Seri, Paolo and Bianchi, Annaflavia and Matteucci, Nicola (2013): Diffusion and usage of public e-services in Europe: An assessment of country level indicators and drivers.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_51240.pdf Download (734kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We analyze the state of the art of indicators on eGovernment, eHealth, eProcurement and ePartecipation. We survey the main methodological properties of these indicators, and uncover the principal stylized facts and trends; at the same time, we highlight their heuristic limits and potential inconsistencies. Finally, we address empirically the issue of the explanation of the indexes scores – i.e. how the supply of the various eServices in each country is affected by political, institutional and socio-economic differences, and is followed by actual usage. The econometric analysis uncovers the importance of broadband penetration and higher education as drivers for most of the types of eServices and users (citizens and businesses). Moreover, a corruption-free and agile public sector shows up to be an important pre-condition for more effective supply and usage. Despite severe data limits and the complexity of the underlying diffusion phenomena, our study of eServices availability and usage across European countries is a first empirical contribution aimed at disentangling broad empirical trends – with their correlates - from unresolved methodological issues. As such, this work appears useful to inform the policy debate and practice, in a phase characterized by a prospective reorientation of public eServices provision.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Diffusion and usage of public e-services in Europe: An assessment of country level indicators and drivers |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | eGovernment; eHealth; eProcurement; eParticipation; Europe; diffusion; drivers; comparative analysis |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 51412 |
Depositing User: | Dr Paolo Seri |
Date Deposited: | 14 Nov 2013 20:02 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 22:21 |
References: | Arduini, D., Belotti, F., Denni, M., Giungato, G., Zanfei, A. (2010). Technology Adoption and Innovation in Public Services. The Case of e-Government in Italy. Information Economics and Policy, 22(3), 257-75. Arduini, D., Denni, M., Lucchese, M., Nurra, A., Zanfei, A. (2013). The Role of Technology, Organization and Contextual Factors in the Development of E-Government Services: An Empirical Analysis on Italian Local Public Administrations. Forthcoming on Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Azad, B., Faraj, S., Goh, J.M., Feghali, T. (2010). What Shapes Global Diffusion of e-Government: Comparing the Influence of National Governance Institutions. Journal of Global Information Management, 18(2), 85-104. Bannister, F. (2007). The Curse of the Benchmark: An Assessment of the Validity and Value of E-Government Comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 171−188. Boyle, D. (2002), The Sum of Our Discontent, Texere:New York. Carbo, T., Williams, J. G. (2004). Models and Metrics for Evaluating Local Electronic Government Systems and Services. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2(3), 95 - 104. Cline, R. J. W., Haynes, K. M. (2001). Consumer Health Information Seeking on the Internet: the State of the Art. Health Education Research, 16 (6), 671-92. European Commission - Capgemini, (2010), Method paper 2010. Preparing the 9th Benchmark Measurement, June. Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2011). The Impact of e-Government Promotion in Europe: Internet Dependence and Critical Mass. Policy & Internet, 3(4), 1–29. Ford, G.S. (2011). Broadband Expectations and the Convergence of Ranks. Telecommunications Policy, 35(3), 213-219. Gualmini, E. (2008). Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy: Comparing Managerial Reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration, 86, 75–94 Hardy, C.A., Williams, S.P. (2011). Assembling E-Government Research Designs: A Transdisciplinary View and Interactive Approach. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 405-13. Heeks, R., Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing E-Government Research: Perspectives, Philosophies, Theories, Methods, and Practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243–265. Helbig, N., Ramón Gil-García, J., Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the Complexity of Electronic Government: Implications from the Digital Divide Literature, Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89-97, Irani, Z., Love, P.E.D., Elliman, T., Jones, S., Themistocleous, M. (2005). Evaluating e-government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 61-82. Janssen, D., Rotthier, S., Snijkers, K. (2004). If You Measure it They Will Score: An Assessment of International eGovernment Benchmarking. Information Polity, 9(3-4), 121–30. Jun, K.-N., Weare, C. (2011). Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 495-519. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: A Summary of Methodology, Data and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. Kim C.-K. (2007). A Cross-national Analysis of Global E-government, Public Organization Review, 7(4), 317-329 36 Krishnan, S., Teo, T.S.H. (2012), Moderating Effects of Governance on Information Infrastructure and E-Government Development, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (10), 1929-46. Kunstelj, M., Vintar, M. (2004). Evaluating the Progress of E-Government Development: A Critical Analysis. Information Polity, 9, 131−148. Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. Routledge: London. Lee, C.-p., Chang, K., Berry, F. S. (2011). Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444-54. Lowndes, V., Wilson, D. (2003). Balancing Revisability and Robustness? A New Institutionalist Perspective on Local Government Modernization. Public Administration, 81(2), 275-98. Matteucci, N. (2009). Interoperability Provision in Next Generation Communications: The Case of Italian DTV. Info, 11(6), 30 – 50 Matteucci, N. (2013). Lo stato della banda larga in Italia: statistiche, modelli diffusivi e implicazioni di policy. L'Industria (n.s.), XXXIV(1),11-60. Medaglia, R. (2012). eParticipation Research: Moving Characterization Forward (2006–2011), Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 346-360. Melitski, J., Holzer, M., Kim, S., Kim, C., Rho, S. (2005). Digital Government Worldwide: A e-Government Assessment of Municipal Web Sites. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 1(1), 1-18. Moon, M. J. (2002), “The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?”, Public Administration Review, 62, 424–33. Moon, M. J., Welch, E.W., Wong, W. (2005). What Drives Global E-governance? An Exploratory Study at a Marco Level. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'05). Norris, D.F., Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? Public Administration Review 65(1), 64-75. OECD (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and User guide. http://www.oecd.org/std/leadingindicatorsandtendencysurveys/42495745.pdf Osimo, D. (2008). Benchmarking Egovernment in the Web 2.0 Era: What to Measure, and How. European Journal of ePractice, 4. 37 Panozzo, F. (2000). Management by Decree: Paradoxes in the Reform of the Italian Public Sector. Scandinavian Journal of Management 16, 357–73. Rogers E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed), Free Press:New York Rorissa. A., Demissie, D., Pardo, T. (2011). Benchmarking E-Government: A Comparison of Frameworks for Computing E-Government Index and Ranking. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 354–62. Rowley J. (2011). e-Government Stakeholders - Who Are They and What Do They Want?. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 53-62. Salem, F. (2007). Benchmarking the e-Government Bulldozer: Beyond Measuring the Tread Marks. Journal of Measuring Business Excellence, 11(4), 9-22. Seri, P., Zanfei, A. (2012). “The Co-evolution of ICT, Skills and Organization in Public Administrations: Evidence from New European Country-level Data”. Forthcoming on Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 27 - December 2013, pp. 160-176. Siau, K., Long, Y. (2009). Factors Impacting E-Government Development. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 98–107. Snijkers, K. (2004), Digital Administration and the Role of Trust. Information Polity 9(3-4), 205-15. Susha I., Grönlund, A. (2012). eParticipation Research: Systematizing the Field, Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 373-382. Taipale, S. (2013). The Use of E-Government Services and the Internet: the Role of Socio-Demographic, Economic and Geographical Predictors. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4/5), 413–22. UN-DESA (2010). E-Government Survey 2010. Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis. UN: New York. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan038851.pdf Yildiz, M. (2007). E-Government Research: Reviewing the Literature, Limitations, and Ways Forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665. West, D. (2007). “Global Perspectives on E-Government”. In: Mayer-Schönberger, V., Lazer, D. (Eds.). Governance and Information Technology: From Electronic Government to Information Government, MIT Press: Cambridge (MA). 38 Whitmore A. (2012). A Statistical Analysis of the Construction of the United Nations E-Government Development Index, Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 68-75. Wooldridge, D.J.M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press: Cambridge. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/51412 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Diffusion and usage of public e-services in Europe: An assessment of country level indicators and drivers. (deposited 06 Nov 2013 03:50)
- Diffusion and usage of public e-services in Europe: An assessment of country level indicators and drivers. (deposited 14 Nov 2013 20:02) [Currently Displayed]