Notten, Geranda and Neubourg, Chris de (2007): Relative or absolute poverty in the US and EU? The battle of the rates.
Download (208kB) | Preview
US poverty is much higher than poverty in Europe when a relative poverty measure is used. Using an absolute poverty measurement method, the picture looks different: poverty in some European countries is higher. This paper estimates poverty rates for all the countries of the (old) EU and the USA applying the official measurement methods of the United States (absolute) and the European Union (relative) to all the countries. The differences in poverty levels, both in time and between the 16 countries are analysed, identifying the various sources for the variance in the figures. Using annual data of the EU and the US from 1994 to 2001, we illustrate how some differences in poverty levels are inherent to the choice for an absolute or a relative approach, while other differences are related to aspects common to both absolute and relative poverty measurement but working out differently depending on the estimation method used. The results of our analysis point out that using a single figure is often misleading.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University|
|Original Title:||Relative or absolute poverty in the US and EU? The battle of the rates|
|Keywords:||poverty; absolute; relative; United States; European Union|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
|Depositing User:||Geranda Notten|
|Date Deposited:||15. Oct 2007|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 02:01|
Alesina, A. and E.L. Glaeser (2004), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe; a World of Difference, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Atkinson, T., B. Cantillon, E. Marlier and B. Nolan (2002), Social Indicators; The EU and Social Inclusion, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Butrica, B.A. and R.V. Burkhauser (1997), Estimating Federal Income Tax Burdens for Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) Using the National Bureau of Economic Research TAXSIM Model, Maxwell Center for Demography and Economics of Aging, Syracuse University, New York, 13244-1020.
Burkhauser, R.V., B.A. Butrica, M.C. Daly and D.R. Lillard (December 2000), The Cross-National Equivalent File: A Product of Cross-National Research, Soziale Sicherung in Einer Dynamischen Gesellschaft (Social Insurance in a Dynamic Society), Irene Becker, Notburga Ott, and Gabriele Rolf (Eds.), Festschrift fuer Richard Hauser zum 65. Geburtstag (Papers in Honour of the 65th Birthday of Richard Hauser).
Castles, I. (1996), Review of the OECD-Eurostat PPP Program, STD/PPP(97)5, Economic Studies Branch, Paris, France, OECD.
Citro, C. and R. Michael (1995), Measuring Poverty: a New Approach, Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Duclos (2006) J. and A. Araar, Poverty and Equity; Measurement, Policy and Estimation with DAD, Springer, New York.
Euro Panel Users Network (July 2004), ECHP user Guide, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, available online on http://epunet.essex.ac.uk/ECHP_USER_GUIDE_06-07-2004b.pdf (retrieved August 2005).
Eurostat (2003), Construction of weights in the ECHP, DOC. PAN 165/2003-06, available online on http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/dsis/echpanel/library?l=/user_ db&vm=detailed&sb=Title (retrieved August 2005).
Eurostat (2003), ECHP UBD Description of Variables, DOC. PAN 166/2003-12, available online on http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/dsis/echpanel /library?l=/user_db&v m=detailed&sb=Title (retrieved August 2005).
Eurostat (2002), Imputation of Income in the ECHP, DOC. PAN 164/2002-12, available online on http://forum.europa.eu.int/Public/irc/dsis/echpanel/library?l=/user_db&v m=detailed&sb=Title (retrieved August 2005).
Eurostat (2003), ‘Laeken’ Indicators; Detailed Calculation Methodology, Working Group Statistics on Income, Poverty and Social Exclusion, DOC. E2/ISPE/2003, available online on http://forum.europa.eu.int/Members/irc/dsis/soipase/home (retrieved August 2005).
Feenberg, D. and E. Coutts (1993), An Introduction to the TAXSIM Model, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(1), pp. 189-194.
Fischer, G.M. (1992), The Development of the Orshansky Poverty Thresholds and Their Subsequent History as the Official U.S. Poverty Measure, partially revised 1997, available online on http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/povmeas/papers/orshansky.html (retrieved August 2005).
Förster, M. and M.M. d’Ercole (2005), Selection of Figures: Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s, OECD Social, Employment and Migration, Working Paper, 22, available online on www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers (retrieved August 2005).
Foster, J., Greer, J. and E. Thorbecke (1984), A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures, Econometrica, 52, pp.761-65.
Gottschalk, P. and T. Smeeding (2000), Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), pp.633-687.
Gouskova, E. and R. Schoeni (2002), Comparing Estimates of Family Income in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics and the March Current Population Survey, 1968-1999, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Hulme, D., and A. Shepherd (2003), Conceptualizing Chronic Poverty, World Development, 31(1), pp. 403-423.
Internal Revenue Service (2002), Participation in the Earned Income Tax Credit Program for Tax Year 1996, performed by SBSE Research, Research Project 12.26, Greensboro (NC), available online on http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/ papers/irs_eitc.pdf.
Lillard, D.R., M. Grabka and S. Freidin, Codebook for the Cross-National Equivalent File 1980-2005 BHPS – GSOEP – HILDA – PSID – SLID, part 1 and 2, Cornell University and DIW Berlin, available online on http://www.human.cornell.edu/che/PAM/Research/ Centers-Programs/German-Panel/cnef.cfm.
O’Boyle, E.J. (1999), Toward an Improved Definition of Poverty, Review of Social Economy, 57(3).
Oxley H., T.T. Dang, M. Förster, M. Pellizari (2000), Income Inequalities and Poverty among Children and Households with Children in selected OECD Countries: Trends and Determinants, in K. Vleminckx and T.M. Smeeding (eds), Child Well-Being, Child Poverty and Child Policy in Modern Nations, The Policy Press, Bristol.
Ravallion, M. and S. Chen (2003), Measuring Pro-poor Growth, Economic Letters 78, pp. 93-99.
Ravallion, M. (1994), Poverty Comparisons, Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics, 56, Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH.
Rendtel, U., L. Nordberg, M. Jäntti, J. Hanisch and E. Basic (January 2004), Report on Quality of Income Data, the Change from Input Harmonization to Ex-post Harmonization in the National Samples of the European Community Household Panel – Implications on Data Quality (CHINTEX), Chintex working paper, 21.
Schreyer, P. and F. Koechlin (2002), Purchasing Power Parities – Measurement Issues, Statistics Brief, 3, OECD, Paris.
Soede, A. (August 2006), Naar een Nieuwe Armoedegrens? Basisbestedingen als Maatstaf voor een Tekortschietend Inkomen (Towards a New Poverty Line? Basic Expenditures as a Benchmark for Insufficient Income), Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (SCP), The Hague.
Smeeding, T.M. (2005), Poor People in Rich Nations: The United States in a Comparative Perspective, Luxembourg Income Studies Working Paper, 419.
Smeeding, T.M., L. Rainwater and G. Burtless (2000), United States Poverty in a Cross-National Context, Luxembourg Income Studies Working Paper, 244.
Smeeding, T.M. and K. Ross (1997), Financial Poverty in Developed Countries: The Evidence from LIS, Luxembourg Income Studies Working Paper, 155.
Yong-Seong, K. and F. Stafford (2000), The Quality of PSID Income Data in the 1990’s and Beyond, available on http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/Guide/Quality/q_inc_data.html (retrieved March 2006).
US Census Bureau (June 2005), Alternative Poverty Estimates in the United States: 2003, US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington DC, http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-227.pdf (accessed April 2007).