Identity, Deprivation and Demand for Bifurcation of the State of Meghalaya

Nayak, Purusottam and Singha, Komol (2013): Identity, Deprivation and Demand for Bifurcation of the State of Meghalaya.

Abstract

The paper seeks to examine why the youths of the state of Meghalaya are forced into militancy and violence and are raising their demand for bifurcation of the state. To fulfil this objective first a brief description has been given on the formation of the state of Meghalaya. It is mentioned that unlike many other states in India that were created on linguistic basis, Meghalaya was carved out from Assam on the basis of ethnic identity. Though the state was created it continued to witness intolerance among various ethnic groups and between tribal and non-tribal population. The present demand for division of the state by Garos is another form of intolerance among ethnic groups within the state on linguistic basis. Garos feel that they are neglected and deprived by the Khasis, the major ethnic group in the state. The fact remains that it is not deprivation which is the root cause of dissension but intolerance among themselves and the so-called struggle for their identity and language. The authors argue that the more the ethnic groups stress on their differences the sharper will be the contours for conflict. There is a need to learn to live together and to solve their problems together. Since sharing of economic opportunities is the bone of contention between the two major ethnic groups, policy makers should stress on equitable distribution of development initiatives in the State. Bifurcation of such a small state is not the panacea for the present crisis.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Identity, deprivation, internal conflict, militancy, violence, Meghalaya, North East Region
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development

References

Baruah, Apurba K. (2004). Ethnic Conflicts and Traditional Self-Governing Institutions: A Study of Laitumkhrah Dorbar. Working Paper No. 39, Crisis States Programme, Development Research Centre, Destin, LSE, Houghton Street, London.

Das, Rani P. (2013). Assam and Meghalaya: Threats of Violence in Garo Heartland. Article No. 4192, November 26, 2013. Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, Guwahati.

Gohain, Hiren (2014). A Note on Recent Ethnic Violence in Assam. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(13): 19-22.

Hossain, Md. Kamal (2009). Fraternal Relative Deprivation of a Tribal Population in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Journal of Life Earth Science. 3(4): 29-32.

Hussain, Monirul (1987). Tribal Movement for Autonomous State in Assam. Economic and Political Weekly, 22(32): 1329-1332.

Haokip, Thongkholal (2013). Inter-ethnic Relations in Meghalaya. Asian Ethnicity, [accessed April 8, 2014: DOI: 10.1080/14631369.2013.853545]

Karna, M.N. (Undated). Identity Politics. [accessed: March 14, 2014: http://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Download/Jrp/pdf/133_7.pdf].

Mukhim, Patricia (2013). Non-tribals in Meghalaya– Non-citizens or Half Citizens? The Shillong Times, Friday, March 22, 2013.

Phukan, Mridula Dhekial (2013). Ethnicity, Conflict and Population Displacement in Northeast India. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2): 91-101.

The Assam Tribune (2013). New Forum to Espouse Separate State Demand. Guwahati: The Assam Tribune, Thursday, September 5, 2013 [accessed March 14, 2014: http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/detailsnew.asp?id=sep0513/state06]

Upadhyaya, Anjoo Sharan; Priyankar Upadhyaya and Ajay Kumar Yadav (2013). Interrogating Peace in Meghalaya. Core Policy Brief No. 03. Cultures of Governance and Conflict Resolution in Europe and India, Peace Research Institute, Oslo.