It's All in the Timing:Household Expenditure and Labor Supply Responses to Unconditional Cash Transfers.

Bazzi, Samuel and Sumarto, Sudarno and Suryahadi, Asep (2013): It's All in the Timing:Household Expenditure and Labor Supply Responses to Unconditional Cash Transfers. Published in: SMERU Working Paper (22 December 2013)

Abstract

Targeted cash transfer programs have been an important policy tool in developing countries. This paper considers (i) how the timing of transfers affects household expenditure and labor supply responses, and (ii) how household expectations shape our interpretation of those responses. We study these issues in the context of a short-term program that provided quarterly unconditional transfers of US$30 to over 19 million households in Indonesia. Our empirical strategy relies on nationally representative panel data, difference-in-difference re-weighting estimators, and the staggered rollout of the second quarterly transfer. On average, beneficiary households that received the two full transfers by early 2006 did not differ from comparable nonbeneficiaries in terms of per capita expenditure growth and changes in labor supply per adult. However, beneficiaries still awaiting their second transfer reported a 7 percentage point lower expenditure growth and a reduction in labor supply by an additional 1.5 hours per adult per week. The expenditure differences dissipated by early 2007, several months after the final transfer were received by all beneficiaries. We also exploit variation in transfers per capita to identify a small marginal propensity to consume out of transfer income (around 0.10). We reconcile the empirical results with the predictions of a simple permanent income model, consider rival (missing) data-driven explanations, and document similar household responses to other transitory changes in income.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Household expenditure, unconditional cash transfer, Indonesia
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

References

Abadie, Alberto. (2005) ‘Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators.’ Review of Economic Studies 72 (1): 1–19.

Abadie, Alberto and Guido W. Imbens (2005) ‘Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.’ Econometrica 74 (1): 235–267.

Angrist, Joshua D. and Jörn-Steffen Pischke (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Attanasio, Orazio P., Costas Meghir, and Ana Santiago (2012) ‘Education Choices in Mexico: Using a Structural Model and a Randomized Experiment to Evaluate Progresa.’ The Review of Economic Studies 79 (1): 37–66.

Baird, Sarah, Craig McIntosh, and Berk Özler (2011) ‘Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment.’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 1709–1753.

Barrera-Osorio, Felipe, Marianne Bertrand, Leigh L. Linden, and Francisco Perez-Calle (2011) ‘Improving the Design of Conditional Transfer Programs: Evidence from a Randomized Education Experiment in Colombia’ American Economic Journal: Applied Economics’ 3 (2):167–195.

Bazzi, Samuel (2012) ‘Wealth Heterogeneity, Income Shocks, and International Migration.’ Unpublished Manuscript.

Bianchi, Milo and Matteo Bobba (forthcoming) ‘Liquidity, Risk, and Occupational Choices.’ Review of Economic Studies.

Busso, Matias, John DiNardo, and Justin McCrary (2009) ‘New Evidence on the Finite Sample Properties of Propensity Score Matching and Reweighting Estimators.’ IZA Discussion Papers.

———. (forthcoming) ‘Finite Sample Properties of Semiparametric Estimators of Average Treatment Effects.’ Journal of Business and Economic Statistics.

Cameron, Lisa. and Manisha Shah (2012) ‘Can Mistargeting Destroy Social Capital and Stimulate Crime? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Program in Indonesia.’ Unpublished Manuscript.

Carrillo, Paul E. and J. Ponce Jarrín (2009) ‘Efficient Delivery of Subsidies to the Poor: Improving the Design of a Cash Transfer Program in Ecuador.’ Journal of Development Economics 90 (2): 276–284.

Cattaneo, Matias D. (2010) ‘Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Multi-Valued Treatment Effects Under Ignorability.’ Journal of Econometrics 155 (2): 138–154.

Coady, David, Justin Tyson, John M. Piotrowski, Robert Gillingham, Rolando Ossowski, and Shamsuddin Tareq (2010) Petroleum Product Subsidies: Costly, Inequitable, and On the Rise. International Monetary Fund.

Crump, R.K., V. Joseph Hotz, Guido W. Imbens, and O.A. Mitnik (2009) ‘Dealing with Limited Overlap in Estimation of Average Treatment Effects.’ Biometrika 96 (1): 187–199.

Deaton, Angus (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Edmonds, Eric V. (2006) ‘Child Labor and Schooling Responses to Anticipated Income in South Africa.’ Journal of Development Economics 81 (2): 386–414.

Filmer, Deon and Norbert Schady (2011) ‘Does more cash in conditional cash transfer programs always lead to larger impacts on school attendance?’ Journal of Development Economics 96 (1): 150–157.

Firpo, Sergio (2007) ‘Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects,’ Econometrica 75 (1): 259–276.

Graham, Bryan S., Cristine Campos de Xavier Pinto, and Daniel Egel (2012) ‘Inverse Probability Tilting for Moment Condition Models with Missing Data.’ The Review of Economic Studies 79 (3): 1053–1079.

Hanlon, Joseph, David Hulme, and Armando Barrientos (2010) Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from The Global South. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.

Hastuti, Sumarto, Sudarno, Nina Toyamah, Syaikhu Usman, Bambang Sulaksono, Sri Budiyati, Wenefrida.D. Widyanti,

Meuthia Rosfadhila, Hariyanti Sadaly, Sufiet Erlita, Robert Justin. Sodo, and Sami Bazzi (2006) ‘A Rapid Appraisal of The Implementation of the 2005 Direct Cash Transfer Program in Indonesia: A Case Study in Five Kabupaten/Kota.’ Development Economics Working Papers.

Heckman, James J., Hidehiko Ichimura, and Petra Todd (1998) ‘Matching As an Econometric Evaluation Estimator.’ Review of Economic studies 65 (2): 261–294.

Hsieh, Chang-Tai (2003) ‘Do Consumers React to Anticipated Income Changes? Evidence from the Alaska Permanent Fund.’, American Economic Review 93 (1): 397–405.

Imbens, Guido W. (2000) ‘The Role of The Propensity Score In Estimating Dose-Response Functions.’ Biometrika 87 (3): 706–710.

Imbens, Guido and J.M. Wooldridge (2009) ‘Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation’ Journal of Economic Literature 47 (1): 5–86.

Janvry, Alain De and Elisabeth Sadoulet (2006) ‘Making Conditional Cash Transfer Programs More Efficient: Designing for Maximum Effect of the Conditionality.’ The World Bank Economic Review 20 (1): 1–29.

Jappelli, Tullio and Luigi Pistaferri (2010) ‘The Consumption Response to Income Changes.’Annual Review of Economics 2: 479–506.

Kaboski, Joseph P. and Robert M. Townsend (2005 ) ‘Policies and Impact: An Analysis of Village-Level Microfinance Institutions.’ Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (1): 1–50.

———. (2011) ‘A Structural Evaluation of a Large-Scale Quasi-Experimental Microfinance Initiative.’ Econometrica 79 (5): 1357–1406.

Klein, Roger W. and Richard H. Spady (1993) ‘An Efficient Semiparametric Estimator for Binary Response Models.’ Econometrica 61: 387–421.

McCulloch, Neil (2008) “Rice Prices and Poverty in Indonesia,” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 44 (1): 45–64.

Olken, Benjamin A. (2006) ‘Corruption and the Costs of Redistribution: Micro Evidence From Indonesia.’ Journal of Public Economics 90 (4): 853–870.

Paxson, Christina H. (1992) ‘Using Weather Variability to Estimate the Response of Savings to Transitory Income in Thailand.’ The American Economic Review 82: 15–33.

Pradhan, Menno (2009) ‘Welfare Analysis with a Proxy Consumption Measure: Evidence from a Repeated Experiment in Indonesia’ Fiscal Studies 30 (3–4): 391–417.

Sahm, Claudia R., Matthew D. Shapiro, and Joel Slemrod (2012) ‘Check in the Mail or More in the Paycheck: Does the Effectiveness of Fiscal Stimulus Depend on How It Is Delivered?’ American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4 (3): 216–250.

Shapiro, Matthew D. and Joel Slemrod (1995) ‘Consumer Response to the Timing of Income: Evidence from a Change in Tax Withholding.’ American Economic Review 85 (1): 274–283.

Shapiro, Matthew D. and Joel Slemrod (2009) ‘Did the 2008 Tax Rebates Stimulate Spending?’ American Economic Review 99 (2): 374–379.

Simatupang, Pantjar and Charles P. Timmer (2008)‘Indonesian Rice Production: Policies and Realities.’ Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 44 (1): 65–80.

Souleles, Nicholas S (1999) ‘The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds.’ The American Economic Review, 89 (4): 947–958.