Koumparoulis, Dimitrios Nikolaou (2014): BRICs versus Other Emerging Economies: The Case of India. Published in: International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Review , Vol. 2, No. 2 (2014): pp. 115-121.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54388.pdf Download (244kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In late April 2013, Jim O’Neill retired as chairman of Goldman Sachs (GS). The 56-year-old British economist, among other accomplishments, left his mark on the still unfolding globalization story by coining the acronym BRIC, referring to the four rapidly developing nations—Brazil, Russia, India and China—that seemed ready a decade ago to challenge the economic supremacy of the United States, Japan, and Western Europe.
Since O’Neill invented the term in 2001, the BRICs have evolved in very different ways and have developed at very different rates. While China’s economy continues to boom, though off its torrid pace of a few years ago, Russia’s economic growth rate slowed last year to an estimated 3.4 percent, according to its Federal Statistics Service—down from 4.3 percent in 2011 and 4.5 percent the year before. Brazil’s gross domestic product grew just 0.9 percent in 2012, while India’s expanded at a 5 percent rate. As O’Neill bows out, perhaps a bigger story than the BRICs today—one that deserves more attention in the board room—is the large number of countries that are now competing with the BRICs, even outpacing them, often for the same reasons the BRICs have done well.
What this means, looking ahead, is that corporate executives, as they review their global plans, have more options than ever before available to them.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | BRICs versus Other Emerging Economies: The Case of India |
English Title: | BRICs versus Other Emerging Economies: The Case of India |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | BRICs, India, Emerging Markets, Foreign Direct Investment, Elections |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E66 - General Outlook and Conditions |
Item ID: | 54388 |
Depositing User: | Zeki Yuksekbilgili |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2014 06:58 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 17:51 |
References: | Ernst & Young Report (2013), Looking beyond the obvious: globalization and new opportunities for growth Thornton, G. (2014), G7 businesses set to benefit from global economic shift, Grant Thornton’s International Business Report (IBR) Koumparoulis, D. N. (2012), International Trade: How the Global Economy was Lost? Transnational Corporations Review, Page 1-15, Volume 4, Number 2, June 2012 OECD (2011), Economic Survey of India 2011, printed edition The Economic Times (2013), India Economy to grow at 6.4% rate in 2013: United Nations The IMF Survey Magazine (2014), India: Economy Stabilizes, but High Inflation, Slow Growth Key Concerns Yan, S., Chaudhary, L., Musacchio, A., Nafziger, S. (2012), Big BRICs, Weak Foundations: The Beginning of Public Elementary Education in Brazil, Russia, India, and China, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper, No. 17852 http://www.tradingeconomics.com/india/gdp (2013), Trading Economics http://finmin.nic.in/the_ministry/dept_eco_affairs/dea.asp, Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India http://www.heritage.org (2013), 2013 Index of Economic Freedom |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54388 |