A Note on Trade Costs and Distance

Lawless, Martina and Whelan, Karl (2007): A Note on Trade Costs and Distance.

Abstract

One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong negative effect on trade. Bernard, Jensen, Redding, and Schott (2007) discuss how this can be decomposed into an effect due to the number of products and an effect due to average exports per product. Using US firm-level data, they show that distance has a strong negative effect on the number of products exported. However, they find that the intensive margin—average sales of individual products—is increasing with distance. We show that this apparently puzzling finding is consistent with models featuring firm heterogeneity in productivity and fixed costs associated with exporting to each market. We also show how evidence of this type can be used to derive new estimates of how distance affects fixed and variable trade costs and how these two costs combine to generate the distance effect on trade.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade

References

[1] Anderson, James and Eric van Wincoop (2003). “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle,” American Economic Review, 93, 170-92. [2] Anderson, James and Eric van Wincoop (2004). “Trade Costs,” Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 691-751. [3] Axtell, Robert (2001). “Zipf Distribution of US Firm Sizes,” Science, 7 September 2001, pp.1818-1820. [4] Bernard, Andrew, Stephen Redding, and Peter Schott (2006). “Multiproduct Firms and Trade Liberalization,” mimeo, Dartmouth. [5] Bernard, Andrew, Stephen Redding, and Peter Schott (2007). “Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms,” Review of Economic Studies Vol.74, pp.31-66. [6] Bernard, Andrew, J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen Redding, and Peter Schott (2007). “Firms in International Trade,” forthcoming, Journal of Economic Perspectives. [7] Chaney, Thomas (2007). “Distorted Gravity: Heterogeneous Firms, Market Structure and the Geography of International Trade” mimeo, University of Chicago. [8] Eaton, Jonathan and Samuel Kortum (2002). “Technology, Geography and Trade” Econometrica 70(5) pp. 1741-1779. [9] Eaton, Jonathan, Samuel Kortum and Francis Kramarz (2004). “Dissecting Trade: Firms, Industries and Export Destinations,” American Economic Review Vol. 94, No.2, pp. 150-152. [10] Eckel, Carsten and J. Peter Neary (2006). “Multi-Product Firms and Flexible Manufacturing in the Global Economy,” mimeo, Nuffield College, Oxford. [11] Gabaix, Xavier (1999). “Zipf’s Law for Cities: An Explanation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.114, No.3, pp.739-67. [12] Helpman, Elhanen, Marc Melitz, and Stephen Yeaple (2004). “Export versus FDI with Heterogenous Firms,” American Economic Review, Vol. 94, 300-316. 14 [13] Helpman, Elhanen, Marc Melitz, and Yona Rubinstein (2007). “Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes,” NBER Working Paper No. 12927. [14] Hummels, David (2001). “Towards a Geography of Trade Costs,” mimeo, Purdue. [15] Hummels, David (2007). “Transportation Costs and International Trade Over Time,” forthcoming, Journal of Economic Perspectives. [16] Kortum, Samuel (1997). “Research, Patenting and Technological Change,” Econometrica Vol.65, No.6, pp. 1389-1419. [17] Lawless, Martina (2007). “Firm Export Dynamics and the Geography of Trade,” Working Paper 2/RT/07, Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland. [18] Melitz, Marc (2003). “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity”, Econometrica Vol. 71, No.6, pp. 1695-1725.