Academic Publishing and Open Access

Müller-Langer, Frank and Scheufen, Marc (2012): Academic Publishing and Open Access. Published in: Handke, Christian and Ruth Towse (eds.), Handbook of the Digital Creative Economy, Edward Elgar , Vol. 2013, (2013): pp. 365-377.

Abstract

With the spread of the internet and new opportunities for publishing academic works digitally at virtually no costs, the traditional copyright model has recently been put under critical review which is for at least two reasons: First and foremost, a vast increase in subscription prices for academic journals has forced (university) libraries to significantly cut their journal portfolios. Second, copyright seems negligible in academia as researchers are motivated by reputation gains and CV effects rather than direct financial returns from publishing their works. As a consequence, the promotion of Open Access (OA) to scientific research is claimed as the perceived future of academic publishing in the information age.

This paper critically reviews the OA debate by discussing theoretical and empirical arguments on the role of copyright in publishing scientific outcomes. A brief historical perspective introduces to the changed environmental conditions for scholarly publishing, pointing to a new trade-off in the digital age. By framing the debate in a broader literature stream and related issues, we provide with caveat for further research and a glimpse of possible future scenarios. It is shown that copyright may be both a blessing and a curse in establishing an effective framework for scientific progress.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Copyright, Open Access, Academic Publishing
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L17 - Open Source Products and Markets; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

References

[1] Altman, Micah and Gary King (2007), ‘A proposed standard for the scholarly citation of quantitative data’, D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4).

[2] Anderson, Richard G., William H. Greene, Bruce D. McCullough and Hrishikesh D. Vinod(2008), ‘The role of data/code archives in the future of economic research’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 15, 99-119.

[3] Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick and Frank Mueller-Langer (2013), ‘Climbing the shoulders of giants: Open access to data’, European Datawatch Extended Working Paper, Mimeo.

[4] Arrow, Kenneth (1962), ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention’, in Richard Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, pp. 609-624.

[5] Bechtold, Stefan (2004), ‘Digital rights management in the United States and Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 52, 323-382.

[6] Bechtold, Stefan (2010), ‘Google Book Search – A rich field of scholarship’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 41(3), 1-2.

[7] Bergstrom, Theodore C. (2001), ‘Free labor for costly journals? ’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 183-198.

[8] Bergstrom, Theodore C. (2013), ‘Journal Pricing Page’, available at: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/jpricing.html (accessed 21 January 2013).

[9] Bernius, Steffen and Matthias Hanauske (2009), ‘Open Access to Scientific Literature – Increasing Citations as an Incentive for Authors to Make their Publications Freely Accessible’, Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS-42), Waikoloa, Hawaii.

[10] Bernius, Steffen, Matthias Hanauske, Wolfgang König and Berndt Dugall (2009), ‘Open access models and their implications for the players on the scientific publishing market’, Economic Analysis & Policy, 39(1), 103-115.

[11] Björk, Bo-Christer (2012), ‘The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles – A failed experiment?’, Journal of the American Society of Information Sciences and Technology, 63(8), 1496-1504.

[12] Bosch, Xavier (2009), ‘A reflection on open-access, citation counts, and the future ofscientific publishing’, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 57, 91-93.

[13] Brody, Tim, Stevan Harnad and Les Carr (2006), ‘Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1060-1072.

[14] Cavaleri, Michael, Giovanni B. Ramello and Vottorio Valli (2009), ‘Publishing an e-journal on a shoe string: Is it a sustainable project?’, Economic Analysis & Policy, 39(1), 89-101.

[15] Davis, Philip M. (2009), ‘Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3-8.

[16] Davis, Philip M., Bruce V. Lewenstein, Daniel H. Simon, James G. Booth and Mathew J. L. Connolly (2008), ‘Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial’, BMJ, 337, a568.

[17] Dewald, William G., Jerry G. Thursby and Richard G. Anderson (1986), ‘Replication in empirical economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project’, American Economic Review, 76, 587-603.

[18] Directory of Open Access Journals (2013), ‘DOAJ by Country’, available at: http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=byCountry&uiLanguage=en (accessed 21 January 2013).

[19] Edlin, Aaron S. and Daniel L. Rubinfeld (2004), ‘Exclusion or efficient pricing? The ‘big deal’ bundling of academic journals’, Antitrust Law Journal, 72, 128-59.

[20] Eger, Thomas and Marc Scheufen (2012a), ‘The past and the future of copyright law. Technological change and beyond’, in Jef De Mot (ed.), Liber Amicorum Boudewijn Bouckaert, Brugge, Belgium: die Keure, pp. 37-65.

[21] Eger, Thomas and Marc Scheufen (2012b), ‘Das Urheberrecht im Zeitenwandel: Von Gutenberg zum Cyberspace’, in Christian Müller, Frank Trosky and Marion Weber (eds.), Ökonomik als allgemeine Theorie menschlichen Verhaltens, Schriften zu Ordnungsfragen der Wirtschaft, 94, Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius, pp. 151-179.

[22] Eger, Thomas, Marc Scheufen and Daniel Meierrieks (2013), ‘Open access awareness and attitudes in different scientific disciplines’, University of Hamburg, Mimeo.

[23] Eysenbach, Gunther (2006), ‘Citation advantage of open access articles’, PLoS Biol 4(5): e157. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157 (accessed 21 January 2013).

[24] Feess, Eberhard and Marc Scheufen (2011), ‘Academic copyright in the publishing game: A contest perspective’, SSRN-Working Paper, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers%20.cfm?abstract_id=1793867 (accessed 21 January 2013).

[25] Gaulé, Patrick and Nicolas Maystreb (2011), ‘Getting cited: Does open access help?’, Research Policy, 40, 1332-1338.

[26] Grimmelmann, J. (2009), ‘How to fix the Google Book Search settlement’, Journal of Internet Law, 12(10), 10-20.

[27] Hajjem, Chawki, Stevan Harnad and Yves Gingras (2005), ‘Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact’, IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 18(4), 39-47.

[28] Harnad, Stevan (2012), ‘The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies’, available at: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html (accessed 21 January 2013).

[29] Harnad, Stevan, Tim Brody, Francois Vallières, Les Carr, Steve Hitchcock, Yves Gingras, Charles Oppenheim, Heinrich Stamerjohanns and Eberhard R. Hilf (2004), ‘The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access’, Serials Review, 30(4), 310-314.

[30] Hilty, Reto M. (2006), ‘Five lessons about copyright in the information society: Reaction of the scientific community to over-protection and what policy-makers should learn’, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 53(1), 103-38.

[31] Jeon, Doh-Shin and Jean-Charles Rochet (2010), ‘The pricing of academic journals: A twosided market perspective’, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2, 222-255.

[32] Lawrence, Steve and C. Lee Giles (2001), ‘Accessibility of information on the web’, Intelligence, 11(1), 32-39.

[33] Lemley, Mark (2011), ‘Is the sky falling on the content industries?’, Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 9, 125-135.

[34] Lichtman, Douglas (2008), ‘Copyright as innovation policy: Google Book Search from a Law and Economics perspective’, in Josh Lerner and Scott Stern (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 9, Cambridge, MA, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 55-77.

[35] Liebowitz, Stan L. (1985), ‘Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals’, Journal of Political Economy, 93(5), 945-957.

[36] Mann, Florian, Benedikt von Walter, Thomas Hess and Rolf T. Wigand (2008), ‘Open access publishing in science: Why it is highly appreciated but rarely used’, Communications of the ACM, 51.

[37] McCabe, Mark J. and Christopher M. Snyder (2005), ‘Open access and academic journal quality’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 95(2), 453-458.

[38] McCabe, Mark J. and Christopher M. Snyder (2007), ‘Academic journal prices in a digital age: A two-sided market model’, B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 7(1), Article 2.

[39] McCabe, Mark J. and Christopher M. Snyder (2011), ‘Did online access to journals change the economics literature?’, SSRN-Working Paper, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1746243 (accessed 21 January 2013).

[40] McCullough, Bruce D. (2009), ‘Open access economics journals and the market for reproducible economic research’, Economic Analysis & Policy, 39(1), 118-126.

[41] Mueller-Langer, Frank and Marc Scheufen (2011), ‘The Google Book Search Settlement: A Law and Economics analysis’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 8(1), 7-50.

[42] Mueller-Langer, Frank and Richard Watt (2010), ‘Copyright and open access for academic works’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7(1), 45-65.

[43] Mueller-Langer, Frank and Richard Watt (2012), ‘Optimal pricing and quality of academic journals and the ambiguous welfare effects of forced open access: A two-sided market model’, TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2012-019, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2045956 (accessed 21 January 2013).

[44] Mueller-Langer, Frank and Richard Watt (2013), ‘Analysis of the impact of hybrid open access on journals and authors’, University of Canterbury, Mimeo.

[45] Norris, Michael, Charles Oppenheim and Fytton Rowland (2008), ‘The citation advantage of open access articles’, Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963-1972.

[46] Picker, Randal C. (2009), ‘The Google Book Search Settlement: A new orphan-works monopoly?’, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 5(3), 383-409.

[47] Ramello, Giovanni B. (2010), ‘Copyright & endogenous market structure: A glimpse from the journal-publishing market’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 7(1), 7-29.

[48] Samuelson, Pamela (2010a), ‘Google Book Search and the future of books in cyberspace’, Minnesota Law Review, 94(5), 1308-1374.

[49] Samuelson, Pamela (2010b), ‘Legally speaking: The dead souls of the Google Book Search Settlement’, Communications of the ACM, 53(7), 32-34.

[50] Samuelson, Pamela (2010c), ‘Academic author objections to the Google Book Search Settlement’, Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 8, 491-522.

[51] Shavell, Steven (2010), ‘Should copyright of academic works be abolished?’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 2(1), 301-358.

[52] Suber, Peter (2012), Open Access, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press. Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports (2011), available at: http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/az/ journal_citation_reports/ (accessed 21 January 2013).

[53] Towse, Ruth, Christian Handke and Paul Stepan (2008), ‘The economics of copyright law: A stocktake of the literature’, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 5(1), 1-22.

[54] US District Court Southern District of New York(2011) , ‘Authors Guild et al. vs. Google Inc., Opinion 05 Civ. 8136 (DC)’, available at: http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/googlebooksopinion.pdf (accessed 21 January 2013).