Economics of Sex in Advertising: Are Men More Receptive to the Provocation?

Osuagwu, Eze (2014): Economics of Sex in Advertising: Are Men More Receptive to the Provocation? Published in: Australian International Journal of Humanities and Social Studies , Vol. 1, No. 1 (July 2014): pp. 31-39.

Abstract

In this paper, the central objective is to analyze the visual rhetoric of selected fashion ads in Vogue, Cosmopolitan, Maxim and GQ (Gentlemen Quarterly), to show how sexually explicit images of the female body is used to sell products to consumers, and to determine whether this is in response to the fact that the male is prone to gratuitous sex than the female. In this instance, I analyze the images from ads in female fashion magazines Vogue and Cosmopolitan in comparison to ads in male magazines Maxim and GQ, using tropes of sexuality and femininity. I provide basic insights to the nature of advertisements in contemporary fashion magazines, drawing on two theoretical frameworks rooted in the evolutionary and socialization models of human sexuality; the social exchange theory and the sexual economic theory espoused by Baumeister et al. (2001). The inference deduced from the theoretical constructs in the literature show that men are more economically empowered to taking decisions in the sex bargain and have a higher propensity to consume sexually explicit images of women in advertisements.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Sex, Advertising, Visual Rhetoric
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A3 - Collective Works; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology

References

Baumeister, Roy F., Kathleen R. Catanese, and Kathleen D. Vohs, “Is There a Gender Difference in Strength of Sex Drive? Theoretical Views, Conceptual Distinctions, and a Review of Relevant Evidence,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 (3), 242–73, 2001.

Courtney, A., & Lockeretz, S. W., “A woman’s place: An analysis of roles portrayed by women in magazine advertisements.” Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 92-95, 1971.

Dahl, Darren W., Jaideep Sengupta and Kathleen D. Vohs, “Sex in Advertising: Gender Differences and the Role of Relationship Commitment,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 215-231, 2009.

Ford, Jennifer, 2008. "Fashion Advertising, Men's Magazines, and Sex in Advertising: A Critical-Interpretive Study". University of South Florida, Graduate School Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/246, downloaded 1/26/2013.

Goffman, Erving, Gender Advertisements, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.

Scott, Linda M. “Images in Advertising: The Need for a Theory of Visual Rhetoric,” The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21. No. 2, Pp. 252-273, 1994.

Sengupta, Jaideep and Darren W. Dahl, “Gender-Related Reactions to Gratuitous Sex Appeals in Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18 (1), 62–78, 2008.

Shields, V. R., & Heinecken, D., Measuring up: How Advertising Affects Self-image. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002.