Rubin, Jared and Sheremeta, Roman (2015): Principal-Agent Settings with Random Shocks. Forthcoming in: Management Science
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_61904.pdf Download (719kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Using a gift exchange experiment, we show that the ability of reciprocity to overcome incentive problems inherent in principal-agent settings is greatly reduced when the agent’s effort is distorted by random shocks and transmitted imperfectly to the principal. Specifically, we find that gift exchange contracts without shocks encourage effort and wages well above standard predictions. However, the introduction of random shocks reduces wages and effort, regardless of whether the shocks can be observed by the principal. Moreover, the introduction of shocks significantly reduces the probability of fulfilling the contract by the agent, the payoff of the principal, and total welfare. Therefore, our findings demonstrate that random shocks place an important bound on the ability of gift exchange to overcome principal-agent problems.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Principal-Agent Settings with Random Shocks |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | gift exchange, principal-agent model, contract theory, reciprocity, effort, shocks, laboratory experiment |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General |
Item ID: | 61904 |
Depositing User: | Roman Sheremeta |
Date Deposited: | 07 Feb 2015 02:54 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 03:55 |
References: | Abbink, Klaus, Bernd Irlenbusch, and Elke Renner. (2000). “The moonlighting game: An experimental study on reciprocity and retribution.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 42(2): 265-277. Aimone, Jason A., and Daniel Houser. (2011). “Beneficial Betrayal Aversion.” PLoS ONE 6(3): e17725. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017725. Andreoni, James, and B. Douglas Bernheim. (2009). “Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects.” Econometrica 77(5): 1607-1636. Andreoni, James, William Harbaugh, and Lise Vesterlund. (2003). “The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments, and Cooperation.” American Economic Review 93(3): 893-902. Azrieli, Yaron, Christopher P. Chambers, and Paul J. Healy. (2013). “Incentives in Experiments: A Theoretical Analysis.” Working Paper. Baker, George P. (1992). “Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement.” Journal of Political Economy 100(3): 598-614. Baron, Jonathan, and Hershey, John C. (1988). “Outcome bias in decision evaluation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(4): 569-579. Bartling, Björn, Ernst Fehr, and Klaus M. Schmidt. (2012). “Screening, Competition, and Job Design: Economic Origins of Good Jobs.” American Economic Review 102(2): 834-64. Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., and Vohs, K. (2001). “Bad is stronger than good.” Review of General Psychology 5(4): 323-370. Bellemare, Charles and Kroger, Sabine. (2007). “On representative social capital.” European Economic Review 51(1): 183-202. Cameron, A. Colin, Jonah B. Gelbach, and Douglas L. Miller. (2008). "Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors." Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3): 414-427. Cappelen, Alexander W., James Konow, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden. (2013). “Just Luck: An Experimental Study of Risk-Taking and Fairness” American Economic Review 103(4): 1398-1413. Charness, Gary and Ernan Haruvy. (2002). “Altruism, equity, and reciprocity in a gift-exchange experiment: an encompassing approach.” Games and Economic Behavior 40(2): 203-231. Charness, Gary, and Uri Gneezy. (2008). “What's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 68(1): 29-35. Charness, Gary and Kuhn, Peter. (2011). “Lab labor: What can labor economists learn from the lab?” In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, pp. 229-330. Charness, Gary and Martin Dufwenberg. (2006). “Promises and partnership.” Econometrica 74(6): 1579-1601. Charness, Gary, and D. I. Levine. (2007). “Intention and Stochastic Outcomes: An Experimental study.” Economic Journal 117(522): 1051-1072. Charness, Gary. (2004). “Attribution and Reciprocity in an Experimental Labor Market.” Journal of Labor Economics 22(3): 665-688. Dufwenberg, Martin, and Georg Kirchsteiger. (2004). “A theory of sequential reciprocity.” Games and Economic Behavior 47(2): 268-298. Ericsson, K. Anders and Neil Charness. (1994). “Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition.” American Psychologist 49(8): 725-747. Erkal, Nisvan, Gangadharan, Lata, and Nikos Nikiforakis. (2011). “Relative Earnings and Giving in a Real-Effort Experiment.” American Economic Review 101(7): 3330-3348. Falk, Armin, and Urs Fischbacher. (2006). “A theory of reciprocity.” Games and Economic Behavior 54(2): 293-315. Fehr, Ernst, and Klaus M. Schmidt. (2007). “Adding a Stick to the Carrot? The Interaction of Bonuses and Fines.” American Economic Review 97(2): 177-181. Fehr, Ernst, and Simon Gächter. (2000). “Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 159-181. Fehr, Ernst, Simon Gächter, and Georg Kirchsteiger (1997). “Reciprocity as a Contract Enforcement Device: Experimental Evidence.” Econometrica 65(4): 833-860. Fischbacher, Urs. (2007). “z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments.” Experimental Economics 10(2): 171-178. Gasper, John T. and Andrew Reeves. (2011). “Make It Rain? Retrospection and the Attentive Electorate in the Context of Natural Disasters.” American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 340-355. Gneezy, Uri, and John A. List. (2006). “Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments.” Econometrica, 74(5): 1365-1384. Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver D. Hart. (1983). “An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem.” Econometrica 51(1): 7-45. Gurdal, M., Miller, J., and Rustichini, A. (2013). “Why Blame?” Working Paper.” Journal of Political Economy 121(6): 1205-1247. Gürerk1, Özgür, Bernd Irlenbusch, and Bettina Rockenbach. (2006). “The Competitive Advantage of Sanctioning Institutions.” Science 312(5770): 108-111. Harris, Milton and Artur Raviv. (1979). “Optimal Incentive Contracts with Imperfect Information.” Journal of Economic Theory 20(2): 231-259. Healy, Andrew, Neil Malhotra, and Cecilia Hyunjung Mo. (2010). “Irrelevant events affect voters' evaluations of government performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(29): 12804-12809. Holmström, Bengt, and Paul Milgrom. (1991). “Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7: 24-52. Holmström, Bengt. (1979). “Moral Hazard and Observability.” Bell Journal of Economics 10(1): 74-91. Houser, Daniel, Erte Xiao, Kevin McCabe, and Vernon Smith. (2008). “When punishment fails: Research on sanctions, intentions, and non-cooperation.” Games and Economic Behavior 62(2): 509-532. Konow, James. (2000). “Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions.” American Economics Review 90(4): 1072-1091. Konow, James. (2003). “Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories.” Journal of Economic Literature 41(4): 1188-1239. Laffont, Jean-Jacques and David Martimort. (2002). The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton: Princeton University Press. List, John A. (2007). “On the interpretation of giving in dictator games.” Journal of Political Economy 115(3): 482-493. Marshall, Greg W., and John C. Mowen, (1993). “An Experimental Investigation of the Outcome Bias in Salesperson Performance Evaluations.” Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 13(3): 31-47. Mazzocco, Philip J., Mark D. Alicke, and Teresa L. Davis. (2004). “On the Robustness of Outcome Bias: No Constraint by Prior Culpability.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 26(2-3): 131-146. Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Offerman, T., (2002). “Hurting hurts more than helping helps.” European Economic Review 46(8): 1423-1437. Prendergast, Canice. (1999). “The Provision of Incentives in Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature 37(1): 7-63. Rabin, Matthew. (1993). “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics.” American Economic Review 83(5): 1281-1302. Rey-Biel, Pedro, Roman Sheremeta, and Neslihan Uler. (2015). “Effort and Luck: The Effects of Information and Culture on Giving” ESI Working Paper. Sefton, Martin, Robert Shupp, and James M. Walker. (2007). "The Effect Of Rewards And Sanctions In Provision Of Public Goods." Economic Inquiry 45(4): 671-690. Shavell, Steven. (1979). “Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship.” Bell Journal of Economics 10(1): 55-73. Sloof, Randolph, and C. Mirjam Van Praag. (2010). “The effect of noise in a performance measure on work motivation: A real effort laboratory experiment.” Labour Economics 17(5): 751-765. Xiao, Erte and Howard Kunreuther. (2015). "Punishment and Cooperation in Stochastic Prisoner’s Dilemma Game." Journal of Conflict Resolution, forthcoming. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/61904 |