What do we expect of others?

Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael (2014): What do we expect of others?

Abstract

We report experimental data on expectations about generosity in a dictator game in which dictators first divide the pie and then make a guess about the donation of other dictators. In our experiment, recipients have to guess the donation that they are going to receive from their own dictator as well as the donation of other dictator, whose choice does not affect their own payoffs. Our findings indicate that property rights are important to explain guesses, as dictators predict a smaller donation from other dictators than recipients do. We also observe that the involvement in the game is crucial as recipients expect other dictators to be more generous than their own dictator. When we compare guesses with actual donations, we see that dictators' guesses are positively correlated with their own transfer and that recipients overestimate the kindness of other dictators, as they expect them to be more kind than what they actually are.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: generosity, expectations, dictator game, fairness, property rights, involvement.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy

References

- Cabrales, A. 2010. The causes and economic consequences of envy. SERIEs, 1:371--386.

- Charness, G., Dufwenberg, M., 2006. Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74:1579-1601.

- Chowdhury, S. M., Jeon, J. Y., 2013. Altruism, Anticipation, and Gender, mimeo,.

- Clark, A., Frijters, P., Shields, M., 2008. Relative income, happiness, and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46: 95--144.

- Croson, R., Konow, J., 2009. Social preferences and moral biases. Journal of Economic behaviour and Organization, 69:201--212.

- Dana, J., Weber, R. A., Kuang, J. X. 2007. Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33(1):67-80.

- Ellingsen, T., Johannsesson, M., Tjotta, S., Torsvik, G., 2010. Testing guilt aversion. Games and Economic behaviour, 68:95-107.

- Engel, C., 2011. Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14 (4):583-610\label{title,.

- Fischbacher, U., 2007. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10:171--178.

- Fischbacher, U., Gachter, S., 2010. Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments. The American Economic Review, 100(1):541--556

- Frey, B. S., and Stutzer, A., 2002. What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40:402-435.

- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Smith, V., 1994. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic behaviour, 7:346, 380

- Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. and V. L. Smith, 1996. Social Distance and Other-regarding behaviour in Dictator Games. The American Economic Review, 86:653-690.

- Iriberri, N., Rey-Biel, P., 2013. Elicited Beliefs and Social Information in Modified Dictator Games: What Do Dictators Believe Other Dictators Do? Quantitative Economics, forthcoming.

- Krupka, E. and Weber, R. 2009. The Focusing and Informational Effects of Norms on Pro-Social behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30:307--320.

- McBride, M. 2010. Money, happiness, and aspirations: An experimental study. Journal of Economic behaviour and Organization, 74, 261-276.

- Rigdon, M.L., Levine, A. S. 2011. Gender, Expectations, and the Price of Giving. mimeo,.

- Ruff. C.C., Ugazio, G., Fehr, E. 2013. Changing social norms compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation, Science, DOI:10.1126/science.1241399.