Capital mobility in the panel GMM framework: Evidence from EU members

Ketenci, Natalya (2014): Capital mobility in the panel GMM framework: Evidence from EU members.

Abstract

This paper examines the level of capital mobility in European Union members using the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation technique developed by Hansen (1982). This study investigates the validity of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle within the GMM framework and the impact of the global financial crisis on the level of capital mobility in EU members. In general, the world countries with time have a tendency to a higher level of capital market openness. According to Feldstein and Horioka (1980), a higher saving-investment correlation is related to lower capital mobility. In this paper, panel data for 27 European countries were used for the period of 1995-2013 on the quarterly basis. The empirical results provide evidence of high capital mobility in EU members, obtaining a low value of a saving retention coefficient. The results of estimations indicate significant dependence of investments on its past values. It is found that the global financial crisis had a deeply negative impact on investment rates during the first three quarters of 2008, followed by a recovery in the last quarter. The empirical results indicate that the level of capital mobility increased in the first three quarters and decreased in the fourth quarter of 2008 compared to estimations without dummies. Thus increase in investments and decrease in the international capital mobility level of European countries in the last quarter of 2008 indicate a relative increase in domestic capital flows, taking into account high risk in the international market.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Capital mobility, Feldstein-Horioka puzzle, saving-investment association, generalized method of moments (GMM), EU, panel data.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F32 - Current Account Adjustment ; Short-Term Capital Movements

References

Adedeji, O. & Thornton, J. (2008). International capital mobility: Evidence from panel cointegration tests. Economics Letters, 99, 349-352.

Apergis, N., & Tsoumas, C. (2009). A survey on the Feldstein Horioka puzzle: What has been done and where we stand. Research in Economics,63, 64-76.

Artis, M., & Bayoumi, T. (1991). Global financial integration and current account imbalances. In:

Alogoskoufis, G., Papademos, L. & Portes, R. (Eds.). External constraints on Macroeconomic Policy: The European Experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Baldwin, R. (2009), “The Great Trade Collapse: What Caused it and What does it mean?”, in “The Great Trade Collapse: Causes, Consequences, and Prospects”, R. Baldwin ed., Voxeu E book.

Banerjee, A. & Zanghieri, P. (2003). A new look at the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle using an integrated panel. CEPII Working Paper, 22.

Broner, F., Didier, T., Erce, A. & Schmukler, S.L. (2013). Gross capital flows: Dynamics and crises. Journal of Monetary Economics, 60: 113-133.

Choi, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249-272.

Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., & Smith, R. (1998). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle and capital mobility: A review. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 3, 169-188.

Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T.J., & Stock, J.H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica, 64, 813-836.

Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit root in heterogenous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.

Levin, A., Lin, C.F. and C.S.J. Chu (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometric, 108(1), 1-24.

Feldstein, M., & Bachetta, P. (1991). National saving and international investment. In: Bernheim, D., & Shoven, J. (Eds.). National Saving and Economic Perfomance. The University of Chicago Press.

Feldstein, M., & Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic saving and international capital flows. Economic Journal, 90, 314–329.

Frankel, J. A. (1992). Measuring international capital mobility – A review. American Economic Review, 82, 197-202.

Fratzscher, M. (2011). Capital flows, push versus pull factors and the global financial crisis. Working Paper Series, 1364, July. European Central Bank.

Fouquau, J., Hurlin, C., & Rabaud, I. (2008). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: A panel smooth transition regression approach. Economic Modelling, 25, 284-299.

Georgopoulos, G. & Hejazi, W. (2009). The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle revisited: Is the home-bias much less? International Review of Economics & Finance, 18(2), 341-350.

González, A., Teräsvirta, T., & van Dijk, D. (2005). Panel smooth transition regression model.Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, 604.

Gregory, A.W., & Hansen, B.E. (1996). Tests for cointegration in models with trend and regime shifts. Oxford Bulletin for Economics and Statistics, 58(3), 555-560.

Hadri, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogenous panel data. Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 148-161.

Ho, T.W. (2002). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited. Journal of International Money and Finance, 21, 555-564.

Ho, T.W. (2003). The saving-retention coefficient and country-size: The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle reconsidered. Journal of Macroeconomics, 25, 387-396.

Kejriwal, M. (2008). Cointegration with structural breaks: An application to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 12(1), article 3.

Ketenci, N. (2012). The Feldstein –Horioka Puzzle and Structural Breaks: Evidence from EU Members. Economic Modelling, 29(2), 262-270.

Ketenci, N. (2013). The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle in groupings of OECD members: a panel approach. Research in Economics, 67(1), March, 76-87.

Kollias, C., Mylonidis, N. & Paleologou, S.M. (2008). International Review of Economics and Finance, 17, 380-387.

Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B, Schmidt, P. and Y. Shin (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 44, 159-178.

Maddala, G.S. & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.

Mastroyiannis, A. (2007). Current account dynamics and the Feldstein and Horioka puzzle: the case of Greece. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 4(1), 91-99.

Miles-Ferretti, G.M. & Tille, C. (2011). The great retrenchment: international capital flows during the global financial crisis. Economic Policy, 26(66): 289-346.

Narayan, P.K. & Narayan, S. (2010). Testing for capital mobility: New evidence from a panel of G7 countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(1), 15-23.

Obstfeld, M., Rogoff, K., 2000. The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: is there a common cause? NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15, 340–390.

Ozmen, E. & Parmaksız, K. (2003). Policy regime change and the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: the UK evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25, 137-149.

Poulsen, L. S. & Hufbauer, G.C. (2011). Foreign direct investment in times of crisi. Working Paper Series, WP 11-3, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington.

Rao, B.B., Tamazian, A. & Kumar, S. (2010). Systems GMM estimates of the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle for the OECD countries and tests for structural breaks. Economic Modelling, 27, 1269-1273.

Said, S.E., and D.A. Dickey. 1984. Testing for unit roots in autoregressive – moving average model of unknown order. Biometrica 71: 599-608.

Telatar, E., Telatar, F., & Bolatoglu, N. (2007). A regime switching approach to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: Evidence from some European countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(3), 523-533.

Tesar, L.L. (1991). Saving, investment and international capital flows. Journal of International Economics 31, 55–78.