Aziz, Ghazala and Khan, Mohd Saeed (2010): The Dynamics of Fiscal Federalism in India and the Global Financial crises.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_62857.pdf Download (319kB) | Preview |
Abstract
India's fiscal federalism, though asymmetric in nature has so far worked well to keep the federation going. The asymmetry is both vertical as well as horizontal. Former is in terms of the disproportionate allocations of revenue sources and the responsibilities to be discharged to the Central and State governments and the latter, in terms of fiscal capacity of the States themselves. In order to make up for the inadequacy of revenue there is well elaborate mechanism of fiscal transfers from Centre to States. The channels of these transfers are statutory as well as non-statutory. This creates a problem that while States might be getting resources but are deprived of the fiscal instruments to pursue public policies. But the division of fiscal function is well in tune with the principles suggested by Musgrave in late fifties according to which 'economic stabilization' and 'distribution' to be assigned to Centre government while 'allocation' to the States. On and off there have been the conflicts but political economic factors always played a role in their resolutions. Problem gets compounded by the fact that since monetary initiatives are with the Centre it can - in fact it does - use them to counter balance any fiscal profligacy committed on account of political expediency (fiscal measures are politically more sensitive). There is empirical evidence that fiscal transfers could not succeed in bringing about revenue equalization or augmenting the fiscal capacity of States while there have been instances of Centre transgressing into the fiscal space of the States. Responding to the global financial crises and resultant economic slow down Centre came out with stimulus packages by putting a pause on the requirements of Fiscal Responsibility Act. While States were also permitted to defer the same to meet the challenges only a handful of States could come out with any package. Proposed study seeks to analyze the dynamics of federalism during the recent crises.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Dynamics of Fiscal Federalism in India and the Global Financial crises |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | federalism, global financial crises |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt |
Item ID: | 62857 |
Depositing User: | ghazala aziz |
Date Deposited: | 16 Mar 2015 15:48 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 06:53 |
References: | 1. Arvind Subramanian, John Williamson (2009): The World Crisis: Reforms to Prevent a Recurrence. Economic & Political Weekly, March 28, Vol.XLIV No.13. 2. Bagchi, Amaresh (2001): Perspectives on Correcting Fiscal Imbalance in the Indian Economy. ICRA Bulletin, Money and Finance, Jan-June 2001. 3. Bhaduri Amit (2009) Understanding the Financial Crises. Economic and Political Weekly March 28 – April 3, Vol XLIV, No. 13. 4. Blinder, Alan S. and Robert M. Solow (1973): “Does Fiscal Policy Matter”, Journal of Public Economics, 1973. 5. Breton, Albert (2000) “Federalism and Decentralization: Ownership Rights and the Superiority of Federalism”, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 30. No. 2. 6. Chakraborty, Pinaki (1998): “Growing Imbalances in Federal Fiscal Relationship”, Economic and Political Weekly, February 14, 1998. 7. Elmendorf Douglas W. And Jason Furman (2008), “If, When, How: A Primer on Fiscal Stimulus”, The Hamilton Project, Strategy Paper, January. 8. Feldstein Martin (2002), “The Role for Discretionary Fiscal Policy in a Low Interest Rate Environment”, NBER Working Paper 9203. 9. Freedman C., M. Kumhof, D. Laxton and J. Lee (2009) “The Case for Global Fiscal Stimulus”, IMF Staff Position Note, March 6. 10. Government of India RBI (2009): The External Economies III. 11. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2008), World Economic Outlook, September. 12. Kumar Arun (2009): “Tackling the Current Crises” Economic & Political Weekly, March 28, 2009. 13. Mihir Rakshit (2009): India amidst the Global Crisis, Economic & Political Weekly, March 28, Vol. XLIV No.13. 14. Musgrave RA (1959): The Theory of Public Finance. McGraw Hill, New York. 15. Rao, M.Govinda and Tapas K. Sen (1996): “Fiscal Federalism in India- Theory and Practice”, Macmillan, Delhi. 16. Ram Mohan TT (2009): The Impact of the Crisis on the Indian Economy. Economic & Political Weekly, March 28, Vol.XLIV No.13. 17. Seshan A (1987): The Burden of Domestic Public Debt in India. RBI Occasional Papers, June. 18. Taylor John B. (2000), “Reassessing Discretionary Fiscal Policy”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, Vol. 14(3). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/62857 |