Havas, Attila (2002): Does innovation policy matter? The case of Hungary. Published in: Journal of International Relations and Development , Vol. 5, No. 4 (2002): pp. 380-402.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61180.pdf Download (240kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The political and economic transition posed a complex, tremendous challenge in Hungary in the beginning of the 1990s. Not only macroeconomic stabilisation was required, but fundamental organisational and institutional changes were also needed to transform the country into a stable, middle-income economy, capable of catching up with the more advanced ones in the longer run. Having completed the first round of transition, Hungary has again reached a cross-roads. While the one-party system has been replaced with a multi-party parliamentary democracy and the planned economy with a market economy based on private ownership, the world has significantly changed during this historically short period of time. Hungary now has to consider what role to play in the globalising learning economy, i.e. what future it envisions for herself. To be more specific: does the country passively accept the fate of a mere surviving economy, drifting without having its own strategy? Or, by implementing a clear strategy, does Hungary intend to be prosperous country, where in 15-20 years most citizens will enjoy high living standards, good health and a clean environment? The paper argues that a sound, coherent innovation policy is one of the cornerstones of an overall development strategy, required if a country is to excel. Yet, in spite of a number of efforts/ trials in the 1990s, no such policy document was approved in Hungary. The article first provides a brief overview of the transition process, emphasising the simultaneous need for systemic changes and macroeconomic stabilisation in order to improve economic performance. Its core section analyses recent changes in the S&T decision-making system, various efforts to draft S&T and innovation policy documents, as well as the inputs and outputs of R&D and innovation. It concludes that the lack of an explicit innovation policy may hinder long-term development as such a policy is required to signal the main policy directions and commitments of the government, to strengthen the national innovation system – thus anchor FDI – and to align all public and private efforts/ resources for development.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does innovation policy matter? The case of Hungary |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Transition to market economy; Innovation policy; Hungary |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies |
Item ID: | 61659 |
Depositing User: | Attila Havas |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2015 20:17 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 17:01 |
References: | Antal, László (1998a): Az átmenet évtizede: kormányok, programok, gazdasági folyamatok (The Decade of Transition: Governments, programmes, economic developments), in: Sándor Kurtán, Péter Sándor and László Vass (eds.) Magyarország évtizedkönyve: A rendszerváltás (1988-1998) (The Decade of Systemic Changes in Hungary, 1988-1998), 57-81, Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapítvány Antal, László (1998b): Az átmenet és ami utána következik: a magyar gazdaság mérlege (Transiton and its Aftermath: Assessment of the Hungarian Economy), Mozgó Világ 24(1), 3-23 Balázs, Katalin (1994): Transition crisis in Hungary’s R&D sector, Economic Systems 18(3), 281-306 CSO (various years): Research and Development, Budapest: KSH Cuhls, Kerstin, Knut Blind and Hariolf Grupp (2002): Innovations for our Future, Delphi ’98: New foresight on science and technology, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag Dodgson, Mark and John Bessant (1996): Effective Innovation Policy: A new approach, London: International Thomson Dosi, Giovanni (1988): Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation, Journal of Economic Literature 26(3), 1120-71 Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman, Richard R. Nelson, Gerald Silverberg and Luc Soete, (eds.) (1988): Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter EC (1996): Green Paper on Innovation, Brussels - Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC Edquist, Charles (ed.) (1997): Systems of Innovations: Technologies, institutions and organisations, London: Pinter Ergas, Henry (1987): The importance of technology policy, in: Partha Dasgupta and Paul Stoneman (eds.): Economic Policy and Technological Performance, 51-96, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Farkas, Zoltán (1998): “Nincsenek varázsszerek” – Surányi Györggyel beszélget Farkas Zoltán (“No Magic Cure” – interview with György Surányi by Zoltán Farkas), Mozgó Világ 24(1), 25-42 Foray, Dominique and Christopher Freeman (eds.) (1992): Technology and the Wealth of Nations, London: Pinter Freeman, Christopher (1994): The economics of technical change: A critical survey, Cambridge Journal of Economics 18(5), 463-514 Freeman, Christopher (1995): The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1), 5-24 Freeman, Christopher and Luc Soete (1997): The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd edition, London: Pinter Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow (1994): The new production of knowledge, London: Sage Publications Grupp, Hariolf (1998): Foundations of the Economics of Innovation: Theory, measurement and practice, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing GM (2000): Széchenyi Terv: A jövő pillérei (Széchenyi Plan: Pillars of the Future), Budapest: GM Halpern, László and Charles Wyplosz (1998): The Hidden Hungarian Miracle, in: László Halpern and Charles Wyplosz (eds.): Towards a Market Economy, 1-19, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Havas, Attila (1999): A Long Way to Go: The Hungarian science and technology policy in transition, in: Mihály Laki, Anne Lorentzen and Brigitte Wiedmaier (eds.): Institutional change and industrial development in Central and Eastern Europe, 221-48, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Havas, Attila (2000a): Foresight in a Small Country in Transition: Preliminary lessons of the Hungarian Technology Programme, in: Michael Haeder and Sabine Haeder (eds.): Die Delphi-Technik in den Sozial-wissenschaften, 95-107, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag Havas, Attila (2000b): Local, regional and global production networks: re-integration of the Hungarian automotive industry, in: Christian von Hirschhausen and Jürgen Bitzer (eds.): The Globalization of Industry and Innovation in Eastern Europe - From Post-socialist Restructuring to International Competitiveness, 95-127, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Havas, Attila (2001): National Innovation Policy Profile: Hungary, country study for Claire Nauwelaers, Slavo Radosevic and Alasdair Reid (eds.): Innovation Policy in Six Applicant Countries: The challenges, http://www.cordis.lu/innovation-policy/studies/geo_study1.htm (4 December 2002) Havas, Attila (2002a): Conflicting Policy Needs in the First Decade of Transition: Macroeconomic and S&T policies in Hungary, 1990-2000, Budapest: Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, country report for the Macrotec project, mimeo Havas, Attila (2002b): Evolving Foresight in a Small Country in Transition: The design, use and relevance of foresight methods in Hungary, Journal of Forecasting, forthcoming Hobday, Michael (1995): Innovation in East Asia: The challenge to Japan, Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Inzelt, Annamária (1995): For a Better Understanding of the Innovation Process in Hungary, Brighton: University of Sussex, SPRU, STEEP Discussion Papers No. 22 Inzelt, Annamária (1996): Review of Recent Developments in Science and Technology in Hungary since 1991, OECD CCET/DSTI(95)10 Levin, Richard C., Alvin K. Klevirock, Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter (1987): Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 3, 783-820 Lundvall, Bengt-Åke, (ed.) (1992): National Systems of Innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, London: Pinter Lundvall, Bengt-Åke and Susana Borrás (1999): The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Metcalfe, Stanley J. and Luke Georghiou (1998): Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy, STI Review, No. 22, 75-100 Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney Winter (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Nelson, Richard R. (ed.) (1993): National Innovation Systems: A comparative study, New York: Oxford University Press Nelson, Richard R. (1995): Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change, Journal of Economic Literature 33(1), 48-90 OECD (1992): TEP: The Key Relationships, Paris: OECD OECD (1993): Science, Technology and Innovation Policies: Hungary, Paris: OECD OECD (1997): Creativity, Innovation and Job Creation, Paris: OECD OECD (1998): Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 1998, Paris: OECD OECD (1999): Managing National Innovation Systems, Paris: OECD OECD (2000): Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2000, Paris: OECD OECD (2001a): Innovative Networks: Co-operation in national innovation systems, Paris: OECD OECD (2001b): Main S&T Indicators, Paris: OECD OM (2000): Science and Technology Policy – 2000, Budapest: Oktatási Minisztérium OMFB (1995): A kormány műszaki fejlesztési koncepciója, Előterjesztés a kormány részére (The government’s concept on technological development: A proposal for the government), OMFB Híradó, November OMFB (1999): Innovation strategy for competitiveness, Budapest: OMFB Pungor, Ernő and Lajos Nyiri (1993) The Recognition of Science & Technology in Hungary, Technology in Society 15(1), 25-39 TEP (2001): Az Irányító Testület jelentése (Steering Group Report), TEP, Hungarian Technology Foresight Programme, Budapest: Oktatási Minisztérium |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61659 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Does innovation policy policy matter? The case of Hungary. (deposited 08 Jan 2015 19:45)
- Does innovation policy matter? The case of Hungary. (deposited 27 Jan 2015 20:17) [Currently Displayed]