On the Existence of Optimal Level of Women’s Intelligence in Men’s Perception: Evidence from a Speed Dating Experiment

Deja, Dominik and Karbowski, Adam and Zawisza, Mateusz (2014): On the Existence of Optimal Level of Women’s Intelligence in Men’s Perception: Evidence from a Speed Dating Experiment.

Abstract

We study gender differences in preferences for mate characteristics such as perceived physical attractiveness and intelligence using data from a speed dating experiment. We have observed that women give greater weight to perceived physical attractiveness than intelligence in their mating decisions. Probability of women’s positive speed dating decision rises with men’s perceived physical attractiveness (in this case we observe increasing marginal effects) and intelligence (with diminishing marginal effects). Marginal rate of substitution of men’s perceived physical attractiveness for intelligence is the highest for low levels of men’s perceived intelligence and the lowest for high values of men’s perceived intelligence. Men also give greater weight to perceived physical attractiveness than intelligence in their mating choices. Probability of men’s positive decision rises with women’s perceived physical attractiveness (in this case we observe diminishing marginal effects). The relationship between probability of men’s positive decision and women’s perceived intelligence is non-monotonic. The optimal level of women’s intelligence in men’s perception exists. This optimal value rises with women’s perceived physical attractiveness.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gender differences; Mate preferences; Speed dating experiment
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics

References

Asendorpf, J., Penke, L. and Back, M. (2011). From Dating to Mating and Relating: Predictors of Initial and Long-Term Outcomes of Speed-Dating in a Community Sample. European Journal of Personality, 25: 16-30.

Belot, M. and Francesconi, M. (2006). Can Anyone Be “The” One? Evidence on Mate Selection from Speed Dating. Discussion Paper No. 2377, The Institute for the Study of Labor in Bonn.

Buss, D. and Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 559-570.

Buss, D. (1989a). Toward an Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12: 39-49.

Buss, D. (1989b). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypothesis tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12: 1-49.

Buss, D., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A. [and 45 additional authors] (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 21: 5-47.

Buss, D. and Schmitt, D. (1993). Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychological Review, 100: 204-232.

Buss, D. and Kenrick, D. (1998). Evolutionary Social Psychology. In Gilbert, D. (ed.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Eagly, A. and Wood, W. (1999). The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions versus Social Roles. American Psychologist, LIV: 408-423.

Finkel, E., Eastwick, P. and Matthews, J. (2007). Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: A methodological primer. Personal Relationships, 14: 149-166.

Fisman, R., Iyengar, S., Kamenica, E. and Simonson, I. (2006). Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence from a Speed Dating Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121: 673-697.

Fisman, R., Iyengar, S., Kamenica, E. and Simonson, I. (2008). Racial Preferences in Dating. Review of Economic Studies, 75: 117-132.

Gale, D. and Shapley, L. (1962). College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage. American Mathematical Monthly, 69: 9-15.

Geary, D., Vigil, J. and Byrd-Craven, J. (2004). Evolution of Human Mate Choice. The Journal of Sex Research, 41: 27-42.

Gelman, A. and Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer: New York.

Hoyt, L. and Hudson, J. (1981). Personal characteristics important in mate preference among college students. Social Behavior and Personality, 9: 93-96.

Kenrick, D. and Keefe, R. (1992). Age Preferences in Mates Reflect Sex Differences in Human Reproductive Strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15: 75-91.

Kenrick, D., Groth, G., Trost, M. and Sadalla, E. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64: 951-969.

Kerckhoff, A. and Davis, K. (1962). Value Consensus and Need Complementarity in Mate Selection. American Sociological Review, XXVII: 295-303.

Landolt, M., Lalumiere, M. and Quinsey, V. (1995). Sex Differences in Intra-Sex Variations in Human Mating Tactics: An Evolutionary Approach. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16: 3-23.

Miller, G. (1997). Mate choice: From sexual cues to cognitive adaptations. In Cardew, G. (ed.), Characterizing human psychological adaptations. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester.

Montoya, R.M. (2008). I’m hot, so I’d say you’re not: the influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34: 1315-1331.

Penke, L. and Denissen, J. (2008). Sex differences and lifestyle-dependent shifts in the attunement of self-esteem to self-perceived mate value: Hints to an adaptive mechanism?. Journal of Research in Personality, 42: 1123-1129.

Prokosch, M., Coss, R., Scheib, J. and Blozis, S. (2009). Intelligence and mate choice: intelligent men are always appealing. Evolution & Human Behavior, 30: 11-20.

Regan, P. (1998). Minimum Mate Selection Standards as a Function of Perceived Mate Value, Relationship Context, and Gender. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 10: 53–73.

Regan, P., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, F. and Cate, R. (2000). Partner Preferences: What Characteristics Do Men and Women Desire in Their Short-Term Sexual and Long-Term Romantic Partners?. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12: 1-21.

Roth, A. and Sotomayor, M. (1990). Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Sandhya, S. (2013). Socio-Economic Status and Physical Attractiveness in Mate Selection Choice. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3: 1-4.

Sepehri, S. and Bagherian, F. (2013). Generation and Gender Differences in Mate Selection. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84: 10-12.

Shapley, L. and Shubik, M. (1972). The Assignment Game I: The Core. International Journal of Game Theory, 1: 111-130.

Trivers, R. (1972). Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971, Aldine: Chicago.