Cebula, Richard (2010): The Pursuit of an Effective Balanced Budget Amendment. Published in: Tax Notes , Vol. 132, No. 10 (5 September 2011): pp. 1046-1050.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_60030.pdf Download (318kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article provides an alternative to the standard simplistic form of a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Instead of simply prohibiting government outlays from exceeding government revenues, which could lead to higher government spending and to higher taxation levels, this proposal provides potential flexibility in the federal budget and deficit conditions (when necessary) while protecting against tax increases and excessive growth in government outlays. The proposal prohibits government spending from exceeding revenues; however, under some conditions, with the approval of a two-thirds majority of both the House and Senate along with approval of the president, a temporary budget deficit of up to 2.5 percent of GDP could be authorized. The requirements that must be met for such a limited budget deficit include the following: the ratio of government spending to GDP may not exceed 20 Percent (its approximate average historical level), and the unemployment rate must exceed 8 percent (to reflect genuine recessionary conditions). The conditions could be modified; for example, a 7.5 percent unemployment rate could be adopted.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Pursuit of an Effective Balanced Budget Amendment |
English Title: | The Pursuit of an Effective Balanced Budget Amendment |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | balanced budget; tax limits; expenditure limits; exceptions |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H62 - Deficit ; Surplus H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H68 - Forecasts of Budgets, Deficits, and Debt |
Item ID: | 60030 |
Depositing User: | Richard Cebula |
Date Deposited: | 19 Nov 2014 05:39 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 23:38 |
References: | Carlson, Keith M. and Spencer, Roger W., “Crowding Out and Its Critics”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, (1975), 60, pp. 1-19. Cebula, Richard J., “How Reducing Fiscal Freedom Affects Economic Growth”, Tax Notes, (2010), 130, pp. 323-329. Cebula, Richard J., “Recent Empirical Evidence on the Impact of the Primary Budget Deficit on Nominal Longer Term Treasury Note Interest Yields”, Global Business and Economic Review, (2005), 47, pp. 7-20. Cebula, Richard J., The Deficit Problem in Perspective, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, (1987). Cebula, Richard J. and Coombs, Christopher K., “What Happens When You Increase Taxes on the Rich?” Tax Notes, (2011), 132, pp. 299-305. Clark, J.R. and Lawson, Robert A., “The Impact of Economic Growth, Tax Policy, and Economic Freedom on Income Inequality”, Journal of Private Enterprise,(2008), 23, pp. 24-26. Farmer, Karl, “Public-Debt Sustainability, Real Exchange Rates, and Country-Specific Savings Rates”, International Advances in Economic Research, (2011), 45, pp. 17-23. Guseh, James, “Government Size and Growth in Developing Countries: A Political-Economy Framework”, Journal of Macroeconomics,(1997), 19, pp. 175-191. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/60030 |