Economic Centrality: How Much is Economics and How Much is Geography?

Crespo, Nuno and Fontoura, M. Paula and Simoes, Nadia (2014): Economic Centrality: How Much is Economics and How Much is Geography?

Abstract

Proximity to the markets is a key determinant of the location of firms because distance still matters, as recently reported in the literature. Based on an adapted version of the most standard centrality index we propose a decomposition method that allows isolating the influence of: (i) internal and external factors; (ii) economic and geographical aspects. In order to illustrate our methodology we consider data for 171 countries. This empirical work leads to the conclusion that the centrality level of the countries derives from different sources, therefore requiring different policy interventions in order to improve it.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: centrality, peripherality, economic geography, distance
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R30 - General

References

Anderson, J. and van Wincoop, E. 2003, ‘Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle’, American Economic Review, vol. 93, pp. 170-192.

Battersby, B. and Ewing, R. 2005, ‘International trade performance: The gravity of Australia’s remoteness’, Treasury Working Paper No. 2005-03.

Berthelon, M. and Freund, C. 2008, ‘On the conservation of distance in international trade’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 75, pp. 310-320.

Blainey, G. 1966, The tyranny of distance: How distance shaped Australia’s history, Sun Books, Melbourne.

Brülhart, M. 2001, ‘Evolving geographical concentration of European manufacturing industries’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 137, pp. 215-243.

Brülhart, M. 2006, ‘The fading attraction of central regions: An empirical note on core-periphery gradients in Western Europe’, Spatial Economic Analysis, vol. 1, pp. 227-235.

Brülhart, M. and Traeger, R. 2005, ‘An account of geographic concentration patterns in Europe’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 35, pp. 597-624.

Chen, N. 2004, ‘Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: Why do national borders matter?’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 63, pp. 93-118.

Copus, A. 1999, ‘Peripherality index for the NUTS III regions of the European Union’, Report for the European Commission, ERDF/FEDER Study, 98, 00-27-130.

Crespo, N. Fontoura, M. 2006, ‘Economic centrality, per capita income and human capital – some results at regional and local level in 275 counties of Portugal’, Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, vol. 6.

Disdier, A. and Head, K. 2008, ‘The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 90, pp. 37-48.

Fujita, M., Krugman, P. and Venables, A. 1999, The spatial economy: Cities, regions and international trade, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Gutiérrez, J. and Urbano, P. 1996, ‘Accessibility in the European Union: The impact of the trans-European road network’, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 4, pp. 15-25.

Head, K. and Mayer, T. 2000, ‘Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 136, pp. 284-314.

Head, K. and Mayer, T. 2002, ‘Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade’, CEPII Working Papers No. 2002-01.

Head, K. and Mayer, T. 2004, ‘Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 86, pp. 959-972.

Head, K. and Mayer, T. 2013, ‘What separates us? Sources of resistance to globalization’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 46, pp. 1196-1231.

Helliwell, J. and Verdier, G. 2001, ‘Measuring internal trade distances: A new method applied to estimate provincial border effects in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 34, pp. 1024-1041.

Keeble, D., Offord, J. and Walker, S. 1988, ‘Peripheral regions in a community of twelve Member States’, Report for the European Commission, Brussels.

Keeble, D., Owens, P. and Thompson, C. 1982, ‘Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European Community’, Regional Studies, vol. 16, pp. 419-432.

Krugman, P. 1993, ‘First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location’, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 33, pp.129-144.

Linneker, B. 1996, ‘Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development: The regional development effects of the M25 London Orbital Motorway’, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 4, pp. 77-92.

Mayer, T. and Zignago, S. 2011, ‘Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: The Geodist Database’, CEPII Working Papers No. 2011-25.

Melitz, J. 2007, ‘North, south and distance in the gravity model’, European Economic Review, vol. 51, pp. 971-991.

Melitz, M. 2003, ‘The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica, vol. 71, pp. 1695-1725.

Nitsch, V. 2000, ‘National borders and international trade: Evidence from the European Union’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 33, pp. 1091-1105.

Ottaviano, G. 2008, ‘Infrastructure and economic geography: An overview of theory and evidence’, European Investment Bank Papers, vol. 13, pp. 8-35.

Redding, S. and Schott, P. 2003, ‘Distance, skill deepening and development: Will peripheral countries ever get rich?’, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 72, pp. 515-541.

Redding, S. and Venables, A. 2004, ‘Economic geography and international inequality’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 62, pp. 53-82.

Schürmann, C. and Talaat, A. 2000, ‘Towards a European Peripherality Index’, Report for General Directorate XVI Regional Policy of the European Commission.

Spiekermann, K. and Neubauer, J. 2002, ‘European accessibility and peripherality: Concepts, models and indicators’, Nordregio Working Paper No. 2002:9.

Wolf, H. 1997, ‘Patterns of intra- and inter-state trade’, NBER Working Paper No. 5939.

Wolf, H. 2000, ‘Intranational home bias in trade’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 82, pp. 555-556.