Pension policy design: The core issues

Aaron George, Grech (2014): Pension policy design: The core issues.

Abstract

The last two decades have been characterised by significant changes in national pension arrangements. While at first, a consensus seemed to be evolving around a one-size-fits-all reform, more recently the trend has been towards a better customisation of reforms. This paper reviews this process, focusing on five pension policy design issues. These are how policymakers have sought to optimise poverty alleviation effectiveness; the redefinition of the state’s role in smoothing incomes over the life-course; the balancing of contributions to benefits; adjusting the system to be more responsive to demographic, economic and social changes; and ensuring that reforms will be long-lasting.

While the role of state pensions still appears to be on a diminishing path, there has been a growing realisation of the need to ensure that they remain adequate. This has led to the setting up of innovative minimum pension schemes and credits for periods of childcare and unemployment. The expanding role of private pensions has also led governments to intervene more in their operation. Policymakers have shown strong interest in automatic adjustment mechanisms, to try to bring about required economic changes. However there is greater understanding that for the latter to happen, the state has to engage more with its citizens. While changes in pension systems can help societies respond to the ageing transition, for instance by removing incentives to retire too early or by aligning better the generosity of benefits to contributions made, there will need to be a much broader policy response.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social Security and Public Pensions; Retirement; Poverty; Retirement Policies
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J26 - Retirement ; Retirement Policies

References

Barr, N. (2000). Reforming pensions: Myths, truths and policy choices. IMF Working Paper WP/00/139. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Barr, N. (2013). The pension system in Sweden. Stockholm: Ministry of Finance.

Barr, N. & Diamond, P. (2006). “The economics of pensions”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1):15-39.

Barr, N. & Diamond, P. (2008). Reforming pensions: principles and policy choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0047279497005059.

Caucutt, E., Cooley, T. & Guner, N. (2007). The farm, the city and the emergence of social security, NBER Working Paper No.12854. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Chlon-Dominczak, A. (2000). Pension reform and public information in Poland. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No.19. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

De Graaf, W., Maier, R. & Frericks, P. (2007). Pension reforms in Europe and life-course politics. Social Policy and Administration, 41(5), 487-504. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00569.x

Disney, R. (2000). “Crises in public pension programmes in OECD: What are the reform options?”, The Economic Journal, 110(461): F1-F23.

European Commission. (2010a). Progress and key challenges in the delivery of adequate and sustainable pensions in Europe, European Economy, Occasional Paper 71.

European Commission (2010b). Joint report on social protection and social inclusion 2010. Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission. (2012). The 2012 ageing report: economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU Member States (2010-2060), European Economy 2/2012. Brussels: European Commission.

Feldstein, M. (1974). Social security, induced retirement and aggregate capital accumulation. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(5), 905-926. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829174.

Fultz, E. & Stanovnik, T. (2004). The collection of pension contributions: Trends, issues, and problems in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: ILO Sub-regional Office for Central and Eastern Europe.

Grech, A.G. (2012). Evaluating the possible impact of pension reforms on future living standards in Europe, CASEpaper 161. London: LSE Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.

Grech, A.G. (2013). How best to measure pension adequacy, CASEpaper 172. London: LSE Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.

Grech, A.G. (2014). Assessing the sustainability of pension reforms in Europe, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29(2), 1-20. doi:10.1080/21699763.2013.836980

Hering, M. (2006). The politics of structural pension reform in Western Europe: Does the EU matter? Paper presented at the Fifteenth International Conference of the Council for European Studies, March 29–April 2, 2006, Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.ces.columbia.edu/pub/papers/Hering.pdf.

Hills, J. (1995). “The welfare state and redistribution between generations”, in The dynamic of welfare: the welfare state and the life cycle, J. Falkingham & J. Hills (eds.). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Holzmann, R. & Hinz, R. (2005). Old-age income support in the 21st century: An international perspective on pension systems and reform. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

International Monetary Fund. (2011). The challenge of public pension reform in advanced and emerging economies. Washington D.C.: The International Monetary Fund.

Jousten, A. (2007). Public pension reform: a primer, IMF Working Paper WP/07/28. Washington D.C.: The International Monetary Fund.

Longevity Science Advisory Panel. (2012). Life expectancy: past and future variations by socio-economic group in England and Wales. London: Longevity Science Advisory Panel.

Maddaloni, A., Musso, A., Rother, P., Ward-Warmedinger, M. & Westermann, T. (2006). Macroeconomic implications of demographic developments in the Euro Area. ECB Occasional Paper No.51. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

Orszag, P.R. & Stiglitz, J. (1999). Rethinking pension reform: Ten myths about Social Security systems. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Ove Moene, K. & Wallerstein, M. (2003). “Earnings inequality and welfare spending: A disaggregated analysis”, World Politics, 55: 485-516.

Palacios, R. & Sluchynsky, O. (2006). Social Pensions – Part I: Their role in the overall pension system, Pension Reform Primer Series Discussion Paper No.0601. Washington DC: World Bank.

Palmer, E. (2006). “What is NDC?”, in Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes, R. Holzmann & E. Palmer (eds). Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Queisser, M. & Whitehouse, E. (2006). Neutral or fair? Actuarial concepts and pension-system design, DELSA/ELSA/WD/SEM(2006)9. Paris: OECD.

Social Protection Committee (2006). Minimum income provision for older people and their contribution to adequacy in retirement, Special Study. Brussels: European Commission.

Whitehouse, E. (2012). Reversals of systemic pension reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications. Paris: OECD.

World Bank. (2006). Pension reform and the development of pension systems: an evaluation of World Bank assistance, Independent Evaluation Group Report 35521. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

Zaidi, A., Grech, A.G., & Fuchs, M. (2006) Pension policy in EU25 and its possible impact on elderly poverty, CASEpaper 116. London: LSE Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.