González Chapela, Jorge (2014): Disentangling income and price effects in the demand for time online.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_57302.pdf Download (174kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The large negative impact of income on time spent online has been attributed to a negative own-price effect created by variation in the opportunity cost of time across internet users. Nonetheless, the coefficient on income could also be capturing a negative income effect: High-income users could reduce time spent online to consume, for example, leisure activities of higher quality. This paper estimates a demand function for time online using a time-use survey containing information on household income and individual labor earnings. In accordance with the negative income effect hypothesis, income still exerts a large negative impact after earnings are controlled for, whereas the response to earnings is negative only in certain ranges of the earnings distribution.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Disentangling income and price effects in the demand for time online |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Internet usage; Shadow value of time; Spanish Time Use Survey; Type II Tobit model. |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L86 - Information and Internet Services ; Computer Software |
Item ID: | 57302 |
Depositing User: | Dr Jorge González Chapela |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jul 2014 20:11 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 00:54 |
References: | Aguiar, Mark, and Erik Hurst. 2007. Life-cycle prices and production. The American Economic Review 97(5):1533-1559. Amemiya, T. 1985. Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Becker, Gary S. 1965. A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal 75:493-517. Bound, John, Charles Brown, and Nancy Mathiowetz. 2001. Measurement error in survey data. In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5, ed. J.J. Heckman and E. Leamer. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V. Deaton, Angus, and John Muellbauer. 1980. Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge University Press, reprinted 1999. Eurostat. 2004. Guidelines on harmonized European time use surveys. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Feather, Peter M., and W. Douglass Shaw. 2000. The demand for leisure time in the presence of constrained work hours. Economic Inquiry 38(4):651-661. Fisher, Kimberly, Jonathan Gershuny, Evrim Altintas, and Anne H. Gauthier. 2012. Multinational Time Use Study. User’s Guide and Documentation. Version 5 – updated. University of Oxford. Goel, Rajeev K., Edward T. Hsieh, Michael A. Nelson, and Rati Ram. 2006. Demand elasticities for internet services. Applied Economics 38:975-980. Goldfarb, Avi, and Jeff Prince. 2008. Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Information Economics and Policy 20:2-15. Goolsbee, Austan, and Peter J. Klenow. 2006. Valuing consumer products by the time spent using them: An application to the Internet. The American Economic Review 96(2):108-113. Juster, F. Thomas. 1985. The validity and quality of time use estimates obtained from recall diaries. In Time, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by F. Thomas Juster and Frank P. Stafford, pp.63-92. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Juster, F. Thomas, Hiromi Ono, and Frank P. Stafford. 2003. An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology 33:19-54. Mincer, Jacob. 1963. Market prices, opportunity costs, and income effects. In Measurement in Economics: Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics in Memory of Yehuda Grunfeld, edited by C. Christ et al. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Orviska, Marta, and John Hudson. 2009. Dividing or uniting Europe? Internet usage in the EU. Information Economics and Policy 21:279-290. Pantea, Smaranda, and Bertin Martens. 2013. Has the digital divide been reversed? Evidence from five EU countries. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Digital Economy Working Paper 2013/06. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Phaneuf, Daniel J. 2011. Can consumption of convenience products reveal the opportunity cost of time? Economics Letters 113:92-95. Robinson, John P. 1985. The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In Time, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by F. Thomas Juster and Frank P. Stafford, pp.33-62. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. Sevilla, Almudena, Jose I. Gimenez-Nadal, and Jonathan Gershuny. 2012. Leisure inequality in the United States: 1965-2003. Demography 49(3):939-964. Small, Kenneth A., Clifford Winston, and Jia Yan. 2005. Uncovering the distribution of motorists’ preferences for travel time and reliability. Econometrica 73(4):1367-1382. Spanish Statistical Office. 2004. Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo 2002-2003 – Proyecto Metodológico y Resultados Nacionales. Madrid, Spanish Statistical Office. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, second edition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. Forthcoming. Quasi-Maximum likelihood estimation and testing for nonlinear models with endogenous explanatory variables. Journal of Econometrics. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/57302 |