Ahlheim, Michael and Frör, Oliver and Langenberger, Gerhard and Pelz, Sonna (2014): Chinese urbanites and the preservation of rare species in remote parts of the country: the example of eaglewood. Published in: Environmental Economics , Vol. 5, No. 4 (December 2015): pp. 32-43.
Preview |
PDF
ee_2014_04_Ahlheim.pdf Download (174kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Based on a contingent valuation study in Shanghai the authors assess people’s willingness to contribute personally to the alleviation of environmental problems occurring in distant parts of the country. One split of survey assessed Shanghai residents’ willingness to pay for the preservation of rainforest in Yunnan, while the other split referred to the willingness to pay for the preservation of a single plant species (i.e. eaglewood) growing in this rainforest. The objectives of this study were twofold. Firstly, the authors wanted to find out if people living in big Chinese cities like Shanghai take an interest in the environmental problems existing in some remote parts of the country and if they are willing to contribute personally to remedy these problems. Secondly, the authors wanted to learn more about the motivation behind this kind of empathy, if it exists. The researchers were especially interested in the question if this empathy refers to the specific environmental problems addressed in the surveys or if it is motivated more by a general feeling of obligation towards environmental issues.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Chinese urbanites and the preservation of rare species in remote parts of the country: the example of eaglewood |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | eaglewood, rubber cultivation, biodiversity preservation, contingent valuation, ecosystem services, China. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology |
Item ID: | 62897 |
Depositing User: | Sonna Pelz |
Date Deposited: | 16 Mar 2015 14:36 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 07:31 |
References: | 1. Abadie, A. & Imbens, G.W. (2011). Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, p. 29. 2. Ahlheim, M., Börger, T. & Frör, O. (2012). The ecological price of getting rich in a green desert: A contingent valuation study in rural Southwest China, FZDI Discussion Paper, Stuttgart. 3. Ahlheim, M. & Frör, O. (2003). Valuing the non-market production of agriculture, Agrarwirtschaft, 52, pp. 356-369. 4. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving? The Economic Journal, 100, pp. 464-477. 5. Bateman, I. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques : a manual, Cheltenham [u.a.], Elgar. 6. Boyle, K.J., Desvousges, W.H., Johnson, F.R., Dunford, R.W. & Hudson, S.P. (1994). An investigation of part-whole biases in contingent-valuation studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, pp. 64-83. 7. Brown, T.C. & Duffield, J.W. (1995). Testing Part‐Whole Valuation Effects in Contingent Valuation of Instream Flow Protection, Water Resources Research, 31, pp. 2341-2351. 8. Carson, R.T. & Mitchell, R.C. (1993). The issue of scope in contingent valuation studies, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, pp. 1263-1267. 9. Carson, R.T. & Mitchell, R.C. (1995). Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys, Journal of environmental economics and Management, 28, pp. 155-173. 10. Chen, W.Y. & Jim, C. (2008). Cost-benefit analysis of the leisure value of urban greening in the new Chinese city of Zhuhai, Cities, 25, pp. 298-309. 11. Chen, W.Y. & Jim, C. (2010). Resident motivations and willingness-to-pay for urban biodiversity conservation in Guangzhou (China), Environmental management, 45, pp. 1052-1064. 12. Chetpattananondh, P. (2012). Overview of the agarwood industry. IFEAT International Conference “Essential Asia”, Singapore. International Federation of Essential Oils, Book of abstracts, pp. 1-13. 13. Dong, Y. (2012). Contingent valuation of Yangtze finless porpoises in Poyang Lake, China, Springer. 14. Gunn, B.V., Stevens, P., Singadan, M., Sunari, L. & Chatterton, P. (2004). Eaglewood in Papua New Guinea. Canberra, Resource Management in Asia-Pacific Program: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University. 15. Huang, J.Q., Wei, J.H., Zhang, Z., Yang, Y., Liu, Y.Y., Meng, H., Zhang, X.L. & Zhang, J.L. (2013). Historical records and modern studies on agarwood production method and overall agarwood production method (in Chinese), Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, 38, pp. 302-306. 16. IUCN (2013). IUCN Red list of threatened Species. Version 2013.2. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org (Accessed May 14, 2014). 17. Jung, D. (2013). The Cultural Biography of Agarwood – Perfumery in Eastern Asia and the Asian Neighbourhood, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (Third Series), 23, pp. 103-125. 18. Kahneman, D. & Knetsch, J.L. (1992). Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, pp. 57-70. 19. Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, Cambridge University Press. 20. Nunes, P.A.L.D. (2002). The contingent valuation of natural parks : assessing the warmglow propensity factor, Cheltenham, Elgar. 21. Persoon, G.A. (2007). Agarwood: the life of a wounded tree. International Institute for Asian Studies (IIAS). 22. Robins, J.M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric efficiency in multivariate regression models with missing data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, pp. 122-129. 23. Shanghai Municipal Statistics Bureau (2013). Shanghai Statistical Yearbook, Shanghai, P.R. China, China Statistics Press. 24. Spash, C.L. (2006). Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness To Pay for Environmental Improvements, Land Economics, 82, pp. 602-622. 25. Stern, D.I. (2014). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Primer. Centre for Climate Economics & Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University. 26. Wang, F. & Xu, S. (2009). Impact of Cultural Values on Consumption Behavior: A Survey of Contemporary Chinese University Students, Intercultural Communication Studies XVIII, pp. 260-285. 27. Wang, Y. & Zhang, Y.-S. (2009). Air quality assessment by contingent valuation in Ji’nan, China, Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 1022-1029. 28. Whitehead, J.C., Haab, T.C. & Huang, J.-C. (1998). Part-whole bias in contingent valuation: will scope effects be detected with inexpensive survey methods? Southern Economic Journal, pp. 160-168. 29. Wooldridge, J.M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, MIT press. 30. Xu, J., Grumbine, R.E. & Beckschäfer, P. (2014). Landscape transformation through the use of ecological and socioeconomic indicators in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China, Mekong Region, Ecological Indicators, 36, pp. 749-756. 31. Zhang, W.-W. (2011). Measuring the value of water quality improvements in Lake Tai, China, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCEA, 12, pp. 710-719. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/62897 |