Palma, Nuno (2007): History of Economics or a Selected History of Economics?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_5111.pdf Download (547kB) | Preview |
Abstract
While research on the history of economics can be important to modern economics, the work of historians of economics is more often than reasonable associated with either non-contemporary or heterodox issues. I provide quantitative evidence of this, by analyzing the publications in the three main history of economics journals over the last fourteen years (1993-2006). This trend must change if the work of historians of economics is to be taken seriously by mainstream economists.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Northwestern University |
Original Title: | History of Economics or a Selected History of Economics? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | History of Economics |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General |
Item ID: | 5111 |
Depositing User: | Nuno Palma |
Date Deposited: | 02 Oct 2007 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 09:50 |
References: | Arrow, K. (2001). The Five Most Significant Developments in Economics of the Twentieth Century. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 8:3, pp. 298-304. Backhouse, R. (2003). The Stabilization of Price Theory, 1920-1955. In A Companion to the History of Economic Thought, Blackwell, ed. Samuels, Biddle, and Davis. Blanchard, O. (2000). What Do We Know About Macroeconomics that Fisher and Wicksell Did Not? Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 115:4, pp. 1375-1409. Blaug, M. (2001). No History of Ideas Please, We’re Economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.15:1, pp. 145-164. Boulding, K. (1971). After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith? History of Political Economy, 3:2, pp. 225-237. Hoover, K. (1988). The New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sceptical Inquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Leijonhufvud, A. (2006). The Uses of the Past. Working Paper, University of Trento. Lodewijks, J. (2003). Research in the History of Economic Thought as a Vehicle for the Defence and Criticism of Orthodox Economics. In A Companion to the History of Economic Thought Blackwell, ed. Samuels, Biddle, and Davis. Louçã, F. (2004). Swinging All the Way: The Education of Doctor Lucas and Foes. History of Political Economy, 36:4. McCloskey, D. (1998). The Rhetoric of Economics. Wisconsin University Press, 2nd Edition. Moscati, I. (2008). More Economics, Please: We’re historians of economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, this issue. Robbins, L. (1932). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 1st Edition, London: Macmillan. Santayana, G. [1980 (originally published 1905)]. The Life of Reason: or, the Phases of Human Progress. Volume 1, Reason in Common Sense. Dover. Samuelson, P. and W. Barnett (2007). Inside the Economist’s Mind: Conversations with Eminent Economists. Blackwell. Sent, Esther-Mirjam (1999). The Randomness of Rational Expectations: A Perspective on Sargent's Early Incentives. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 6:3, pp. 439-471. Schabas, M. (1992). Breaking Away: History of Economics as History of Science. History of Political Economy 24: 187–203. Weintraub, E. (2002). Will Economics Ever Have a Past Again? History of Political Economy, 34, Annual Supplement, pp. 1-14. Weintraub, E. (2006). Economic Science Wars. Jérome A. Blanqui Lecture. Available at http://www.eshet.net/best/1150129153__blanqui_lecture.pdf Weintraub, E. (2007). Economic Science Wars. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 29:3, 267 - 282 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/5111 |