American Economic Review, 92 (5): 1644-55. Kennedy, P. (2003). A Guide to Econometrics, 5th ed., Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. Koch, James V. (1992). "A Note on Smoking Health Costs and Public Policy," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 41 (2): 159-60. Lien, Diana S. and Evans, William N. (2005). “Estimating the Impact of Large Cigarette Tax Hikes: The Case of Maternal Smoking and Infant Birth Weight,” The Journal of Human Resources, 40 (2): 373-92. Lovenheim, M.F. (2008). “How Far to the Border? The Extent and Impact of Cross-Border Casual Cigarette Smuggling,” National Tax Journal, 61 (1): 7-32. Meier, K.J., and Licari, M.J. (1997). “The Effect of Cigarette Taxes on Cigarette Consumption,” American Journal of Public Health, 87 (7): 1126-30. O’Connor, R.J; Norton, K.J.; Bansal-Travers, M.; Mahoney, M.C.; Cummings, K.M.; and Borland, R. (2011). Harm Reduction Journal, 8 (1): 1-8. Showalter, M.H. (1998). “The Effect of Cigarette Taxes on Cigarette Consumption,” American Journal of Public Health, 88 (7): 1118-9. Thun, Michael J.; Lally, Cathy A.; Flannery, John T.; Calle, Eugenia E.; Flanders, W. Dana; and Heath, Clark W. Jr. (1997). “Cigarette Smoking and Changes in the Hystopathology of Lung Cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89 (21): 1580-86. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2004). The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Smoking and Health. http://www/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/sgr_2004/index.htm U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Women and Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General. http://www/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/sgr_2001/index.htm White, Halbert. (1980). “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test For Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica, 48 (4): 817-38. White, Nicola M. (2010). “New York Governor Approves Highest Cigarette Tax in Nation,” State Tax Notes, 56 (13): 1007. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49201 |