Geographic Regulation and Cooperative Investment in Next Generation Broadband Networks - A Review of Recent Literature and Practical Cases

Balmer, Roberto (2013): Geographic Regulation and Cooperative Investment in Next Generation Broadband Networks - A Review of Recent Literature and Practical Cases. Published in:

Abstract

Alternative telecom operators have continuously invested in their own infrastructure in recent years. After more than a decade since liberalisation, competitive conditions have substantially changed, especially in urban areas. European regulatory authorities have acknowledged this development by starting regional deregulation. Additionally, different forms of cooperative investments in next generation broadband have appeared on the market. The effects of such schemes on competition, investment and welfare crucially depend on the fine details of implementation. For instance, in the case of joint-ventures, it matters how investment costs are shared and how internal and external access prices are determined. In the case of long-term access agreements, it is essential to consider how access tariffs are structured, whether they can adapt to market developments ex-post and whether contracts are signed before or after the investment takes place. Generally, many of these agreements allow some extent of risk sharing, offering the possibility to increase investment incentives when firms are not risk neutral. This article reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on geographic regulation and co-investments in next generation broadband. It is suggested that regulators consider introducing regulated co-investment agreements complementing current regulation or in some cases even substituting for it, in addition to considering geographically segmented access prices.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: NGA co-investment models, investment sharing, cooperative investment, investment cooperation, geographic regulation
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L41 - Monopolization ; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L96 - Telecommunications

References

Akamai. 2012. The state of the internet.

Anacom. (2009). Markets for the Supply of Wholesale (Physical) Network Infrastructure Access at a Fixed Location and Wholesale Broadband Access.

Anton, J.J., Vander Weide, J.H., & Vettas, N. (1999). Strategic Pricing and Entry under Universal Service and Cross-Market Price Constraints: Duke University, Department of Economics.

ARCEP. (2009). Recommandation de l’Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes relative aux modalités de l’accès aux lignes de communications électroniques à très haut débit en fibre optique.

Autoriteit Consument en Markt. (2013). Tariefbesluit ontbundelde glastoegang (FTTH) 2012. Decision DTVP/2013/201158.

Avenali, A., Matteucci, G., & Reverberi, P. (2010). Dynamic access pricing and investment in alternative infrastructures. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(2), 167-175.

BEREC. (2012a). Report on Co-investment and SMP in NGA networks. (12)41.

BEREC. (2012b). Report on the Implementation of the NGA Recommendation. (11)43.

BEREC. (2010a). Next Generation Access – Implementation Issues and Wholesale Products. (10)08.

BEREC. (2010b). Report on self-supply.(10)09.

BEREC. (2013). Common Position on Geographic Aspects of Market Analysis. Public consultation document. (13)186.

Bourreau, M., Cambini, C., & Doğan, P. (2012). Access pricing, competition, and incentives to migrate from “old” to “new” technology. International Journal of Industrial Organization.

Bourreau, M., Cambini, C., & Hoernig, S. (2010). National FTTH plans in france, italy and portugal. Communications and Strategies(78), 107-126.

Bourreau, M., Cambini, C., & Hoernig, S. (2012a). Ex ante regulation and co-investment in the transition to next generation access. Telecommunications Policy, 36(5), 399-406.

Bourreau, M., Cambini, C., & Hoernig, S. (2012b). Geographic Access Rules and Investment. CEPR-Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper Series, 9013, 1-48.

Bourreau, M., Cambini, C., & Hoernig, S. (2013). Cooperative Investment, Uncertainty and Access. CEPR-Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper Series, 9376, 1-36.

Bourreau, M., & Doǧan, P. (2005). Unbundling the local loop. European Economic Review, 49(1), 173-199.

Bresnahan, T.F., & Salop, S.C. (1986). Quantifying the competitive effects of production joint ventures. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 4(2), 155-175.

Cambini, C., & Jiang, Y. (2009). Broadband investment and regulation: A literature review. Telecommunications Policy, 33(10), 559-574.

Cambini, C., & Silvestri, V. (2012). Technology investment and alternative regulatory regimes with demand uncertainty. Information Economics and Policy, 24, 212-230.

Cambini, C., & Silvestri, V. (2013). Investment Sharing in Broadband Networks. Working Paper.

Cave, M. (2008). Building the broadband network. In Australia’s Broadband Future: Four doors to greater competition. Committee for the Economic Development of Australia (CEDA), Growth No. 60

Choné, P., Flochel, L., & Perrot, A. (2000). Universal service obligations and competition. Information Economics and Policy, 12(3), 249-259.

Choné, P., Flochel, L., & Perrot, A. (2002). Allocating and funding universal service obligations in a competitive market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(9), 1247-1276.

De Bijl, P., & Peitz, M. (2006). Local loop unbundling: One-way access and imperfect competition. In: R. Dewenter, & J. Haucap (Eds.). Access pricing: Theory and practice (91–117). Vol. 86. Elsevier.

de Matos, M. G., & Ferreira, P. (2011). Entry in Telecommunications' Markets. Mimeo.

de Streel, A. (2010). Market Definition in the Electronic Communication Sector. Telecommunications, Broadcasting and the Internet: EU Competition Law and Regulation, 3rd ed., Sweet & Maxwell, 411-435.

Elixmann, D., Ilic, D., Neumann, K.-H., & Plückebaum, T. (2008). The Economics of Next Generation Access. WIK-Consult Report for the European Competitive Telecommunication Association (ECTA).

European Commission. (2002). Guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of significant market power under the Community regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services.

European Commission. (2010a). Recommendation on regulated access to next generation access networks (NGA). Official Journal of the European Communities, Bruxelles.

European Commission. (2010b). A digital Agenda for Europe. Official Journal of the European Communities, Bruxelles. COM(2010) 245 final/2. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF

European Commission (2011). Digital agenda scoreboard 2013. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/

European Commission (2013). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on measures to reduce the cost of deploying high-speed electronic communications networks. COM(2013) 147 final.

Flacher, D., & Jennequin, H. (2012). Access regulation and geographic deployment of a new generation infrastructure. Mimeo.

Foros, Ø. (2004). Strategic investments with spillovers, vertical integration and foreclosure in the broadband access market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(1), 1-24.

Foros, Ø., & Kind, H.J. (2003). The broadband access market: Competition, uniform pricing and geographical coverage. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23(3), 215-235.

Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1984). The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. The American Economic Review, 74(2), 361-366.

Hoernig, S.H. (2006). Should uniform pricing constraints be imposed on entrants? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 30(2), 199-216.

Hoernig, S., Jay, S., Neu, W., Neumann, K. H., Plückebaum, T., & Vogelsang, I. (2012). Wholesale pricing, NGA take-up and competition. Communications and Strategies, (86), 153.

Hoernig, S., Jay, S., Neumann, K.-H., Peitz, M., Plückebaum, T., & Vogelsang, I. (2012). The impact of different fibre access network technologies on cost, competition and welfare. Telecommunications Policy, 36(2), 96-112.

Houpis, G., Santamaria, J., & Lucena Betriu, J. (2011). Geographic segmentation of broadband markets: appropriate differentiation or risk to a single EU market? Communications and Strategies(82), 105-126.

Ilic, D., Neumann, K., Plückebaum, T. (2009). Szenarien einer nationalen Glasfaserausbaustrategie in der Schweiz. WIK-Consult Report.

Inderst, R., J. Kühling, K.-H. Neumann and M. Peitz (2012), Investitionen, Wettbewerb und Netzzugang bei NGA

Inderst, R., & Peitz, M. (2012a). Network investment, access and competition. Telecommunications Policy, 36(5), 407-418.

Inderst, R., & Peitz, M. (2012b). Market asymmetries and investments in next generation access networks. Review of Network Economics, 11(1).

Inderst, R., & Peitz, M.(2013). Investment Under Uncertainty and Regulation of New Access Networks. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (13-020).

Informa. 2011. Romania: Where the incumbent is not the incumbent.

Jay, S., Neumann, K.-H., & Plückebaum, T. (2011). Critical market shares for investors and access seekers and competitive models in fibre networks. WIK-Consult Report.

Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American economic review, 75(3), 424-440.

Katz, R.L., Vaterlaus, S., Zenhäusern, P., & Suter, S. (2010). Polynomics. The impact of broadband on jobs and the German economy. Intereconomics, 45(1), 26-34.

Krämer, J., & Vogelsang, I. (2012a). Co-investments and tacit collusion in regulated network industries: Experimental evidence. Available at SSRN 2119927.

Laffont, J.J., & Tirole, J. (2001). Competition in telecommunications: the MIT Press.

Lestage, R., & Flacher, D. (2010). Telecommunications infrastructure investment: Access regulation and geographical coverage: Mimeo. Retrieved from http://www.webmeets.com/files/papers/EARIE/2010/73/Lestage-Flacher%2C2010%20%28EARIE%29.pdf

Manenti, F., & Scialà, A. (2011). Access Regulation, Entry, and Investment in Telecommunications.

Middleton, C., & Van Gorp, A. (2010). Fiber to the home unbundling and retail competition: developments in the Netherlands. Communications and Strategies,78(2), 87-106.

Mizuno, K. (2009). Comparison of investment regimes with cost-based access pricing rules. Japan and the World Economy, 21(3), 248-255.

Mölleryd, B.G. (2011). Network sharing and co-investments in NGN as a way to fulfill the goal with the digital agenda.

Neu, W., Neumann, K. H., & Vogelsang, I. (2012). Analyse von alternativen Methoden zur Preisregulierung.Analyse von alternativen Methoden zur Preisregulierung. Studie für das Bundesamt für Kommunikation. WIK-Consult Report.

Nitsche, R. (2010). NGA: Access regulation, investment and welfare. A model based comparative analysis.

Nitsche, R., & Wiethaus, L. (2011). Access regulation and investment in next generation networks—A ranking of regulatory regimes. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(2), 263-272.

OECD. (2010). Geographically segmented regulation for telecommunications, DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)6/FINAL

OPTA. (2008). Policy rules. Tariff regulation for unbundled fibre access. Decision OPTA/AM/2008/202874

Pereira, J. P., & Ferreira, P. (2011, January). Next Generation Access Networks (NGANs) and the geographical segmentation of markets. In ICN 2011, The Tenth International Conference on Networks (pp. 69-74).

Plum (2011). Costing methodology and the transition to next generation access. Report for ETNO.

Polynomics. (2009). Fibre Platform Competition, New York, Olten, 10. Juli 2009.

Riordan, M. H. (1992). Regulation and preemptive technology adoption. The Rand Journal of Economics, 334-349.

Röller, L.-H., & Waverman, L. (2001). Telecommunications infrastructure and economic development: A simultaneous approach. American Economic Review, 909-923.

Schneir, J. R., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Strategic and economic aspects of network sharing in FTTH/PON architectures. In 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 (No. 60397). International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

Shubik, M., & Levitan, R. (1980). Market structure and behavior: Harvard University Press Cambridge.

Stockdale, D. (2011). Geographically Segmented Regulation: Lessons from the FCC for European Communications Markets. Communications and Strategies(82), 85-104.

Valletti, T.M., Hoernig, S., & Barros, P.P. (2002). Universal service and entry: The role of uniform pricing and coverage constraints. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21(2), 169-190.

van Dijk. (2012). Broadband Internet Access Cost. Report for the European Commission. September 2012.

Xavier, P., & Ypsilanti, D. (2011). Geographically segmented regulation for telecommunications: lessons from experience. info, 13(2), 3-18.

Zenhäusern, P., Suter, S., & Vaterlaus, S. (2010). Plattformwettbewerb und regulatorische Empfehlungen. Polynomics Studie.