Fabian, Capitanio and Felice, Adinolfi and Fabio G., Santeramo (2014): Crop insurance subsidies and environmental externalities: evidence from Southern Italy.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_62505.pdf Download (91kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Rapid environmental changes can affect agriculture by introducing additional sources of uncertainty. Conversely, policy interventions to help farmers cope with risks may have strong impacts on the environment. In this paper, we evaluate the effects of public risk management programmes, particularly subsidies on crop insurance, on fertilizer use and land allocation. We implement a mathematical programming model based on data collected from 1,092 farms in Puglia, a southern Italy region. The results show that under the current crop insurance programmes, input use is expected to increase, while the effect on production is likely to be crop-specific. The policy and environmental implications are discussed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Crop insurance subsidies and environmental externalities: evidence from Southern Italy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | uncertainty; risk management; input use; multifunctionality |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General |
Item ID: | 62505 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo |
Date Deposited: | 03 Mar 2015 17:13 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 09:57 |
References: | Ahsan, S. M., A. Ali, and N. J. Kurian, 1982.Toward a Theory of Agricultural Insurance.American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol. 64, pp.520-529. Babcock, B. A., and Hennessy, D. A. (1996). Input demand under yield and revenue insurance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 78, No.2, pp. 416-427. Borriello R. (2003) Assicurazioni, gestione dei rischi in agricoltura e garanzia dei redditi, ISMEA, Roma. Briys, E. and L. Eeckhoudt, 1985. Relative Risk Aversion in Comparative Statics: Comment. American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. Vol.75, No 1, pp. 281-83, March. Cafiero, C., F. Capitanio, A.Cioffi, and A. Coppola, 2007. Risk and Crisis Management in the Reformed European Agricultural Policy.Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.55, pp. 419-441. Capitanio, F., and Adinolfi, F. (2009). The relationship between agricultural insurance and environmental externalities from agricultural input use: a literature review and methodological approach. New Medit, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 41-48. Capitanio, F., Adinolfi, F., and Santeramo, F. G. (forthcoming 2014). Environmental implications of crop insurance subsidies in Southern Italy. International Journal of Environmental Studies. Di Falco, S., Adinolfi, F., Bozzola, M., and Capitanio, F. (2014). Crop Insurance as a Strategy for Adapting to Climate Change. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 485-504. Dorling, S. (2014). Managing climate variability in agriculture: Using weather forecasting to support farming adaptation. Outlook on Agriculture, Vol.43, No 1, pp. 13-18. Enjolras, G., Capitanio, F., and Adinolfi, F. (2012).The demand for crop insurance. Combined approaches for France and Italy. Agricultural Economics Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 5-15. Goodwin, B.K., Ker, A.P. (1998). Nonparametric Estimation of Crop Yield Distributions: Implications for Rating Group-Risk Crop Insurance Contracts. American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol.80, No 1, pp.139-153. Goodwin, B. K., Ker, A.P. (2002) Modeling Price and Yield Risk.”A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in U. S. Agriculture. R. E. Just and R. D. Pope, eds. pp. 289-323. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston 2002. Goodwin, B. K., and V. H. Smith, 2003. An Ex-Post Evaluation of the Conservation Reserve, Federal Crop Insurance, and Other Government Programs: Program Participation and Soil Erosion. Journal of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsVol.28, pp. 201-216. Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis, 4rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International, 2000. Horowitz, J. K., and E. Lichtenberg, 1993.Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Chemical Use in Agriculture.”American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol.75, pp. 926-935. Ishii Y., 1977. On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty: Note. The American Economic Review, Vol.67, No 4, pp. 768-769. Ismea (2011) L’assicurazione agricola agevolata in Italia. Ismea (2013) L’evoluzione delle assicurazioni agricole agevolate e lo sviluppo di strumenti innovativi. Knox, J., Morris, J., Hess, T. (2010). Identifying future risks to UK agricultural crop production: Putting climate change in context. Outlook on Agriculture, Vol. 39, No 4, pp.249-256. Knox, J. W., Wade, S. (2012). Assessing climate risks to UK agriculture.Nature Climate Change, Vol. 2, No 6, pp. 378-378. Lambert, D. K., and B. A. McCarl(1985) Risk modelingusing direct solution of nonlinear approximations of the utility function. American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol.67, pp. 846-852. Mishra, A. K., Wesley Nimon, R., and El-Osta, H. S. (2005). Is moral hazard good for the environment? Revenue insurance and chemical input use.Journal of environmental management, Vol. 74, No.1, 11-20. Moschini, G., and Hennessy, D. A. (2001).Uncertainty, risk aversion, and risk management for agricultural producers. Handbook of agricultural economics, Vol. 1, pp. 88-153. Nelson, C.H., and P.V. Preckel, 1989.The Conditional Beta Distribution as a Stochastic Production Function.”American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol.71, No 1, pp. 370-378. Plantinga A.J., 1996. The Effect of Agricultural Policies on Land Use and Environmental Quality.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.78, No 4, pp. 1082-1091. Pope, R. D., Kramer, R. A. (1979). Production uncertainty and factor demands for the competitive firm.Southern Economic Journal, pp. 489-501. Pratt J.W., 1964. Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large, Econometrica, Vol. 32, p.122-36. Quiggin, J. (1992). Generalized expected utility theory: The rank dependent model. Springer. Richardson, J., Condra, G. (1981). Farm Size Evaluation in the El Paso Valley: A Survival/Success Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics Vol. 63, pp. 430-437. Sandmo A., 1971. On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty. The American Economic Review, Vol.61, No 1, pp. 65-73. Santeramo, F. G., Di Pasquale, J., Contò, F., Tudisca, S., and Sgroi, F. (2012). Analyzing risk management in Mediterranean Countries: the Syrian perspective.New Medit. Vol.3, pp. 35-40. Santeramo F. G., Capitanio F., and Adinolfi F. (2014) Integrating agricultural risks management strategies in selected EU Partner Countries: Syria, Tunisia, Turkey. Romanian Journal of European Affairs. Vol. 14 No. 3., pp. 22-35. Santeramo, Fabio G. & Goodwin, Barry K. & Adinolfi, Felice & Capitanio, Fabian, 2013. "Revisiting the demand for crop insurance: evidences from the Italian market," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150184, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. Seo, S., Mitchell, P.D., and Leatham D.J., 2005.“Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics”.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol.37, pp. 685-699. Smith, V. H., and B. K. Goodwin, 1996.Crop Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Agricultural Chemical Use.American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVol.78, pp.428-38. Van Asseldonk, M. A., Pietola, K., and Niemi, J. K. (2013). Trade-offs between catastrophic assistance and subsidized insurance in European agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture, Vol.42, No 4, pp. 225-231. Von Neumann, Morgenstern O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ, 1944. Wu, J., 1999. Crop Insurance, Acreage Decisions, and Nonpoint-Source Pollution, American Journal of Agricultural Economics Vol. 81, pp. 305-320. Zheng, L., Liu, H. (2013). Evaluating multifunctional agriculture in Dalishu, China: A combined application of SWOT analysis and the analytic network process method.Outlook on Agriculture, Vol. 42, No 2, pp. 103-108. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/62505 |