Che, Yeon-Koo and Spier, Kathryn (2007): Exploiting Plaintiffs Through Settlement: Divide and Conquer. Published in: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_6104.pdf Download (265kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper considers settlement negotiations between a single defendant and $N$ plaintiffs when there are fixed costs of litigation. When making simultaneous take-it-or-leave-it offers to the plaintiffs, the defendant adopts a divide and conquer strategy. Plaintiffs settle their claims for less than they are jointly worth. The problem is worse when $N$ is larger, the offers are sequential, and the plaintiffs make offers instead. Although divide and conquer strategies dilute the defendant's incentives, they increase the settlement rate and reduce litigation spending. Plaintiffs can raise their joint payoff through transfer payments, voting rules, and covenants not to accept discriminatory offers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Exploiting Plaintiffs Through Settlement: Divide and Conquer |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K0 - General D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty |
Item ID: | 6104 |
Depositing User: | Yeon-Koo Che |
Date Deposited: | 04 Dec 2007 19:39 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 03:22 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/6104 |