Irawati, DESSY (2007): Strengthening Cluster Building in Developing Country alongside the Triple Helix: Challenge for Indonesian Clusters - A Case Study of the Java Region.
Download (172kB) | Preview
This paper is a component of my conceptual foundation paper due to PhD field work in Indonesia to understand the possibility and the chance for developing country such as Indonesia to strengthen cluster building alongside The Triple Helix model within the region of Java. This paper is a conceptual paper based on case study in Indonesia related to the Triple Helix and cluster approach for chosen Industrial Clusters in Java. In this paper, the focus will be on six selected industrial clusters across the Java region. They are Gresik Industrial District in East Java, Tugu Wijaya Semarang in Central Java, Sentul Bogor in West Java, Jababeka in Bekasi, Kujang Industrial District, and Kawasan Berikat Nusantara in Jakarta. In conjunction with the fact in Indonesian industrial condition, Indonesian government initiated the setting up of industrial district which later known as 2 industrial cluster to make existence easier for both domestic and international investors by providing all necessary infrastructure, facilities and housing in one safe location - at a reasonable cost - thus providing a secure base for industry and manufacturing. Regarding clustering approach, Indonesia has a very long tradition of SMEs (Small and Medium Sized Enterprises) cluster around similar activities. In 2002, the cluster comprised approximately 3700 firms mostly SMEs employing 58.000 permanent workers (Loebis and Schmitz, 2005). They are usually craft industries and export oriented driven. About 70% of the cluster production is exported while the rest is sold on the domestic markets. However, little is known about the critical success factors that determine economic development of cities and regions and empirical studies that draw lessons for policy are scarce (Tichy, 1998), specifically for implementing cluster approach in industry/manufacturing sector in Indonesia. Moreover, there are good reasons to doubt to what extent a purely sectoral view is adequate to analyse region economic growth and to design policies. There are many indications that urban economic growth increasingly seems to emerge from fruitful cooperation between economic actors, who form innovative networks. It is in these geographically concentrated network configurations, or ‘cluster’ that value-added and employment growth in urban regions is realised. This demands a new policy approach in urban economic development, specifically for Indonesian study. Accordingly, it is motivating to investigate the process of cluster building in industrial district in Java region as the important region due to economic, social, and political condition. Thus, details can be read in the following section within this paper.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Strengthening Cluster Building in Developing Country alongside the Triple Helix: Challenge for Indonesian Clusters - A Case Study of the Java Region|
|Keywords:||Cluster, Triple Helix, SMEs,|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies|
|Depositing User:||DESSY IRAWATI|
|Date Deposited:||20. Nov 2007 09:29|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 05:03|
Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1996) “Research & Development Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production”, American Economic Review, 86, pp. 630-640.
Burton, D. (2000) Research training for social scientists, London: Sage.
Berry, A., Rodriguez, E., Sandee, H. (2001) “Small and Medium Enterprises Dynamic in Indonesia”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37:3, pp. 363-368.
Chaminade, C., Vang, Jang. (2006) Innovation Policy for Asian SMEs: Exploring Cluster Differences, paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 18-20, 2006.
Etzkowitz, H. & Mello, J. M. C. D. (1994) “The Rise of Triple Helix Cluster: Innovation in Brazilian Economic and Social Development”, International Journal of Technology and Management & Sustainable Development, 2:3, pp. 159-171.
Gnuschke, J. (2001) Intellectual Property and Economic Development, Business Perspective, Summer/Fall.
Harrison, B., Kelley, M., & Grant, J. (1996) “Innovative Firm Behaviour and Local Millie: Exploring the Intersection of Agglomeration, Firm Effects, Industrial Organization, and Technological Change”, Economic Geography, 72, pp. 233-258.
Hill, H. (2001) “Small and Medium Enterprises”, Indonesia Asian Survey, 41: 2, pp. 248-270.
Hughes, T. (1987) The Evolution of Large Technological Systems, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Irfan, H. K., JRJ.M, D., Manullang, S. and Dou, H. (2004) Developing Competitive Technical Intelligence, Indonesia Technovation, 24, pp. 995-999.
Kuncoro, M (2001) Why Manufacturing Industry Persisted to Cluster Spatially in Java, paper presented at International Conference Location of Economic Activity, Regional Development and the Global Economy, University of Le Havre, France, 26-27 September, 2001.
Loebis, L., Schmitz, H. (2005) Java Furniture Makers: Globalisation winners or losers?, Development in Practice, 15: 3-4, pp. 514-521.
Jaffe, A., Trajtnberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993) “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced By Patents Citations”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, pp. 577-598.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), (2004) The Study on Strengthening Capacity of SMEs Clusters in Indonesia: Final Report with Republic of Indonesia Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs, Ministry of Industry and Trade, and Sate Ministry of Cooperatives, Small and Medimum Enterprises, Jakarta: KRI International Corp.
Leydersdoff, L., Van den Basselaar, P. (1997) “Technological development and factor substitution in a complex dynamic system”, Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems.
Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.
Nelson, R. R.,Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economics Change, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Porter, M. E. (2000) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.
Porter, M. E. (1998) “Cluster and the New Economic of Competition”, Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp. 78-90.
Shinn, T. (1997) Instrument Hierarchies: Laboratories, Industry and Divisions of Labour, Macmillan, London.
Soehendro, B. (1998) Deregulasi Perguruan Tinggi Dalam Memasuki Pasar Bebas, Jakarta: Nasional Manajemen Stratejik Perguruan Tinggi.
Tambunan, T. (2005) “Promoting Small and Medium Enterprises with a Clustering Approach: A Policy Experience from Indonesia”, Journal of Small Business Management, 43:2, pp. 138-154.
The Central Bureau of Statistics Available at: www.bps.go.id (Accessed: 25 December, 2006).
Turpin, T., Sullivan, N. and Deville, A., (1993) Crossing Innovation Boundaries: The Formation and Maintenance of Research Links between Industry and Universities in Australia, Canberra: AGPS.
Yin, R. K. (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London: Sage.