Finding the Poor vs. Measuring Their Poverty: Exploring the Drivers of Targeting Effectiveness in Indonesia.

Bah, Adama and Bazzi, Samuel and Sumarto, Sudarno and Tobias, Julia (2014): Finding the Poor vs. Measuring Their Poverty: Exploring the Drivers of Targeting Effectiveness in Indonesia. Published in:

Abstract

Centralised targeting registries are increasingly used to allocate social assistance benefits in developing countries. This paper provides the first attempt to identify the relative importance of two key design issues for targeting accuracy: (1) which households to survey for inclusion in the targeting registry and (2) how to rank surveyed households. We evaluate the performance of Indonesia’s Unified Database for Social Protection Programmes (UDB), the largest targeting registry in the world, which is used to provide social assistance to more than 25 million households. Linking administrative data with an independent household survey, we find that the UDB system is more progressive than previous targeting approaches used in Indonesia, leading to a decrease in benefit leakage to non-poor households. However, if poor households are not surveyed in the first place, even a perfect ranking method cannot prevent their exclusion. Under a simulation that considers enumerating and estimating proxy-means testing (PMT) scores for all households (as in a census), we estimate a one-third decrease in undercoverage compared to focusing on households that have been registered in the UDB. Investigating household- and community-level correlates of misenumeration and misclassification, we find evidence that local communities use different definitions of poverty and have better information on the welfare status of their members.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Targeting, Proxy-Means Testing, Social Protection, Poverty
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

References

Acosta, P., P. Leite, and J. Rigolini. 2011. ‘Should Cash Transfers Be Confined to the Poor? Implications for Poverty and Inequality in Latin America’. Policy Paper No. 34. Bonn, Germany: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA or Institute for the Study of Labor).

Alatas, V., A. Banerjee, R. Hanna, B. A. Olken, and J. Tobias. 2012. ‘Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia’. The American Economic Review 102(4): 1206–40.

Alatas, V., A. Banerjee, R. Hanna, B. A. Olken, R. Purnamasari, and M. Wai-Poi. 2013a. ‘Does Elite Capture Matter? Local Elites and Targeted Welfare Programmes in Indonesia’. NBER Working Paper 18798. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Alatas, V., A. Banerjee, R. Hanna, B. A. Olken, R. Purnamasari, and M. Wai-Poi. 2013b. ‘Ordeal Mechanisms in Targeting: Theory and Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia’. NBER Working Paper 19127. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bah, A. 2013. ‘Finding the Best Indicators to Identify the Poor’. Working Paper 01-2013, Jakarta, Indonesia: The National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction (TNP2K).

Banerjee, A., E. Duflo, R. Chattopadhyay, and J. Shapiro. 2007. ‘Targeting Efficiency: How Well Can We Identify the Poor?’ Working Paper Series No. 21. Chennai, India: Institute for Financial Management and Research Centre for Micro Finance.

Bazzi, S., S. Sumarto, and A. Suryahadi. 2014. ‘It’s All in the Timing: Cash Transfers and Consumption Smoothing in a Developing Country’. Unpublished manuscript.

Camacho, A., and E. Conover. 2011. ‘Manipulation of Social Program Eligibility’. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(2): 41–65.

Castañeda, T., K. Lindert, B. de la Brière, L. Fernandez, C. Hubert, O. Larrañaga, M. Orozco, and R. Viquez. 2005. ‘Designing and Implementing Household Targeting Systems: Lessons from Latin America and the United States‘. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 0526. The World Bank: Washington, DC.

Coady, D., M. Grosh, and J. Hoddinott. 2004. ‘Targeting Outcomes Redux’. The World Bank Research Observer 19(1): 61–85.

Coady, D., and E. Skoufias. 2004. ‘On the Targeting and Redistributive Efficiencies of Alternative Transfer Instruments’. Review of Income and Wealth 50(1): 11–27.

Cornia, G. A., and F. Stewart. 1995. ‘Two Errors of Targeting’. In D. van de Walle and K. Nead (Eds.), Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

Dreze, J., and A. Sen. 1989. Hunger and Public Action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Dreze, J., and R. Khera. 2010. ‘The BPL Census and a Possible Alternative’. Economic & Political Weekly 45(9): 54–63.

Elbers, C., J. O. Lanjouw, and P. Lanjouw. 2003. ‘Micro-Level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality’. Econometrica 71(1): 355–64.

Grosh, M., and J. Baker. 1995. ‘Proxy-Means Tests for Targeting Social Programmes: Simulations and Speculation’. Working Paper No. 118. Living Standards Measurement Study, Washington DC: World Bank.

International Labour Organization. 2010. Extending Social Security to All: A Guide through Challenges and Options. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

Karlan, D., and B. Thuysbaert. 2013. ‘Targeting Ultra-Poor Households in Honduras and Peru’. Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 1033 and Yale Economics Department Working Paper No. 125. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2351553.

Kurasawa, A. 2009. ‘Swaying between State and Community: The Role of RT/RW in Post-Suharto Indonesia’. In B. L. Read and R. Pekkanen (Eds.), Local Organizations and Urban Governance in East and Southeast Asia: Straddling State and Society (pp. 58–83). London and New York: Routledge.

Muller, C., and S. Bibi. 2010. ‘Refining Targeting against Poverty Evidence from Tunisia’. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 72(3): 381–410.

Niehaus, P., and A. Atanassova. 2013. ‘Targeting with Agents’. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(1): 206–38.

Skoufias, E., B. Davis, and S. De La Vega. 2001. ‘Targeting the Poor in Mexico: An Evaluation of the Selection of Households into PROGRESA’. World Development 29(10): 1769–84.

SMERU. 2006. Rapid Appraisal of the Implementation of the 2005 Direct Cash Transfer Program in Indonesia: A Case Study in Five Kabupaten/Kota. Jakarta, Indonesia: SMERU Research Institute.

SMERU. 2012. Rapid Appraisal of the 2011 Data Collection of Social Protection Programmes (PPLS 2011). Jakarta, Indonesia: SMERU Research Institute and Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (TNP2K).

Sumarto, S., D. Suryadarma, and A. Suryahadi. 2007. ‘Predicting Consumption Poverty using Non-Consumption Indicators: Experiments Using Indonesian Data’. Social Indicators Research 81(3): 543–78.

TNP2K. 2014. Pembangunan Basis Data Terpadu Untuk Mendukung Program Perlindungan Sosial. Jakarta, Indonesia: Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (TNP2K).

World Bank. 2012. Targeting Poor and Vulnerable Households in Indonesia. Public Expenditure Review (PER). Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/01/15879773/targeting-poor-vulnerable-households-indonesia.