The economics of U.S. ethanol import tariffs with a consumption mandate and tax credit

de Gorter, Harry and Just, David R. (2007): The economics of U.S. ethanol import tariffs with a consumption mandate and tax credit.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of an ethanol import tariff in conjunction with a consumption mandate and tax credit. A tax credit alone acts as a subsidy to ethanol producers, equally benefiting exporters like Brazil. If an import tariff is imposed to offset the tax credit, world prices of ethanol decline by less than the tariff (unless oil prices are unaffected). Eliminating the tariff with a tax credit in place results in a significant gain to exporters like Brazil but eliminating the tax credit too reduces the initial benefits to Brazil of the tariff reduction substantially. The results change however if there is “water” in the tax credit. Then exporters benefit much more with the elimination of both the tariff and tax credit compared to a situation of both policies in place. If only a mandate was in place, exporters like Brazil again benefit as much as domestic ethanol producers do. Eliminating the tariff with a mandate results in an increase in domestic ethanol prices (even if oil prices do not change) because more domestic supply is required to maintain the mandate. The tariff therefore has a smaller negative impact on world ethanol prices with a mandate compared to a tax credit. A tax credit with a binding mandate is a subsidy to fuel consumers and only indirectly benefits ethanol producers if ethanol prices increase due to increased demand for ethanol with the increase in fuel consumption). Therefore, eliminating the tax credit with a binding mandate has little effect on market prices of ethanol – domestic and foreign producers alike benefit very little with a tax credit in this situation. Brazil would much prefer the elimination of the tax credit and the so-called offsetting import tariff when a mandate is binding. Hence, the protective effects of an import tariff are not additive with either a tax credit or the price premium due to a mandate.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Cornell University
• Language: English
• Keywords: biofuels; mandate; tax credit; ethanol; tariff
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q17 - Agriculture in International Trade

References

de Gorter, Harry, and David R. Just. (2007a). “The Welfare Economics of an Excise-Tax Exemption for Biofuels”, Department of Applied Economics and Management Working Paper #2007-13, Cornell University, 17 September. de Gorter, Harry, and David R. Just. (2007b). “The Economics of a Biofuel Consumption Mandate and Excise-Tax Exemption: An Empirical Example of U.S. Ethanol Policy”, Department of Applied Economics and Management Working Paper # 2007-20, Cornell University, 23 October. Doornbosch, Richard, and Ronald Steenblik. (2007). “Biofuels: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?”, OECD Round Table on Sustainable Development, SG/SD/RT(2007)3, 11-12 September. Elobeid, Amani and Simla Tokgoz. (2007). “Removing Distortions in the U.S. Ethanol Market: What Does It Imply for the United States and Brazil?”, Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland, OR, July 29-August 1. Howse, Robert, Petrus van Bork and Charlotte Hebebrand. (2006). WTO Disciplines and Biofuels: Opportunities and Constraints in the Creation of a Global Marketplace, IPC Discussion Paper, International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Washington, D.C., October. Jank, Marcos J., Geraldine Kutas, Luiz Fernando do Amaral and Andre M. Nassar. (2007). EU and U.S. Policies on Biofuels: Potential Impact on Developing Countries, The German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington DC. Johnson, Robbin S. and C. Ford Runge. (2007) “The Brave New World of Biofuels” Issues in Science and Technology, Quarterly Journal of the National Academies of Sciences, forthcoming. Klapper, Bradley. (2007). “Brazil Wants Probe of U.S. Farm Aid,” Washington Post, Sept. 12, 2007. Kojima, Masami, Donald Mitchell and William Ward. (2007). Considering Trade Policies for Liquid Biofuels. Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP) World Bank, Washington D.C., June. Kojima, Masami and Todd Johnson. (2005). Potential for Biofuels for Transport in Developing Countries Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme (ESMAP) World Bank, Washington D.C., October. Koplow, Doug. Biofuels - At What Cost? Government Support for Ethanol and Biodiesel in the United States. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2006. 25 Kruse, John, Patrick Westhoff, Seth Meyer and Wyatt Thompson. (2007). “Economic Impacts of Not Extending Biofuels Subsidies” FAPRI-UMC Report #17-07, University of Missouri, MO May 2007 Martinez-Gonzalez, Ariadna, Ian Sheldon and Stanley Thompson (2007). “Estimating the Effects of U.S. Distortions in the Ethanol Market Using a Partial Equilibrium Trade Model”, Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland,OR, July 29-August 1. Steenblik, Ronald. (2007). “Biofuels - At What Cost? Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in selected OECD countries”, The Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Geneva, Switzerland, September. Rajagopal, Deepak, and David Zilberman. (2007). “Review of Environmental, Economic and Policy Aspects of Biofuels”, Policy Research Working Paper WPS4341, The World Bank Development Research Group, September. Rask, Kevin N. (2004). “Ethanol Subsidies and the Highway Trust Fund,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 38, Part 1, January, pp. 29-44. Runge, C. Ford and Benjamin Senauer (2007) “How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor”, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Affairs Council, New York, May/June, Vol. 86, Issue 3, pp. 41-53. Sandalow, David (2006). "Ethanol: Lessons from Brazil," A High Growth Strategy for Ethanol (Aspen Institute, Program on Energy, the Environment, and the Economy, Washington D.C. May 2006. Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2006). “Arrested Development” The Guardian, August 10. Tokgoz, Simla and Amani Elobeid. (2007). “Understanding the Underlying Fundamentals of Ethanol Markets: Linkages between Energy and Agriculture”, Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Portland, OR, July 29- August 1. Tyner, Wallace E. (2007). “U.S. Ethanol Policy— Possibilities for the Future” Purdue University Working Paper ID-342-W, West Lafayette, Indiana. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2006). The Emerging Biofuels Market: Regulatory, Trade and Development Implications, United Nations, New York and Geneva. Yacobucci, Brent. (2005). “Ethanol Imports and the Caribbean Basin Initiative.” Report No. RS21930.Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 6 January.