Bagchi, Sagnik and Bhattacharyya, Surajit and Narayanan, Krishnan (2014): Does Anti-dumping Enforcement Generate Threat? Published in: Foreign Trade Review , Vol. 49, No. 1 (10 February 2014): pp. 31-44.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_53627.pdf Download (408kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The last two decades have witnessed that countries across the world are guided by the rules and regulations of multilateral trading institutions (for example, World Trade organization [WTO], International Monetary Fund [IMF]) in order to promote free and fair trade through gradual reduction in trade barriers. The World economy has noticed significant reduction in tariffs, yet we find a rise in non-tariff barriers (NTBs). However, we still find dumping and few other trade strategies of the exporting countries as a major hindrance to free and fair trade. Such behaviour has led to “contingent protection” as a tool of new-protectionism. Among the contingent protection measures, anti-dumping (AD) has evolved as the most popular choice of strategy for the trading nations. The AD policy invokes a threat to the exporter and thereby can change its strategic behaviour. We describe the phenomenon of dumping through a price-leadership model and thereby compute the optimal level of anti-dumping duty that can offset dumping. Using a sequential game, we conclude that the credible threat of an AD duty restricts dumping and thereby leads to a win-win situation for both the foreign and domestic firms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does Anti-dumping Enforcement Generate Threat? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Price-leadership, Dumping, Anti-dumping duty, Sequential game |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L40 - General |
Item ID: | 53627 |
Depositing User: | Bagchi Sagnik |
Date Deposited: | 12 Feb 2014 14:52 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 19:07 |
References: | Bekker, D. (2006). “The Strategic Use of Anti-dumping in International Trade”, South Africa Journal of Economics, Vol. 74(3), pp. 501-21. Finger, M. J. (1993). Reform. In J. M. Finger (Eds.), Antidumping: How It Works And Who Gets Hurt (pp. 57-79). The University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor. Prusa, J. T. (2001). “On the Spread and Impact of Anti-dumping”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 34(3), pp. 591-611. Reitzes, D. J. (1993). “Antidumping Policy”, International Economic Review, Vol. 34(4), pp. 745-63. Tivig, T. and U. Walz. (2000). “Market Share, Cost-Based Dumping, and Anti-Dumping Policy”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 33(1), pp. 69-86. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/53627 |