Social fairness and sustainability of economic productivity

Mihai, Iris (2014): Social fairness and sustainability of economic productivity. Published in: International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Manaagement , Vol. 2, No. 8 (15 August 2014): pp. 1-15.

Abstract

Economic productivity is a complex phenomenon that serves to highlight how efficient an economic process is. However, the existing paradigms for measuring productivity are not coherent, presenting us with a heterogeneous concept too scattered to prove significant for the policy makers. In this paper, we focus on the social implications of the economic development in our attempt to design an adequate measuring methodology able to capture the impact of the continuously growing productivity upon the quality of life in the selected countries. The research is based on statistical data provided by EU KLEMS, The World Bank, Eurostat and The New Maddison Project. The countries chosen for the empirical analysis belong to two groups: Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) and the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland and Sweden). The research is based on input-output indexes used to emphasize productivity, together with its social fairness component and its sustainability over time. The fundamental research hypothesis of this paper is whether the current economic productivity, socially adjusted by GINI, is sustainable. The secondary hypothesis is whether high levels of economic productivity represent a strong enough incentive to countervail the limited biocapacity of a country. The empirical analysis will answer both questions, highlighting the importance of the ecological reserves and the importance of addressing productivity also from a social and an environmental perspective, and not only the obsolete economic perspective.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: economic productivity, social fairness, biocapacity, sustainability
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F62 - Macroeconomic Impacts; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F63 - Economic Development

References

Antle, M. J. & Capalbo, S. (1988). An introduction to recent development in production theory and productivity measurement in S. Capalbo & M.J. Antle (Eds.), Agricultural productivity. Measurement and explanation, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 17–95.

Bennet, T. L. (1920). The Theory of Measurement of Changes in Cost of Living. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1920; 83, 455–462.

Caves D. W, Christensen L. R. & Diewert W. E. (1982). Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers. Economic Journal 92(365), 73–86.

Chambers, Robert. A New Look at Exact Input, Output, Productivity and Technical Change Measurement, mimeo, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park; 1996 in Machek, O. & Hnilica, J. (2012). Total Factor Productivity Approach in Competitive and Regulated World, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 57 (2012), 223 – 230.

Diewert, W. E. (1992). Fisher ideal output, input and productivity indexes revisited. Journal of Productivity Analysis 1992; 3, 211–248.

Durdyeva, S., Ihtiyarb, A., Ismailc, S., Ahmadd, F. S. & Bakare, N. A. (2014). Productivity and Service Quality: Factors Affecting in Service Industry, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 109 (2014), 487 – 491.

Fisher, I. (1922). The Making of Index Numbers;Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S., Portney, P. & Stavins, R. (1995). Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing:What Does the Evidence Tell Us?, Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 132-163.

Lall, P., Featherstone, A. M. & Norman, D. W. (2002). Productivity growth in the Western Hemisphere (94): the Caribbean in perspective. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 213-231.

Machek, O. & Hnilica, J. (2012). Total Factor Productivity Approach in Competitive and Regulated World, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 57 (2012), 223 – 230.

Manoilescu, M. (1986). Forţele naţionale productive şi comerţul exterior, Teoria protecţionismului şi a schimbului international; Bucureşti: Editura Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001). What services for what society? How should the services provided by financial intermediaries in a modern society be measured?, Paris: STD/NA 13.

Samuelson, P. & Nordhaus, W. (1995). Economics (15th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tolentini, A. (2004). New concepts of productivity and its improvement. European productivity network seminar, Budapest.

Törnqvist L. The Bank of Finland's Consumption Price Index. Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin 1936; 10:1–8 in Machek, O. & Hnilica, J. (2012). Total Factor Productivity Approach in Competitive and Regulated World, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 57 (2012), 223 – 230.

Zhao, C. (2012). Does Regulation on CO2 Emissions Influence Productivity Growth? The Empirical Test Based on DEA Analysis, Energy Procedia 16 (2012), 667-672