Post-Soviet Integration Breakthrough. Why the Customs Union Has More Chances Than Its Predecessors

Vinokurov, Evgeny and Libman, Alexander (2012): Post-Soviet Integration Breakthrough. Why the Customs Union Has More Chances Than Its Predecessors. Published in: Russia in Global Affairs No. 2 (June 2012): pp. 154-163.

Abstract

Within a span of several years, post-Soviet integration has evolved from a largely paper project and rhetoric construct — which certain countries exploited to suit their domestic policies — into an important factor influencing economic development. However, its further prospects are unclear. On the one hand, it is the current format of a small group of countries with a clear objective (trade and economic rapprochement) that made the Customs Union a success. On the other hand, a truly big success can only be achieved by crossing the present-day borders — both geographic (for example, by stepping up interaction with China and the European Union) and functional — by handling the movement of production factors, ensuring uniform rules of the game (technical regulation, and access to monopolies’ services) and guaranteeing the coordination of macroeconomic policy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: regional integration, economic integration, post-Soviet, Russia, Eurasia, Customs Union, Kazakhstan, Eurasian Economic Union
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy

References

Alexander Libman, “Regionalization and Regionalism in the Post-Soviet Space: Current Status and Implications for Institutional Development,” Europe-Asia Studies 59, no. 3 (2007): 401-430

Alexander Libman and Evgeny Vinokurov, “Holding Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration”, Palgrave MacMillan (Basingstoke) 2012

Alexander Libman and Evgeny Vinokurov, “Post-Soviet Integration and the Interaction of Functional Bureaucracies,” Review of International Political Economy (2012): 1-28.

Oraz Jandosov and Lyaziza Sabyrova, “Indicative Trade Protection Level in Kazakhstan: Before and After the Customs Union,” RAKURS Discussion Paper No. 5.3 and 5.4 (2011).

Olivier Blanchard and Michael Kremer, “Disorganization,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1997): 1091-1126.

Mikhail Golovnin and Alexandra Yakusheva, “Regional Effects of Global Economic Crisis in CIS: Migrants’ Remittances Channel,” EDB Eurasian Integration Yearbook (2011): 55-74.

Andrei Korobkov, “Migration Trends in Central Eurasia: Politics versus Economics,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40 (2007): 169-189.

Evgeny Vinokurov, ed., EDB System of Indicators of Eurasian Integration (EDB, 2010

Tom Caiser, “Are the Policies of Russia and the EU in their Shared Neighborhood Doomed to Clash,” in Roger E. Kanet and Maria Raquel Freire (eds.) Competing for Influence: the EU and Russia in post-Soviet Eurasia (Republics of Letters Publishing, 2012)

Evgeny Vinokurov, “The CIS Common Electric Power Markets,” EDB Industry Report No. 3 (2008).

Jesper Jensen and David Tarr, “Impact of Local Content Restrictions and Barriers against Foreign Direct Investment in Services: the Case of Kazakhstan Accession to the WTO,” Eastern European Economics 46 (2008): 5-26.

Bartolomej Kaminski, Martin Kholmatov, Saumya Mitra and Gael Raballand, “Asiaregio: An Institutional Model to Deepen Integration in Central Asia’s Border Regions,” Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies 2 (2010): 347-360