Georgescu, George (2013): Public debt, sovereign risk and sustainable development of Romania. Published in: Elsevier Procedia Economics and Finance , Vol. 8, No. 1st International Conference 'Economic Scientific Research - Theoretical, Empirical and Practical Approaches', ESPERA 2013 (May 2014): pp. 353-361.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_57256.pdf Download (358kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The rapid increase in the government debt under the circumstances of the global crisis persistence and financial markets volatility raises the need for a new approach of public debt sustainability, including for Romania. Despite more intense contagion effects according to global markets connectivity, the importance of country specificity in the assessment of sovereign risk, which is decisive in dimensioning the borrowing costs, has grown. In the case of Romania, a sharp deterioration of its fiscal framework strength has been observed during post-crisis period, the public debt-to-GDP ratio currently reaching around 40%, thus doubling as compared to 2008. The structural analysis of government debt portfolio highlighted the main drivers of excessive public indebtedness and the increase in refinancing (rollover) risk on short term, which is supposed to overlap with the exchange rate and interest rate risks on medium and long term. Several indicators of Romania’s debt sustainability are already on the warning levels edge which requires appropriate policies focusing on economic growth recovery, fiscal consolidation ongoing, increasing capacity of generating budgetary revenues, public debt management improvement. Maintaining the financial stability and the investment grade of sovereign risk are decisive for the development of Romania on a sustainable path.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Public debt, sovereign risk and sustainable development of Romania |
English Title: | Public debt, sovereign risk and sustainable development of Romania |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | public debt; debt sustainability; sovereign risk; sustainable development; financial stability |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E60 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F63 - Economic Development G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G01 - Financial Crises H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O23 - Fiscal and Monetary Policy in Development |
Item ID: | 57256 |
Depositing User: | George Georgescu |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jul 2014 03:38 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 09:56 |
References: | Cecchetti S. G., Mohanty M. S., Zampolli F., 2011. “The real effects of debt”, Symposium “Achieving Maximum Long Run Growth”, Jackson Hole, Wy. (USA) 25–27 August. European Commission, 2012. “Fiscal sustainability Report 2012”, European Economy no 8, EC, Brussels. European Central Bank, 2011. “Ensuring Fiscal Sustainability in the Euro Area”, ECB Monthly Bulletin, April, p. 61-77. European Central Bank, 2012. “Analysing Government Debt Sustainability in the Euro Area”, ECB Monthly Bulletin, April, p. 55-69. Eurostat 2013a. Table: “General government gross debt 1995-2012” (last update: 21.11.2013) Eurostat 2013b. News Release “Euroindicators”, 153/2013 – 23 October. International Monetary Fund, 2013a. „Global Financial Stability Report”, IMF, Washington, October. International Monetary Fund, 2013b. „World Economic Outlook”, IMF, Washington, October. International Monetary Fund, 2013c. “Romania Request for Stand-by Arrangement”, Country Report, No. 13/307, IMF, Washington, October. International Monetary Fund, 2013d. “Staff Guidance Note for Public Debt Sustainability Analysis in Market-Access Countries”, Washington. Ministry of Public Finance, „Report on governement public debt management”, years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, MPF, Bucharest. Ministry of Public Finance „ The Strategy on governement public debt management”, periods 2008-2010, 2011-2013, 2012-2014, 2013-2015, MPF, Bucharest. Ministry of Public Finance, 2013a. „The structure of public in the period 2000 – 2012”, MPF, Bucharest. Ministry of Public Finance, 2013b. „projection of the governement public debt service in 2013-2018”, MPF, Bucharest. Reinhart C. M., Sbrancia B. M., 2011. “The Liquidation of Government Debt”, NBER Working Paper 16893, March. Standard and Poor’s, 2013. „Why Tax Pressure Matters As Much As GDP When Assessing A Sovereign Debt Sustainability”, S&P Rating Services, June. World Bank – IMF, 2009. “Developing a medium-term debt management strategy (MTDS): the analytical tool”, May. Zaman Gh., Georgescu G., 2011. “Sovereign risk and debt sustainability: warning levels for Romania” in: “Non-Linear Modelling in Economics. Beyond Standard Economics”, Expert Publishing House, p. 234-270. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/57256 |