Effects of Agricultural Productivity Shocks on Female Labor Supply: Evidence from the Boll Weevil Plague in the US South

Ager, Philipp and Brückner, Markus and Herz, Benedikt (2014): Effects of Agricultural Productivity Shocks on Female Labor Supply: Evidence from the Boll Weevil Plague in the US South.

Abstract

In the beginning of the 1890s, counties located in the Cotton Belt of the American South were hit by an agricultural plague, the boll weevil, that adversely affected cotton production and hence the demand for labor. We use variation in the incidence of the boll weevil multiplied with counties’ initial cotton share to construct instrumental variables estimates of the labor supply curve. Controlling for county and state-by-time fixed effects, we find a significant positive response of labor supply to changes in labor income. The effect is particularly large for females, consistent with evidence that females had a comparative advantage in picking cotton.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Labor Supply, Female Labor Force Participation, Agricultural Productivity Shocks, US South, Boll Weevil
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure; N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy; N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy > N31 - U.S. ; Canada: Pre-1913

References

Aiken, Charles S., The Cotton Plantation South since the Civil War, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.

Alston, L. J., “Issues in postbellum southern agriculture,” in L. Ferlenger, ed., Agriculture and National Development: Views on the Nineteenth Century, Ames: Iowa State Univ. Press, 1990, pp. 207–228.

Alston, Lee J. and Kyle D. Kauffman, “Agricultural chutes and ladders: new estimates of sharecroppers and “true tenants” in the South, 1900–1920,” The Journal of Economic History, 1997, 57 (02), 464–475.

_______ and Robert Higgs, “Contractual mix in southern agriculture since the CivilWar: Facts, hypotheses, and tests,” The Journal of Economic History, 1982, 42 (02), 327–353.

American Life Histories, “Always Agin It,” 1939.

Baker, Richard B., “From the Field to the Classroom: The Boll Weevil’s Impact on Education in Rural Georgia,” Mimeo, 2013.

Blake, Kellee, “1st in th Path of th Fieme - The Fate of the 1890 Population Census,” Prologue-Quarterly of th National Archives, 1996, 28 (1), 64–81.

Bleakley, Hoyt, “Disease and development: evidence from hookworm eradication in the American South,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007, 122 (1), 73.

Blundell, Richard and Thomas Macurdy, “Chapter 27 Labor supply: a review of alternative approaches,” in Orley C. Ashenfelter and David Card, ed., Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. Volume 3, Part A, Elsevier, 1999, pp. 1559–1695.

Boustan, Leah Platt and William J. Collins, “The Origin and Persistence of Black-White Differences in Women’s Labor Force Participation,” in “Human Capital in History: The American Record,” University of Chicago Press, 2013.

Chetty, Raj, Adam Guren, Day Manoli, and Andrea Weber, “Does Indivisible Labor Explain the Difference between Micro and Macro Elasticities? A Meta-Analysis of Extensive Margin Elasticities,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, January 2013, 27 (1), 1–56.

Cogan, John, “The decline in black teenage employment: 1950-70,” The American Economic Review, 1982, pp. 621–638.

Costa, Dora L., “From Mill Town to Board Room: The Rise of Women’s Paid Labor,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000, pp. 101–122.

Eissa, Nada, “Taxation and labor supply of married women: the Tax Reform Act of 1986 as a natural experiment,” NBER Working Paper, 5023, 1995.

_____, and Jeffrey B. Liebman, “Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1996, 111 (2), 605–637.

FAO, “Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ v3. 0): Model Documentation,” International Institute for Applied systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg. Rome, Italy: Austria and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2012.

Feldstein, Martin, “The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: a panel study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act,” Journal of Political Economy, 1995, pp. 551–572.

Fenton, Frederick Azel and Erastus Waldon Dunnam, “Biology of the Cotton Boll Weevil at Florence, South Carolina,” Technical Report, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 1929.

Fernández, Raquel, “Cultural change as learning: The evolution of female labor force participation over a century,” The American Economic Review, 2013, 103 (1), 472–500.

_______, and Alessandra Fogli, “Culture: An Empirical Investigation of Beliefs, Work, and Fertility,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2009, pp. 146–177.

Fishback, Price V., Werner Troesken, Trevor Kollmann, Michael Haines, Paul W. Rhode, and Melissa Thomasson, “Information and the impact of climate and weather on mortality rates during the Great Depression,” in “The Economics of Climate Change: Adaptations Past and Present,” University of Chicago Press, 2011, pp. 131–167.

Giesen, J. C., Boll Weevil Blues, University of Chicago Press, IL, 2011.

Giesen, James Conrad, “The South’s Greatest Enemy?: The Cotton Boll Weevil and Its Lost Revolution, 1892-1930.” PhD dissertation, University of Georgia 2004.

Goldin, Claudia, “Female labor force participation: The origin of black and white differences, 1870 and 1880,” The Journal of Economic History, 1977, 37 (01), 87–108.

______, Understanding the gender gap: An economic history of American women, Oxford University Press, 1990.

______, “The Quiet Revolution That Transformed Women’s Employment, Education, and Family,” The American Economic Review, 2006, 96 (2), 1–21.

______, and Kenneth Sokoloff, “The Relative Productivity Hypothesis of Industrialization: The American Case, 1820 to 1850,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984, 99 (3).

Goolsbee, Austan, It’s Not About The Money: Why Natural Experiments Don’t Work On the Rich in Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing The Rich. Joel Slemrod, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass), 2002.

Gruber, Jon and Emmanuel Saez, “The elasticity of taxable income: evidence and implications,” Journal of Public Economics, 2002, 84 (1), 1–32.¨

Haines, Michael R., ICPSR. 2010.“Historical, Demographic, Economic, and Social Data: The United States, 1790-2002.” ICPSR study ICPSR02896-v3 2010.

Heinicke, Craig, “African-American migration and mechanized cotton harvesting, 1950-1960,” Explorations in Economic History, 1994, 31 (4), 501–520.

Higgs, Robert, “The Boll Weevil, the Cotton Economy, and Black Migration 1910-1930,” Agricultural History, 1976, pp. 335–350.

Hong, Keumsoo, “The Geography of Time and Labor in the Late Antebellum American Rural South: Fin-de-Servitude Time Consciousness, Contested Labor, and Plantation Capitalism,” International Review of Social History, 2001, 46 (01), 1–27.

Hornbeck, Richard and Suresh Naidu, “When the Levee Breaks: Black Migration and Economic Development in the American South,” The American Economic Review, 2014, 104 (3), 963–990.

Hunter, Walter David and Bert R. Coad, The boll-weevil problem number USDA Farmers’ Bulletin 1329, US Dept. of Agriculture, 1923.

Hyslop, James Augustus, Losses occasioned by insects, mites and ticks in the United States E-444 1938.

Jones, Jacqueline, Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family from Slavery to the Present, Basic Books New York, 1985.

Keane, Michael and Richard Rogerson, “Micro and Macro Labor Supply Elasticities: A Reassessment of Conventional Wisdom,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2012, 50 (2), 464–476.

Keane, Michael P., “Labor Supply and Taxes: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2011, 49 (4), 961–1075.

Killingsworth, Mark R. and James J. Heckman, “Chapter 2 Female labor supply: A survey,” in Orley C. Ashenfelter and Richard Layard, ed., Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. Volume 1, Elsevier, 1986, pp. 103–204.

Lange, Fabian, Alan L. Olmstead, and Paul W. Rhode, “The Impact of the Boll Weevil, 1892–1932,” The Journal of Economic History, 2009, 69 (03), 685–718.

Liebman, Jeffrey and Emmanuel Saez, “Earning Responses to Increases in Payroll Taxes,” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research 2006.

Lindsey, Lawrence B., “Individual taxpayer response to tax cuts: 1982–1984: with implications for the revenue maximizing tax rate,” Journal of Public Economics, 1987, 33 (2), 173–206.

Mankiw, N. Gregory, Principles of Macroeconomics, 7th Edition, 7th edition ed., Mason, OH: Cengage Learning, 2014.

Manski, Charles F., “Income tax and labour supply: Let’s acknowledge what we don’t know,” 2012.

Metzer, Jacob, “Rational management, modern business practices, and economies of scale in the ante-bellum southern plantations,” Explorations in Economic History, 1975, 12 (2), 123–150.

Meyer, Bruce D., “Labor supply at the extensive and intensive margins: The EITC, welfare, and hours worked,” American Economic Review, 2002, pp. 373–379.

_____, and Dan T. Rosenbaum, “Welfare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and the Labor Supply of Single Mothers,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, pp. 1063–1114.

Musoke, Moses S., “Mechanizing cotton production in the American south: The tractor, 1915–1960,” Explorations in Economic History, 1981, 18 (4), 347–375.

Nunn, Nathan and Nancy Qian, “The Potato’s Contribution to Population and Urbanization: Evidence From A Historical Experiment,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2011, 126 (2), 593–650.

Osband, Kent, “The BollWeevil Versus “King Cotton”,” The Journal of Economic History, 1985, 45 (03), 627–643.

Pencavel, John, “Labor supply of men: a survey,” Handbook of Labor Economics, 1986, 1, 3–102.

Ransom, Roger L., Conflict and compromise: the political economy of slavery, emancipation and the American Civil War, Cambridge University Press, 1989.

______, and Richard Sutch, One kind of freedom: The economic consequences of emancipation, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

Reid, Joseph D., “Sharecropping as an understandable market response: The post-bellum south,” The Journal of Economic History, 1973, 33 (01), 106–130. Rotella, Elyce J., “Women’s labor force participation and the decline of the family economy in the United States,” Explorations in Economic History, 1980, 17 (2), 95–117.

Ruggles, Steven, Trent Alexander, Sarah Flood, Katie Genadek, Matthew B. Schroeder, Brandon Trampe, Rebecca Vick, and M King, “Integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: Version 3.0.[machine-readable database],” Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2010, 20.

Sharpless, Rebecca, Fertile ground, narrow choices: Women on Texas cotton farms, 1900-1940, UNC Press Books, 1999.

Shlomowitz, Ralph, “The origins of Southern sharecropping,” Agricultural History, 1979, pp. 557–575.

_______, “"Bound" or" Free"? Black Labor in Cotton and Sugarcane Farming, 1865-1880,” The Journal of Southern History, 1984, pp. 569–596.

Sorenson, Clyde, “The boll weevil in Missouri: history, biology and management,” University Extension, University of Missouri - Columbia, 1995.

Stock, James H. and Motohiro Yogo, “Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression,” Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg, 2005.

Street, James H., “Cotton Mechanization and Economic Development,” The American Economic Review, 1955, 45 (4), 566–583.

Sundstrom, William A., “Discouraging Times: The Labor Force Participation of Married Black Women, 1930–1940,” Explorations in Economic History, 2001, 38 (1), 123–146.

US Bureau of the Census, Abstract of the Twelfth Census of the United States 1900, Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office, 1904.

______, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Bicentennial edition, Part 1, Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1975.

USDA, “Statistics on Cotton and Related Data,” Statistical Bulletin No. 99, 1951.

Whatley, Warren C., “Southern agrarian labor contracts as impediments to cotton mechanization,” The Journal of Economic History, 1987, 47 (01), 45–70.

Wright, Gavin, Old South, new South: Revolutions in the southern economy since the Civil War, Vol. 2, Basic Books New York, 1986.