Zaman, Gheorghe and Georgescu, George (2014): Absorbţia fondurilor structurale şi de coeziune în Romania: bilanţul perioadei 2007-2013 şi lecţii pentru exerciţiul financiar curent.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_56144.pdf Download (674kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The balance of the financial exercise 2007-2013 revealed an absorption rate of 27% from the total EU Budget allocations for SCF in the case of Romania. This ratio, the lowest among CEE countries, has been under the influence of various causes, within the system of SCF accessing i.e. at the level of beneficiaries and MAs on different stages of absorption and also outer causes, mainly the legal framework weaknesses and the global crisis effects. The study highlighted the net beneficiary position of Romania relative to the EU budget, but the macroeconomic impact of SCF was found as having rather poor significance. The relevant macroeconomic indicators have registered unfavorable trends during post-crisis period, mainly in terms of foreign investments, external debt and public debt, which could not be mitigated by the SCF inflows. For the period 2014-2020, the new approach of the EU Cohesion Policy, more result-oriented, along with the lessons learned by Romania could address most of factors that are meant to improve the ESI funds absorption, a significant impact being also expected.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Absorbţia fondurilor structurale şi de coeziune în Romania: bilanţul perioadei 2007-2013 şi lecţii pentru exerciţiul financiar curent |
English Title: | The absorption of structural and cohesion funds in Romania: balance of the period 2007-2013 and lessons for the current financial exercise |
Language: | Romanian |
Keywords: | EU Cohesion Policy; Structural and Cohesion Funds; absorption rate; macroeconomic indicators; European funds impact |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E22 - Investment ; Capital ; Intangible Capital ; Capacity F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O19 - International Linkages to Development ; Role of International Organizations |
Item ID: | 56144 |
Depositing User: | George Georgescu |
Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2014 16:24 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 00:31 |
References: | Afonso A., Elegre J. G. (2008) Economic Growth and Budgetary Components. A Panel assessment for the EU, ECB Working Papers SerieS, no 848, January, Frankfurt Allard C., Choueiri N., Schadler S., Van Elkan R. (2008) Macroeconomic Effects of EU Transfers in New Member States, IMF Working Paper WP/08/223, September. Barca F. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations, Independent Report prepared for DG Regio, April, Brussels. Bradley J., Untiedt G., Mitze T. (2007) Analysis of the Impact of Cohesion Policy. A note explaining the HERMIN-based simulations, Muenster and Dublin, May 14. Council of the EU (2011) The Council increases co-financing rates for EU funds to counter crisis, Press release 18512/2011, 12 December, Brussels. European Bank Coordination (“Vienna”) Initiative (2011) The Role of Commercial Banks in the Absorption of EU Funds, Report by the Working Group for discussion at the EBCI Full Forum Meeting, 16-17 March, Brussels. European Bank Coordination (“Vienna”) Initiative (2014) Vienna Initiative set priorities for 2014, Press release, 16 January. European Commisssion (2013a) Cohesion Policy: Strategic Report 2013 on programme implementation 2007-2013, EC REGIO B2 – Evaluation and European Semester, April, Brussels. European Commission (2013b) Analysis of the budgetary implementation of the Structural and Cohesion Funds in 2012, DG Budget, May, Brussels. European Commission (2013c) Refocusing EU Cohesion Policy for Maximum Impact on Growth and Jobs: The Reform in 10 points, updated version of MEMO/13/878, 19 November, Brussels. European Commission (2014a) Financial instruments in ESIF programmes 2014-2020. A short reference guide for Managing Authorities, Ref. Ares 401557 - 18/02/2014, Brussels, February. European Commission (2014b) Promoting inclusive growth, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Unit E1, Brussels, January. European Commission (2014c) The Programming Period 2014-2020. Guidance document on monitoring and evaluation European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund. Concepts and Recommendations, Evaluation and European Semester, The Evaluation Unit of the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, March Florio M., Vignetti S. (2003) Cost-benefit analysis of infrastructure projects in an enlarged European Union: an incentive-oriented approach, Report prepared for Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy, European Commission, Brussels. Georgescu G. (2008) Determinants of Increasing EU Funds Absorption Capacity in Romania, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Economica, Vol. 2 (10), Oradea. González J. A. (2010) An Evaluation of EU regional policy. Do Structural Actions crowd out Public Spending?, Springer Science, November. Hahn J. (2013) Cohesion Policy is the EU Investment Policy, OECD Ministerial Meeting, 5 December, Marseille. Katsarova I. (2013) The (low) absorption of EU Structural Funds, Library of the European Parliament, 1 October, Brussels. Jedlička J. (2014) Cohesion Policy and other EU assistance programmes in 2014-2020, Special Analysis, ERSTE Corporate Banking, UE Office, March. Marzinotto B. (2012) The Growth Effects of EU Cohesion Policy: a Meta-Analysis, Bruegel Working Paper no 14, Brussels. Ministry of European Funds (2014a) Romanian Partnership Agreement for the 2014-2020 Programming Period, (Official Version), Romanian Government, Bucharest, March. Ministry of European Funds (2014b) The status of submission and aproval of projects, of financing contracts signed and of payments to beneficiaries on 31 December 2013 and on 31 March 2014, Romanian Government, Bucharest, February and April. Ministry of European Funds, Operational Programs Implementation Reports, years 2009-2012, Romanian Government, Bucharest. Ministry of Public Finance (2014) Convergence Programme, Romanian Government, Bucharest, April. National Commission of Prognosis, Projections of main macroeconomic indicators, for years 2007-2013, Romanian Government, Bucharest. National Bank of Romania, Balance of Payments and External Debt, Press releases, December for years 2007-2013, Bucharest. Paliova I., Lybek T. (2014) Bulgaria’s EU Funds Absorption: Maximizing the Potential!, IMF Working Paper WP/14/21, February. Piketty T. (2013) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Oxford University Press. Rosenberg C. B., Sierhej R. (2007) Interpreting EU Funds Data for Macroeconomic Analysis in the New Member States, IMF Working Paper WP/07/77, April. Tomova M., Rezessy A., Lenkowski A., Maincent E. (2013) EU governance and EU funds – testing the effectiveness of EU funds in a sound macroeconomic framework, European Economy Economic Paper no. 510, European Commission, December, Brussels. Unguru, M., Ciupagea, C., Turlea, G., Voinescu, R. (2007) – Impactul fondurilor structurale in Romania: Evaluare cu ajutorul modelului HEROM, Studiu CEROPE, Bucureşti. Varga J., in 't Veld J. (2010) The Potential Impact of EU Cohesion Policy Spending in the 2007-13 Programming Period: A Model-Based Analysis, European Economy, Economic Paper no 422, European Commission, September, Brussels. Zaman Gh., Georgescu G. (2009) Structural Funds Absorption: a New Challenge for Romania?, Journal for Economic Forecasting, vol. 6(1), 2009, p. 136-154, March. Zaman Gh., Cristea A. (2011) EU Structural Funds Absorption in Romania: Obstacles and Issues, Romanian Journal of Economics, vol. 32 (1), p. 60-77, June. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/56144 |