Industrial Agglomeration and Spatial Persistence: Entry, Growth, and Exit of Software Publishers

Deltas, George and De Silva, Dakshina G. and McComb, Robert P. (2014): Industrial Agglomeration and Spatial Persistence: Entry, Growth, and Exit of Software Publishers.

Abstract

We use geocoded administrative data from Texas on all business establishments to estimate the effects of localization economies on the spatial persistence of industrial employment for the software industry. We decompose this persistence into components arising from entry rates, firm growth, and exit rates. Unlike previous research that has used geographies based on county and MSA divisions, this analysis takes place at a very high level of spatial resolution in which the industrial composition is identified within areas as small as one mile in radius. The choice of the software industry allows us to isolate the effects arising from human capital spillovers and the effects arising from the labor pool channel from other sources of agglomeration economies. Moreover, the decomposition of the employment persistence in entry, growth and exit, and the high level of spatial resolution allow us to distinguish between these two effects and has a number of other advantages. The results suggest that a location, defined as a 1-mile radium circle, with an initial concentration of software industry employment, retains a disproportionate number of software industry employees 6 years later. Software industry employment in the surrounding area has a small and often insignificant effect, i.e., any agglomeration effects dissipate rapidly over space. The results are not driven by higher growth rates of software establishments in high concentration locations or by differences in the survival probabilities. Rather, they are fully accounted for by two factors: (i) the retention of jobs lost by an establishment in a location by other establishments in that same location and (ii) an increased propensity of software establishments to enter in or near locations with prior software establishment presence. The entry effect diminishes sharply beyond one mile. These findings are mostly consistent with labor channel effects, including the possibility of spin-offs locating near existing firms, but disembodied human capital spillovers might also be present to some extent.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Agglomeration economies, labor pools, knowledge spillovers, firm growth
• Subjects: R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity

References

Abramovsky, L., R. Harrison, and H. Simpson (2007). “University Research and the Location of Business R & D,” Economic Journal, 117: C114-C141.

Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch, and M. P. Feldman (1994). “R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 100: 336-367.

Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman (1996). “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production,” American Economic Review, 86: 630-640.

Buenstorf, G. and S. Klepper (2009). “Heritage and Agglomeration: The Akron Tyre Cluster Revisited,” Economic Journal, 119: 705-733.

Ciccone, A. and R. E. Hall (1996). “Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity,” American Economic Review, 86: 54-70.

Combes, P. (2000). “Economic Structure and Local Growth: France, 1984-1993,” Journal of Urban Economics, 47: 329-355.

De Silva, D. G. and R.P. McComb (2012). “Research Universities and Regional High-Tech Firm Start-ups and Exit,” Economic Inquiry, 50: 112-130.

Dunne, P. and A. Hughes (1994). “Age, Size, Growth and Survival: UK Companies in the 1980s,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 42: 115-140.

Dunne, T., S. D. Klimek, and M. J. Roberts (2005). “Exit from Regional Manufacturing Markets: The Role of Entrant Experience,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23: 399-421.

Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts, and L. Samuelson (1988). “Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in the U.S. Manufacturing Industries,” Rand Journal of Economics, 19: 495-515.

Evans, D. S. (1987). “Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 95: 657-674.

Freedman, M. L. (2008). “Job Hopping, Earnings Dynamics, and industrial agglomeration in the Software Publishing Industry,” Journal of Urban Economics, 64: 590-600.

Glaeser, E. L., H. L. Kallal, J. A. Scheinkman, A. Schleifer (1992). “Growth in Cities,” Journal of Political Economy, 100: 1126-1152.

Hart, P. E. and N. Oulton (1996). “Growth and Size of Firms,” Economic Journal, 106: 1242-1252.

Henderson, J. V. (1994). “Where Does an Industry Locate?,” Journal of Urban Economics, 35: 83-104.

Henderson, V., A. Kuncoro, and M. Turner (1995). “Industrial Development in Cities,” Journal of Political Economy, 103: 1067-1090.

Holmes, T. J. and J. J. Stevens (2002). “Geographic Concentration and Establishment Scale,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 84: 682-690.

Krugman, P. (1991). “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography,” Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483-499.

Rosenthal, S. S. and W. C. Strange (2003). “Geography, Industrial Organization, and Agglomeration,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 85: 377-393.

Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Staber, U. (2001). “Spatial Proximity and Firm Survival in a Declining Industrial District: The Case of Knitwear Firms in Baden-Wurttemberg,” Regional Studies, 35: 329-341.

Wallsten, S. J. (2001). “An Empirical Test of Geographic Knowledge Spillovers using Geographic Information Systems and Firm-size-level Data,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31: 571-599.

Woodward, D., O. Figuerido, and P. Guimaraes (2006). “Beyond the SiliconValley: Univeristy R&D and high technology location,” Journal of Urban Economics, 60: 15-32.