The Impact of Rural Electrification

Torero, Maximo (2014): The Impact of Rural Electrification.

Abstract

Rigorous impact evaluation that includes appropriately selected control groups must be a part of rural electrification program designs. Budgeting evaluation activities and engaging with evaluators at an early stage improves to likelihood of having a high quality evaluation design; plus, if deviations occur after the design stage, the evaluators are better prepared to adjust the design so that the impact results remain informative to policy makers and future program designers. Another takeaway is to use unified framework to specify the expected outcomes and the plausible sizes of impacts. If done at the beginning of the program, this will provide context to the kind of discussion that policy makers should engage in (e.g. if they should focus on health benefits or the potential to diffuse information campaigns to rural households). These points focus mostly on internal validity, but we also need to focus on external validity as well. Large scale rural electrification programs will provide an opportunity to test if the results from small scale impact evaluations translate to other settings. Something we have not stressed so far but that is important to keep in mind are the complementarities in the provision of different type of infrastructure. Large projects can provide an opportunity to explore complementarities with other infrastructure programs, such as mobile telephony, road access, and improved water and sanitation access. They can shed light on what are the most welfare-enhancing policy options when deciding what types of infrastructure to provide in rural areas, and especially to poor rural households. Finally, we reiterate the need to use an objective function that casts a wider net when deciding where to place electrification programs. Focusing solely on cost minimization can result in missed opportunities. When deciding where to deploy the electric grid in rural areas it is imperative to take into account the potential profits, specifically the agricultural potential of these areas. By using the isoprofit and cost minimization framework described, rural electrification programs have the opportunity to reach more poor households and have larger impacts in the lives of the rural poor by providing new opportunities and enhancing the synergies between the agricultural and non-agricultural sector.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Impac evaluation Rural electrification Rural poor
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Barron, M and Torero, M 2014, 'Household Electrification: Short-Term Effects with Long-Term Implications', mimeo, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley.

Bekker, B, Eberhard, A, Gaunt, T and Marquard, A 2007, 'South Africa’s Electrification Programme, an overview and assessment', Graduate School of Business, Working Paper, University of Cape Town.

Bernard, T 2012, 'Impact Analysis of Rural Electrification Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa', World Bank Research Observer , vol 27, no. 1, pp. 33-51.

Bernard, T and Torero, M 2009, 'Social Interaction Effects and Connection to Electricity: Experimental Evidence from Rural Ethiopia', mimeo, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

Bernard, T and Torero, M 2011, 'Randomizing the "Last Mile": A methodological note on using a voucher-based approach to assess the impact of infrastructure projects', IFPRI discussion papers 1078, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

Bhattacharyya, SC 2006, 'Energy access problem of the poor in India: Is rural electrification a remedy?', Energy Policy, vol 34, no. 18, pp. 3387-3397.

Chaurey, A, Ranganathan, M and Mohanty, P 2004, 'Electricity access for geographically disadvantaged rural communities--technology and policy insights', Energy Policy, vol 32, no. 15, pp. 1693-1705.

Davis, M 1998, 'Rural household energy consumption : The effects of access to electricity--evidence from South Africa', Energy Policy, vol 26, no. 3, pp. 207-217.

Dinkelman, T 2011, 'The Effects of Rural Electrification on Employment: New Evidence from South Africa', American Economic Review, vol 101, no. 7, pp. 3078-3108.

Escobal, J and Torero, M 2005, 'Measuring the Impact of Asset Complementarities: The Case of Rural Peru', Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, vol 42, no. 125, pp. 137-164.

Galiani, S, Gertler, P and Schargrodsky, E 2005, 'Water for Life: The Impact of the Privatization of Water Services on Child Mortality', Journal of Political Economy, vol 113, no. 1, pp. 83-120.

Heckman, J, Ichimura, H and Todd, P 1998, 'Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator', Review of Economic Studies, pp. 261-294.

IEG 2008, 'The Welfare Impact of Rural Electrification: A Reassesment of the Costs and Benefits', The Independent Evaluation Group, The World Bank Group, Washington, D.C.

Kanagawa, M and Nakata, T 2008, 'Assessment of access to electricity and the socio-economic impacts in rural areas of developing countries', Energy Policy, vol 36, no. 6, pp. 2016-2029.

Khandker, SR, Barnes, DF and Samad, HA 2009, 'Welfare impacts of rural electrification : a case study from Bangladesh', Policy Research Working Paper Series 4859, The World Bank.

Khandker, SR, Barnes, DF, Samad, H and Minh, NH 2009, 'Welfare Impacts of Rural Electrification: Evidence from Vietnam', Policy Research Working Paper Series 5057, The World Bank.

Madubansi, M and Shackleton, CM 2006, 'Changing energy profiles and consumption patterns following electrification in five rural villages, South Africa', Energy Policy, vol 34, no. 18, pp. 4081-4092.

Ramírez, MT and Esfahani, HS 1999, 'Infrastructure and Economic Growth', Borradores de Economia, Banco de la República, Bogotá, Colombia.

Rosenbaum, PR and Rubin, DB 1983, 'The Central Role of Propensity Score in Observational Studies', Biometrika, pp. 41-55.

Spalding-Fecher, R and Matibe, DK 2003, 'Electricity and externalities in South Africa', Energy Policy, vol 31, no. 8, pp. 721-734.

van de Walle, D 2003, 'Are Returns to Investment Lower for the Poor? Human and Physical Capital Interactions in Rural Vietnam', Review of Development Economics, vol 7, no. 4, pp. 636-653.

van de Walle, D, Ravallion, M, Mendiratta, V and Koolwal, G 2013, 'Long-Term Impacts of Household Electrification in Rural India', Policy Research Working Paper Series 6527, The World Bank.