The bilateral trade balance of the EU in the presence of structural breaks

Ketenci, Natalya (2014): The bilateral trade balance of the EU in the presence of structural breaks.

Abstract

This paper examines the bilateral trade dynamics of the EU with its major trade partners. Previous studies on the bilateral trade dynamics of the EU have been based on estimations without the consideration of the presence of structural breaks. This paper examines the impacts of the real exchange rate and real income on the trade balance of the EU with its major trade partners in the presence of structural breaks. The empirical analysis includes ten major trade partners of the EU for 1980-2012, on a quarterly basis. The paper applies the Bai and Perron (1998) structural break test to determine the presence of structural breaks in series. In order to test the cointegration relationships of series, three different cointegration techniques were applied to the data. First, the Gregory and Hansen (1996) cointegration test was applied, which allows for one structural shift; then, for cases where two breaks were detected, the Hatemi-J (2008) cointegration test was employed. Finally, for countries where more than two breaks are detected, the Maki (2012) cointegration test was applied, which allows for an unknown number of breaks. The parameters of the model were estimated using the Bai and Perron (1998) procedure, which allows for structural breaks, and the OLS procedure without consideration of structural breaks. The paper investigates how the different dynamics of the bilateral trade balance of the EU appear after possible structural breaks consideration.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Bilateral trade balance, J-curve, cointegration, structural breaks, EU.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange

References

Arize, A. (1987). The supply and demand for imports and exports in a simultaneous model. Applied Economics, 19(9), 1233-1247.

Aziz, J. and Li, X. (2007). China’s changing trade elasticities. IMF Working Paper, November, WP/07/266.

Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Kantipong, T. (2001). Bilateral J-curve between Thailand and her trading partners. Journal of Economic Development 26, 107-117.

Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Niroomand, F. (1998). Long-run price elasticities and the Marshall-Lerner condition revisited. Economics Letters, 61(1), 101-109.

Bahmani-Oskooee, M. and Ratha, A. (2008). Exchange rate sensitivity of US bilateral trade flows. Economics System, 32, 129-141.

Bai, J. and Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66, 47-68.

Bai, J. and Perron, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1–22.

Dornbusch, R. (1980). Open Economy Macroeconomics. New York. Basic Books.

Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T.J. and Stock, J.H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64, 813-836.

Hatemi-J, A. and Irandoust, M. (2005). Bilateral trade elasticities: Sweden versus her major trading partners. American Review of Political Economy, 3(2), 38-50.

Hatemi-J, A. (2008). Tests for cointegration with two unknown regime shifts with an application to financial market integration. Empirical Economics, 35(3), 497-505.

Gregory, A.W. and Hansen, B.E. (1996). Tests for cointegration in models with trend and regime shifts. Oxford Bulletin for Economics and Statistics, 58(3), 555-560.

Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-54.

Imbs, J. and Meajean, I. (2010). Trade elasticities: A final report for the European Commission. Economic Papers, 432, December.

Kapetanios, G. (2005). Unit-root testing against the alternative hypothesis of up to m structural breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 26, 123–133.

Ketenci,N and Uz, I. (2011). Bilateral and regional trade elasticities of the EU. Empirical Economics, 40(3), 839-854.

Khan, M. (1974). Import and export demand in developing countries. IMF Staff Papers, September, 678-693.

Kreinin, M.E. (1967). Price elasticities in the international trade. The Review of Economics

Liu, J., Wu, S., & Zidek, J.V. (1997). On segmented multivariate regressions. Statistica Sinica, 7, 497-525.

Mah, J.S. (1993). Structural change in import demand behavior: The Korean experience. Journal of Policy Modelling, 15(2), 223-227.

Marquez, J. (1990). Bilateral trade elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, February, 70-77.

Murad, S.M.W. (2012). Bilateral export and import demand functions of Bangladesh: A cointegration approach. Bangladesh Development Studies, XXXV(1), 43-60.

Maki, D. (2012). Tests for cointegration allowing for an unknown number of breaks. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2011-2015.

Ng, S. and Perron, P. (2001). Lag selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69, 1519–1554.

Perron, P. and Ng, S. (1996). Useful modifications to some unit root tests with dependent errors and their local asymptotic properties. Review of Economic Studies, 63, 435-463.

Sinha, D. (2001). A note on trade elasticities in Asian countries. The International Trade Journal, 15(2), 221-237

Uz, I.(2010). Testing for structural change in the bilateral trade elasticities of Turkey. Middle East Technical University Studies in Development, 37(1), 53-72.

Zivot, E. and Andrews, D. (1992). Further evidence of great crash, the oil price shock and unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.