Defining and Measuring Metropolitan Regions: a rationale

Freeman, Alan and Cheshire, Paul (2006): Defining and Measuring Metropolitan Regions: a rationale.

Abstract

This paper was presented an OECD working group of city measurement, in Paris, in November 2006. It presents the rationale for, and a method for measuring, the ‘Functional Urban Region’ of London which establishes an estimate of its true economic extent, independent of its actual or historical boundaries.

Noting that there is no consistent definition of the boundaries of ‘economic’ London, and that different suppliers of data work on the basis of definitions that not only conflict, but produce inconsistent and widely different data about London, it applies the FUR-based method developed by the GEMACA group for defining and measuring cities. This system, similar to the SMSA system employed in the USA by the Office of Management and Budget, calculates a core, defined either as a densely populated area or an area with a high job density, and a ‘commuting field’ containing people that regularly travel into or communicate with the core for economic purposes, principally work.

It differs from the Urban Audit system in use at the time that this paper was presented, insofar as the UA system uses a mix of administratively defined cores and economically defined commuting fields, and varies the parameters used for both in accordance with local views, leading to a lack of comparability.

The paper exhibits the effect of various choices for defining the core and commuting field, and shows that the population of London in 2000 lay somewhere between 12,250,000 and 13,920,000. The final choice of parameters – and the eventual estimate of population – should pay due regard to issues of international compatibility, but the method itself is eminently practical.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: City; global city; Functional Urban Region; Larger Urban Zone; Territorial Indicators; Metropolitan Region; pluralism
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General

References

Department of the Environment and Government Office for London 1996, Four World Cities: a Comparative Study of London, Paris, New York and Tokyo, London, Llewelyn-Davies

Eurostat 2003, European Regional Statistics: Reference Guide, Brussels, Eurostat

Freeman, A. Measuring and Comparing World Cities. GLA Economics Working Papers 1. London: GLA [http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18103/1/MPRA_paper_18103.pdf]

Friedman, J. 1986, The World City Hypothesis, Development and Change 17, 69-84

Geddes, P. 1915, Cities in Evolution, London, Williams and Norgate

Hall, P. 1966, The World Cities, New York, McGraw-Hill

HM Treasury 2003, Pre-Budget Report 2003, London, HM Treasury

HM Treasury 2004, Pre-Budget Report 2004, London, HM Treasury

LPAC 1991, London: World City Moving into the 21st Century, London, HMSO

Parkinson, M., M. Hutchings, J. Simmie, G. Clark and H. Verdonk 2004, Competitive European Cities: Where do the Core Cities Stand? A report to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, ODPM

Sassen, S. 1991, The Global City – London, New York, Tokyo, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press

Sassen, S. 2000, Cities in a World Economy, Pine Forge, Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi

GAWC http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/ is the home page of the Globalisation and World Cities Study group (GAWC), a research project managed by the Geography Department at Loughborough University, contains much useful information and many valuable links. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/citylist.html contains links to the official home pages run by most major world cities.