Ketenci, Natalya (2014): The Effect of the European Union Customs Union on the Balance of Trade in Turkey.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_54662.pdf Download (167kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of the customs union between Turkey and the European Union on the balance of trade in Turkey. The framework for analysis is an extended trade gravity model onto which the impact of the customs union is applied. The gravity model of trade is estimated using dynamic panel data which applies the Generalized Method of Moments to a sample of OECD countries. Separate estimates were made for the periods before and after the process of trade liberalization in Turkey – 1980-1995 and 1996-2012, respectively – as well as for the full period – 1980-2012. The main conclusion is that when the European Union is accounted for as an econometric variable, the empirical results are striking: Turkey’s gains resulting from taking part in the customs union are noteworthy, with significant improvement in the trade balance with European Union countries. However, the trade flows, and specifically imports, have been mainly with OECD countries that are themselves not members of the EU. The model indicates that external common tariffs are responsible for Turkey’s trade growth rather than tariffs abolished in the internal market of the customs union.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Effect of the European Union Customs Union on the Balance of Trade in Turkey |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Gravity model; GMM; Customs Union; European Union; OECD countries, Turkey. |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration |
Item ID: | 54662 |
Depositing User: | Natalya Ketenci |
Date Deposited: | 26 Mar 2014 09:55 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 16:29 |
References: | Adam, A. and T. Moutos (2008). The trade effects of the EU-Turkey customs union. The World Economy, 31(5), 685-700. Akkemik, K.A. (2011). Customs union and competitiveness of Turkish exports in the EU market: A dynamic shift-share analysis. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 3(2), 247-274. Akkemik, K.A. (2012). Dependence on imported inputs and implications for technology transfer in Turkey. In: Murat A. Yülek and Travis K. Taylor (eds.), Designing Public Procurement Policy in Developing Countries: How to Foster Technology Transfer and Industrialization in the Global Economy, Springer, 173-177. Baier, S.L. and J.H. Bergstand (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71, 72-95. Baldwin, R.E. (1996). Progressive economic integration: making the magic work again. Economics of Transition, (4)2, 512-514. Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M. and C. Osbat (2004). Some cautions on the use of panel methods for integrated series of macro-economic data. Econometrics Journal, 7, 322-340. Banerjee, A., Marcellino, M. and C. Osbat (2005). Testing for PPP: Should we use panel methods? Empirical Economics, 30, 77-91. Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. in B.Baltagi (ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, (Advances in Econometrics, 15, 161-178, Elsevier Science. Bun, M.J.G. and F.J.G.M. Klaassen (2002). The importance of dynamics on panel gravity models of trade. Discussion Paper, 108/2, Tinbergen Institute. Bussière, M., Fidrmuc, J., and B. Schnatz (2008). EU enlargement and trade integration: Lessons from a gravity model. Review of Development Economics, 12(3), 501–515. Carrere, C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, 50, 223-247. Cheng, I.H. and H.J., Wall (2005). Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 87, 49–63. Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249-272. Clausing, K.A. (2000). Customs unions and Free Trade Areas, Journal of Economic Integration, 15, 418-435. Dai, M., Yotov, Y.V. and T. Zylkin (2014). On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements. Economics Letters, 122, 321-325. Demirci, N. and L. Aydin (2011). Long-run effects of customs union between European Union and Turkey: Is it zero-sum game? Modern Economy, 2, 132-141. Eichengreen, B. and D. Irwin (1997). The role of history in bilateral trade flows. In Issues in Regionalism, ed. by J. Frankel, 33-57, Chicago. University of Chicago Press. Facchini, G., Silva, P. and G. Willmann (2013). The customs union issue: Why do we observe so few of them? Journal of International Economics, 90(1), 136-147. Fiorentino, R.V., Verdeja, L. and C. Toqueboeuf (2007). The changing landscape of regional trade agreements: 2006 Update. WTO Discussion Paper No. 12. Frankel, J.A. (1997). Regional trading blocs. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC. Frankel, J.A., Stein, E. and S.J. Wei (1995). Trading blocs and the Americas: The natural, the unnatural, and the super-natural. Journal of Development Economics, 47(1), 61-95. Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogenous panel data. Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148-161. Glick, R. and A.K. Rose (2002). Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence. European Economic Review, 46(6), 1125–1151. Ghosh, S. and S. Yamarik (2004). Are regional trading arrangements trade creating? An application of extreme bounds analysis. Journal of International Economics, 63(2), July, 369-395. Gros, D. and Selçuki, C. (2013). The changing structure of Turkey’s trade and industrial competitiveness: Implications for the EU. Centre for European Policy Studies, Working Paper 03, January. Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. and Y. Shin (2003). Testing for unit root in heterogenous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74. Krueger, A.O. (1997). Free Trade Agreements versus Customs Unions. Journal of Development Economics, 54, 169-187. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B, Schmidt, P. and Y. Shin (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 44, 159-178. Lejour, A. M. and R.A. de Mooij (2005). Turkish delight: does Turkey’s accession to the EU bring economic benefits? Kyklos, 58, 87-120. Levin, A., Lin, C.F. and C.S.J. Chu (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometric, 108(1), 1-24. Li, X. (2003). Trade liberalization and real exchange rate movement. IMF Working Paper, 03/124. Maddala, G.S. and S. Wu (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652. Martinez-Zarzoso, I, Felicitas, N.L.D. and N. Horsewood (2009). Are regional trading agreements beneficial? Static and dynamic panel gravity models. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20, 46-65. Neyaptı, B., Taşkın, F. and M. Üngör (2007). Has European customs union agreement really affected Turkey’s trade? Applied Economics, 39(16), 2121-2132. Nowak-Lehmann, F., Herzer, D., Martinez-Zarzoso, I. and S. Vollmer (2007). The impact of a customs union between Turkey and the EU on Turkey’s exports to the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 719-743. Pacheco-Lopez, P. and A.P. Thirlwall (2007). Trade liberalisation and the trade-off between growth and the balance of payments in Latin America. International Review of Applied Economics, 21(4), 469-490. Park, I. and S. Park (2009). Free trade agreements versus customs unions: An examination of East Asia. Asian Economic Papers, 8(2), 119-139. Pllaha. A. (2010). EU – Albania Stabilization and Association Agreement. Gravity model for trade: The Albanian Case. Bank of Albania, Tirana 18 – 19 November. Roy, J. (2010). Do customs union members engage in more bilateral trade than free-trade agreement members? Review of International Economics, 18(4), 663-681. Santos-Paulino, A.U. and A.P. Thirlwall (2004). The impact of trade liberalization on exports, imports, and the balance of payments of developing countries. Economic Journal, 114, 50–72. Timbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy; Suggestions for an international economy policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York. Togan, S. (2000). Effects of a Turkey – European Union customs union and prospects for the future. Russian and East European Finance and Trade, 36(4), 5-25. Togan, S. (2012). The EU-Turkey customs union: A model for future euro-med Integration. MEDPRO Technical Report, 9, March. Wu,Y. and L. Zeng (2008). The impact of trade liberalization on the trade balance in developing countries. IMF Working Paper, 08/14. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/54662 |