Wodon, Quentin (2014): Comparing Itemized Tax Deductions across States: A Simple Decomposition Applied to Mortgage Interest Deductions.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_56940.pdf Download (149kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper proposes a simple multiplicative decomposition that can help in comparing the levels of mortgage interest tax deductions observed in different states or areas, and some of the reasons leading to different levels of deductions. The key parameters in the decomposition are a state’s population, its number of tax filers, the share of filers claiming a specific deduction, the average taxes paid by filers, and the average deduction among claimants. The idea is that such simple decompositions can be useful for states and local authorities to better understand some of the reasons why they may have comparatively high or low deductions in their state, and whether the levels of deductions observed are as one might have expected given their overall tax receipts.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Comparing Itemized Tax Deductions across States: A Simple Decomposition Applied to Mortgage Interest Deductions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Tax deductions, Mortgage interest, District of Columbia |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies |
Item ID: | 56940 |
Depositing User: | Quentin Wodon |
Date Deposited: | 29 Jun 2014 05:50 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 00:04 |
References: | Brady, P., J.-A. Cronin, and S. Houser, 2003, Regional Differences in the Utilization of the Mortgage Interest Deduction, Public Finance Review 31(4): 327–366. Cole, A. J., G. Gee, and N. Turner, 2011, The Distributional and Revenue Consequences of Reforming the Mortgage Interest Deduction, National Tax Journal 64 (4): 977–1000. Domenici, P., and A. Rivlin, 2010, Restoring America’s Future: Reviving the Economy, Cutting Spending and Debt, and Creating a Simple, Pro-Growth Tax System, Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center. Follain, J., D. Ling, and G. McGill, 1993, The Preferential Income Tax Treatment of Owner Occupied Housing: Who Really Benefits?, Housing Policy Debate 4 (1): 1–24. Glaeser, E., and J. Shapiro, 2003, The Benefits of the Home Mortgage Interest Deduction, Tax Policy and the Economy 17: 37–82. Gravelle, J. G., and S. Lowry, 2013, Restrictions on Itemized Tax Deductions: Policy Options and Analysis, Report No. R43079, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Gyourko, J., and T. Sinai, 2003, The Spatial Distribution of Housing-Related Ordinary Income Tax Benefits, Real Estate Economics 31(4): 527–575. Gyourko, J., and T. Sinai, 2004, The (Un)Changing Geographical Distribution of Housing Tax Benefits: 1980–2000, Tax Policy and the Economy 18: 175–208. Hanson, A., 2012, The Incidence of the Mortgage Interest Deduction: Evidence from the Market for Home Purchase Loans, Public Finance Review 40(3): 339-59. Hanson, A., 2012, Size of Home, Home Ownership, and the Mortgage Interest Deduction, Journal of Housing Economics 21(3), 195–210. Joint Committee on Taxation (Congressional Research Service), 2013, Estimates of Federal Tax Expenditures, For Fiscal Years 2012-2017, 113th Congress, 1st session, February 1, JCS-1-13, Washington: Government Printing Office. Juffras, J., 2013, Tax Expenditure Briefing to the D.C. Tax Revision Commission, Washington, DC: Office of Revenue Analysis of the District of Columbia. Kerstetter, K., 2009, DC Homeowners’ Property taxes Remain Lowest in the Region, Washington, DC: DC Fiscal Institute. Pew Charitable Trusts, 2013, The Geographic Distribution of the Mortgage Interest Deduction, Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts. Poterba, J., 1992, Taxation and Housing: Old Questions, New Answers, American Economic Review 82(2): 237–242. Poterba, J., and T. Sinai, 2011, Revenue Costs and Incentive Effects of the Mortgage Interest Deduction for Owner-Occupied Housing, National Tax Journal 64(2): 531-564. Ventry, D. J., 2010, The Accidental Deduction: A History and Critique of the Tax Subsidy for Mortgage Interest. Law and Contemporary Problems, 73(1): 233-84. Rivers, W., 2013, Increasing the District’s Personal Exemption and Standard Deduction Would Help Provide Greater Tax Relief to Low- and Moderate-Income DC Residents, Washington, DC: DC Fiscal Institute. Sullivan, M., 2011, Mortgage Deduction Heavily Favors Blue States, Tax Notes 130: 364–367. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/56940 |