Multidimensional Poverty and Inequality of Opportunity in Peru: Taking Advantage of the Longitudinal Dimension of Young Lives

Escobal, Javier (2012): Multidimensional Poverty and Inequality of Opportunity in Peru: Taking Advantage of the Longitudinal Dimension of Young Lives. Published in: Young Lives Working Paper Series No. 79 (June 2012)

Abstract

Multidimensional poverty and inequality of opportunity are closely interconnected concepts. Equality of opportunity levels the playing field so that circumstances such as gender, ethnicity, geographical location or family background, which are beyond the control of a child, do not influence his or her life chances. This means that if equality of opportunity is achieved, a child will be able to overcome multidimensional poverty and deprivation. Using the information collected in Peru during the first two rounds of the Young Lives longitudinal study, we describe how multidimensional poverty and inequality of opportunity evolve as children get older. Results show that although scalar indices of multidimensional poverty, deprivations or inequality of opportunity may be quite useful as an advocacy tool, they may mask important heterogeneities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Child Poverty, Inequality, Peru
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth

References

Alkire, S. and J. Foster (2008) Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, OPHI Working Paper No.7 (revised May 2008), Oxford: Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI), University of Oxford

Barrón, M. (2008) ‘Exclusion and Discrimination as Sources of Inter-ethnic Inequality in Peru’, Economia 31.61: 51–80

Bourguignon, F. and S.R. Chakravarty (2003) ‘The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty’, Journal of Economic Inequality 1.1: 25–49

Bourguignon, F., F. Ferreira and M. Menendez (2003) Inequality of Outcomes and Inequality of Opportunities in Brazil, Policy Research Working Paper No. 3174, World Bank, Washington DC

Chakravarty, S.R., D. Mukherjee and R. Ranade (1998) ‘On the Family of Subgroup and Factor Decomposable Measures of Multidimensional Poverty’, Research on Economic Inequality 8: 175–194

Cueto, S., J. Leon, G. Guerrero and I. Muñoz (2009) Psychometric Characteristics of Cognitive Development and Achievement Instruments in Round 2 of Young Lives, Technical Note 15, Oxford: Young Lives

Cueto, S. (2005) ‘Height, Weight, and Educational Achievement in Rural Peru’, Food and Nutrition Bulletin 26.2: S251–S260

Elbers, C., P. Lanjouw , J.A. Mistiaen and Berk Özler (2008) ‘Reinterpreting Between-group Inequality’, Journal of Economic Inequality 6.3: 231–245

Engle, P.L., P. Menon and L. Haddad (1999) ‘Care and Nutrition: Concepts and Measurement’, World Development 27.8: 1309–37

Escobal, J., J. Saavedra and R. Vakis (2012) ‘¿Está el Piso Parejo para los Niños en el Perú? Medición y Comprensión de la Evolución de las Oportunidades’, Lima: World Bank and Grupo de Análisis para el Desarollo (GRADE)

Escobal, J. and C. Ponce (2010) ‘Dinámicas Provinciales de Pobreza en el Perú 1993– 2007’, Working Paper, Santiago de Chile: Programa Dinámicas Territoriales Rurales Rimisp – Centro Latinoamericano para el Desarrollo Rural

Escobal, J. and E. Flores (2009): Maternal Migration and Child Well-being in Peru, Working Paper 56. Oxford: Young Lives

Escobal, J., P. Ames, S. Cueto, M. Penny and E. Flores (2008) ‘Young Lives Round 2 Survey: Initial Report for Peru’, Oxford: Young Lives

Escobal, J. and E. Flores (2008) An Assessment of the Young Lives Sampling Approach in Peru, Technical Note 3, Oxford: Young Lives

Ferreira, F. and J. Gignoux (2008) The Measurement of Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and an Application to Latin America, Policy Research Working Paper No. 4659, Washington DC: World Bank