Opening Access to Research

Armstrong, Mark (2014): Opening Access to Research.

Abstract

Traditionally, the scholarly journal market operates so that research institutions are charged high prices and the wider public is often excluded altogether, while authors can usually publish for free and commercial publishers enjoy high profits. Two forms of open access regulation can mitigate these problems: (i) authors are required to publish in a journal which allows readers free and immediate access to their article, or (ii) authors are required to make freely available an inferior substitute to the published paper (and to publish in a journal which permits this). The former policy is likely to result in authors paying to publish, which may lead to a reduction in the quantity of published papers and may make authors less willing to publish in selective journals. The latter policy makes freely available only an inferior version of the published article, but may be consistent with authors publishing for free.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: publishing, journals, open access, two-sided markets, regulation
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L82 - Entertainment ; Media

References

Acharya, Anurag, et al. (2014), "Rise of the rest: the growing impact of non-elite journals", mimeo.

Armstrong, Mark (2002), "The theory of access pricing and interconnection", in Handbook of Telecommunications Economics Vol. 1 (eds. Cave, Majumdar and Vogelsang), pp. 295--384. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Armstrong, Mark (2006), "Competition in two-sided markets", RAND Journal of Economics 37: 668--691.

Association of Research Libraries (2006), ARL Statistics 2004-05, Washington DC.

Barton, Henry (1963), "The publication charge plan in physics journals", Physics Today 16: 45--57.

Beall, Jeffrey (2012), "Predatory publishers are corrupting open access", Nature 489: 179.

Berg, Sanford (1971), "Increasing the efficiency of the economics journal market", Journal of Economic Literature 9: 798--813.

Bergstrom, Theodore (2001), "Free labor for costly journals?", Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 183--198.

Bergstrom, Theodore, Paul Courant, Preston McAfee and Michael Williams (2014), "Evaluating big deal journal bundles", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 9425--9430.

Bergstrom, Theodore and Rosemarie Lavaty (2007), "How often do economists self-archive?", mimeo.

Bikhchandani, Sushil, David Hirshleifer and Ivo Welch (1992), "A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades", Journal of Political Economy 100: 992--1026.

Bohannon, John (2013), "Who's afraid of peer review?", Science 342: 60-65.

Brand, Amy (2012), "Beyond mandate and repository, toward sustainable faculty self-archiving", Learned Publishing 25: 29--34.

Brown, Patrick, Michael Eisen and Harold Varmus (2003), "Why PLoS became a publisher", PLoS Biology 1: 1--2.

Davis, Philip (2011), "Open access, readership, citations: a randomised controlled trial of scientific journal publishing", The FASEB Journal 25, 2129--2134.

Dewatripont, Mathias, et al. (2006), Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets in Europe, Brussels: European Commission.

Ellison, Glenn (2002a), "The slowdown of the economics publishing process", Journal of Political Economy 110: 947--993.

Ellison, Glenn (2002b), "Evolving standards for academic publishing: a q-r theory", Journal of Political Economy 110: 994--1034.

Finch, Janet, et al. (2012), Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications, Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings.

Gomes, Renato and Alessandro Pavan (2014), "Many-to-many matching and price discrimination", mimeo.

Harnad, Stevan (1995), "Universal FTP archives for esoteric science and scholarship: a subversive proposal", in Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing (Okerson and O'Donnell, eds.), Washington DC, Association of Research Libraries.

Houghton, John, Alma Swan and Sheridan Brown (2011), Access to Research and Technical Information in Denmark, Report to the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation.

House of Commons (2004), Scientific Publications: Free for all? A report of the Science and Technology Committee, London: The Stationary Office.

House of Commons (2013), Open Access: A Report of the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, London: The Stationary Office.

Jeon, Doh-Shin and Jean-Charles Rochet, (2010), "The pricing of academic journals: a two-sided market perspective", American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 2: 222--255.

McAfee, Preston (2010), "Edifying editing", The American Economist 55: 1--8.

McCabe, Mark and Christopher Snyder (2005), "Open access and academic journal quality", American Economic Review 95: 453--458.

McCabe, Mark and Christopher Snyder (2014), "The economics of open-access journals", mimeo.

McCabe, Mark, Christopher Snyder and Anna Fagin (2013), "Open access versus traditional journal pricing: using a simple `platform market' model to understand which will win (and which should)", Journal of Academic Librarianship 39: 11--19.

Peitz, Martin and Patrick Waelbroech (2006), "Piracy of digital products: a critical review of the theoretical literature", Information Economics and Policy 18: 449--476.

Rysman, Marc (2009), "The economics of two-sided markets", Journal of Economic Perspectives 23: 125--143.

Shavell, Steven (2010), "Should copyright of academic works be abolished?", Journal of Legal Analysis 2: 301--358.

Shao, Jufang and Huiyun Shen (2011), "The outflow of academic papers from China: why is it happening and can it be stemmed?", Learned Publishing 24: 95--97.

Solomon, David and Bo-Christer Björk (2012), "Publication fees in open access publishing: sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63: 98--107.

Strieb, Karla and Julia Blixrud (2013), "The state of large-publisher bundles in 2012", Research Library Issues 282: 13--20.

Suber, Peter (2012), Open Access, MIT Press.

Welch, Ivo (2014), "Referee recommendations", Review of Financial Studies 27: 2773--2804.

Willinsky, John (2006), The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship, MIT Press.