The Deadweight Loss of Diwali

Waknis, Parag and Gaikwad, Ajit (2006): The Deadweight Loss of Diwali.

Abstract

Using a survey sample of students from a business school in India, we conduct an empirical analysis of different aspects of gift giving on the occasion of Diwali in lines with a similar analysis for Christmas in Waldfogel (1993). Based on simple OLS regression analysis, we find that accessories and electronic goods have higher yield compared to other kinds of gift items. Also, closer the relation and/ or lesser the age difference between the person gifting and the receiver lesser is the deadweight loss. This suggests that these gift givers are more capable of guessing the preferences of the gift receiver than others. We, however, did not find any systematic difference in valuation of gifts by gender of the recipients.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: deadweight loss, gift giving, efficiency of exchange, diwali
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis

References

Angrist Joshua and Jorn-Stephen Pischke, Mostly Harmless Econometrics, Princeton University Press, 2008.

Kolm Serge-Christophe and Jean Mercier Ythier, Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity: Foundations, Elsevier, 2006.

Waldfogel Joel, The Deadweight Loss of Christmas, The American Economic Review, Vol.83, No.5, Dec. 1993, 1328-1336.

Waldfogel J, Does Consumer Irrationality Trump Consumer Sovereignty? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005, vol. 87, issue 4, pages 691-696

Waldfogel J, Scroogenomics, Princeton University Press, 2009.

Greene W H, Econometric Analysis, Pearson, 2000

Knetsch, Jack l. and J.A Sinden, “Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(1984), 507-521

The aggro of the agora, The Economist, January 12, 2006