Changes in the Eternal City: Inequalities, commons, and elections in Rome districts from 2000 to 2013

Tomassi, Federico (2014): Changes in the Eternal City: Inequalities, commons, and elections in Rome districts from 2000 to 2013.

Abstract

In city districts in Rome, social and economic inequalities between centre and peripheral belts have been increasing over the last years, in parallel to the on-going suburban sprawl. Electoral data from 2000 to 2013 highlight sharp political polarization too. Votes for left-wing (right-wing) candidates are directly (inversely) proportional to proximity to Capitoline Hill. Left-wing coalition prevails where social centrality exists, that is in dense districts with widespread social relationships and many public or collective places. Conversely, right-wing parties prevail in far-off sprawled areas, with less opportunities to meet each other, where production and consumption of relational goods are less likely. Since such goods – according to scholars of civil economics – foster individual well-being and local development, they also affect political choices, challenging the so-called traditional ‘red belt’ in working-class districts until the 1980s.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: City planning; commons; elections; Italy; relational goods; social capital
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R14 - Land Use Patterns; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Acciari P. and Mocetti S. (2013), “Una mappa della disuguaglianza del reddito in Italia” [A Map of Income Inequalities in Italy], in Questioni di Economia e Finanza, Banca d’Italia, No. 208.

Agenzia per il controllo e la qualità dei servizi pubblici locali del Comune di Roma (2011), Quarta indagine sulla qualità della vita e i servizi pubblici locali nella città di Roma [4th Sur-vey on Quality of Life and Local Public Services in Rome], Rome.

Anderlini F. (2009), “Il mito dell’espansione leghista” [The Myth of the Northern League Expansion], il Mulino, No. 5.

Bonciani M. (2009), “La qualità della vita a Roma: fattori ambientali, socio-economici e psico-sociali” [Quality of Life in Rome: Environmental, Socioeconomic, and Psicosocial Factors], Sociologia e ricerca sociale, No. 89.

Brueckner J.K. and Largey A.G. (2008), “Social Interaction and Urban Sprawl”, Journal of Ur-ban Economics, Vol. 64, No. 1.

Bruni L. and Stanca L. (2008), “Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 65.

Burkhalter L. and Castells M. (2009), Beyond the crisis: towards a new urban paradigm, 4th conference of International Forum on Urbanism ‘The New Urban Question: Urbanism Be-yond Neo-Liberalism’, Amsterdam.

Cellamare C. (2014), “Ways of Living in the Market City. Bufalotta and the Porta di Roma Shopping Center”, in Thomassen B. and Clough Marinaro I. (eds.), Global Rome: Changing Faces of the Eternal City, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

Coppola A. (2013), The rise of ‘vetero-liberal’ neighborhood politics. Roman borgate from the collectivist to the privatistic era, International RC21 conference on ‘Resourceful Cities’, Ber-lin.

De Muro P., Monni S., Tridico P. (2011), “Knowledge-based economy and social exclusion: shadows and lights in the Roman socio-economic model”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 35, No. 6.

De Muro P., Monni S., Tridico P. (2012), “Rome. A tale of two cities”, in Martinelli F., Mou-laert F., Novy A. (eds), Urban and Regional Development Trajectories in Contemporary Cap-italism, London, Routledge.

Di Zio S., Montanari A., Staniscia B. (2010), “Simulation of urban development in the City of Rome. Framework, methodology, and problem solving”, Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 3, No. 2.

European Environment Agency – EEA (2006), Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge; Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Copenhagen.

Fruncillo D. (2010), Politica senza reti. L’Italia al voto nel 2006 e nel 2008 [Politics without Nets: Italy Voting in 2006 and 2008], Rome, Ediesse.

Gargiulo Morelli V. and Salvati L. (2010), Ad Hoc Urban Sprawl in the Mediterranean City: Dispersing a Compact Tradition?, Rome, Nuova Cultura.

Gemmiti R. (2012), “Urban competitiveness, culture and tourism. Critical aspects in Rome planning experience”, MEMOTEF Working Papers, Sapienza University of Rome, No. 92.

Gemmiti R., Salvati L., Ciccarelli S. (2012), “Global City or Ordinary City? Rome as a case study”, International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance & Economic Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 2.

Gui B. and Sugden R. (2005), Economics and Social Interactions, Cambridge, Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

Higgins P., Campanera J., Nobajas A. (2014), “Quality of life and spatial inequality in London”, European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1.

ISTAT (2006), Popolazione residente e abitazioni nei grandi comuni italiani. Roma, 14° Cen-simento generale della popolazione e delle abitazioni [Resident Population and Houses in Major Italian Cities: Rome, 14th General Census on Population and Houses], Rome.

ISTAT (2013), Noi Italia. 100 statistiche per capire il Paese in cui viviamo [Noi Italia. 100 Sta-tistics to Understand the Country We Live in], Rome.

Istituto Tagliacarne (2005), Reddito e consumi delle famiglie nei comuni del Lazio e nei quartie-ri di Roma [Income and Consumption of Families in Lazio Cities and Rome Districts], Report for the Lazio Region.

Leyden K.M. (2003), “Social Capital and the Built Environment: The Importance of Walkable Neighborhoods”, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 93, No. 9.

Munafò M., Norero C., Sabbi A., Salvati L. (2010), “Urban soil consumption in the growing city: a survey in Rome”, Scottish Geographical Journal, Vol. 126, No. 3.

Neuman P. (2005), “The compact city fallacy”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 25, No. 1.

Ostrom E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Otto A.H. and Steinhardt M.F. (2014), “Immigration and election outcomes. Evidence from city districts in Hamburg”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 45.

Provincia di Roma (2010), Capitale metropolitana, periferie comuni. Rapporto di studio sulla condizione sociale, economica e territoriale [Metropolitan Capital and Common Peripheries: Study Report on Social, Economic, and Territorial Conditions], Report by Provinciattiva, Rome.

Putnam R.D. (2000), Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York City, Simon & Schuster.

Sabatini F. (2008), “Social capital and the quality of economic development”, Kyklos, Vol. 61, No. 3.

Sabatini F. (2009), “Social capital as social networks: A new framework for measurement and an empirical analysis of its determinants and consequences”, Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 38, No. 3.

Salvati L. (2014), “The ‘Sprawl Divide’: Comparing models of urban dispersion in mono-centric and polycentric Mediterranean cities”, European Urban and Regional Studies, pub-lished online.

Salzano E. (2007), The city as a common good in the European experience, World Social Fo-rum, Nairobi.

Tocci W. (2008), “La città del tram” [The City of Tramways], in Tocci W., Insolera I., Morandi D., Avanti c’è posto. Storie e progetti del trasporto pubblico a Roma, Rome, Donzelli.

Uhlaner C.J. (1989), “Relational goods and participation: incorporating sociality into a theory of rational action”, Public Choice, Vol. 62.

Zamagni S. (2008), “Reciprocity, Civil Economy, Common Good”, in Archer M. and Donati P. (eds), Pursuing the Common Good, Vatican City, The Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.