Neoclassical Versus Keynesian Approach to Public Policy – The Need for Synthesis

Khan, Mohd Saeed and Aziz, Ghazala (2011): Neoclassical Versus Keynesian Approach to Public Policy – The Need for Synthesis.

Abstract

The global economic recession following the financial crises once again revived the debate over the efficacy of Keynesian solution to deal with the crises. Most of the country went in to offer bailout packages from the public budget which could be the reminiscent of such policies adopted earlier – New Deal of President Roosevelt of US is case in point. Keynes was the first person to provide theoretical justification for the deficits in public budget to raise the aggregate spending level in the economy which, in turn, would raise the employment level. Keynesian advocacy would have remained unheeded had the crises of 1930s not occurred. The crises offered the opportunity to put the Keynesian solution to test. The approached worked. But by the end of the decade of 70s this approach was abandoned and neoclassicism not only resurfaced but became the bases for the policy not only for nations but for multilateral financial institutions as well. It was the crises again which brought back the Keynesian wisdom to relevance. The present paper assesses the two approaches in the historical context to find if synthesis between neoclassical and Keynesian approach is possible to make the public policy more effective.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Deficits, Public budget, Global crises
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives ; Policy Designs and Consistency ; Policy Coordination; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy

References

1. Fama, Eugene (1970): “Efficient Capital Market: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”, Journal of Finance, 25. 2. Keyens, J M (1919): “The Economic Consequences of Peace” (London: Macmillan) 3. _________ (1924): “A Tract on Monetary Reform” (London: Macmillan)

4. _________ (1936): The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London: Macmillan) 5. J M Keynes and H Henderson (1972) “Can Lloyd George Do It?” The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. IX, p. 126

6. Robinson Joan (1962): Economic Philosophy (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books)

7. Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1939): Business Cycles (New York: McGraw-Hill)

8. Seshan, A (1987), “The Burden of Domestic Debt in India” RBI Occasional Papers, Vol.8, No.1, June 1987