Marti, Josep and Alguacil, Maite and Orts, Vicente (2015): Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of European Multinationals.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_63182.pdf Download (578kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper we investigate how the different characteristics of European multinational firms affect their decision to locate in different foreign markets. Considering the existence of n geographically separated markets with different attributes, in terms of entry or fixed costs, variable production costs and the market potential, our theoretical model shows that both firm and country characteristics determine the location of multinational firms. The model reveals that given the characteristics of the countries, the decision to enter a specific country in order to serve all markets globally will depend on all the sources of a firm’s heterogeneity. In the empirical analysis, we drawn on a dataset comprised of harmonized and detailed firm-level data across European countries for 2008 (EFIGE dataset). The results obtained confirm that firms’ international location decision reflects the underlying dissimilarities of European multinational firms, including the specific industry in which they operate. More specifically, our estimations show that among European firms investing in non-European countries, only the most productive firms invest in Latin America and those that decide to enter North America are more productive than firms that locate in China and India. However, we find that this ranking may vary across industries, depending not only on TFP, but also on the years of establishment and the firms’ human capital and R&D intensity.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of European Multinationals |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | multinational firms, firm heterogeneity, location choices, European FDI |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F21 - International Investment ; Long-Term Capital Movements F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business |
Item ID: | 63182 |
Depositing User: | Josep Marti |
Date Deposited: | 24 Mar 2015 14:36 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 16:44 |
References: | Altomonte, C., and Aquilante, T. (2012). The EU-EFIGE/Bruegel-unicredit dataset (No. 2012/13). Bruegel working paper. Aw, B. Y., and Lee, Y. (2008). Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Taiwanese multinationals. Journal of International Economics, 75 (1), 167-179. Baldwin, R. (2006). Globalisation: the great unbundling (s). Economic Council of Finland, 20(2006), 5-47. Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., and Pfaffermayr, M. (2007). Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects? Journal of Econometrics, 140 (1), 260-281. Basile, R., Castellani, D., and Zanfei, A. (2008). Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: The role of EU cohesion policy. Journal of International Economics, 74 (2), 328-340. Blonigen, B. A., Davies, R. B., Waddell, G. R., and Naughton, H. T. (2007). FDI in space: Spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment. European Economic Review, 51 (5), 1303-1325. Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jenson, J. B., and Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review, 93 (4), 1268-1290. Castellani, D., and Zanfei, A. (2007). Internationalisation, innovation and productivity: How do firms differ in Italy? The World Economy, 30 (1), 156-176. Chen, M. X., and Moore, M. O. (2010). Location decision of heterogeneous multinational firms. Journal of International Economics, 80 (2), 188-199. Chung, W., and Alcácer, J. (2002). Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Science, 48, 1534-1554. Crozet, M., Mayer, T., and Mucchielli, J. L. (2004). How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34 (1), 27-54. Eaton, J., Kortum, S., and Kramarz, F. (2004). Dissecting trade: Firms, industries, and export destinations (No. w10344). National Bureau of Economic Research. Ekholm, K., Forslid, R., and Markusen, J. R. (2007). Export‐Platform Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5 (4), 776-795. Girma, S., Görg, H., and Strobl, E. (2004). Exports, international investment, and plant performance: evidence from a non-parametric test. Economics Letters, 83(3), 317-324. Girma, S., Kneller, R., and Pisu, M. (2005). Exports versus FDI: an empirical test. Review of World Economics, 141 (2), 193-218. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., and Szeidl, A. (2006). Optimal integration strategies for the multinational firm. Journal of International Economics, 70 (1), 216-238. Hanson, G. H., Mataloni Jr, R. J., and Slaughter, M. J. (2001). Expansion strategies of US multinational firms (No. w8433). National Bureau of Economic Research. Head, K., and Ries, J. (2003). Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers. Journal of the Japanese and international economies, 17 (4), 448-467. Head, K., and Mayer, T. (2004). Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86 (4), 959-972. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., and Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94 (1), 300-316. Kimura, F., and Kiyota, K. (2006). Exports, FDI, and productivity: Dynamic evidence from Japanese firms. Review of World Economics, 142 (4), 695-719. Martí, J., Alguacil, M., and Orts, V (2015). Location choice of Spanish multinational firms in developing and transition economies, Journal of Business Economics and Management, forthcoming. Mayer, T., Méjean, I., and Nefussi, B. (2010). The location of domestic and foreign production affiliates by French multinational firms. Journal of Urban Economics, 68 (2), 115-128. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. In: Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, Chap. 4. Academic Press, New York, 105–142. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71 (6), 1695-1725. Melitz, M. J, and Redding, S. J. (2014). Missing Gains from Trade? American Economic Review, 104(5), 317-2. Nocke, V. and Yeaple, S. (2007): “Cross-border mergers and acquisitions vs. greenfield foreign direct investment: The role of firm heterogeneity”. Journal of International Economics, 72, pp.336-365. Tomiura, E. (2007). Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level. Journal of International Economics, 72 (1), 113-127. UNCTAD (2006): World Investment Report 2006. United Nations, New York. Yeaple, S. R. (2003). The complex integration strategies of multinationals and cross country dependencies in the structure of foreign direct investment. Journal of International Economics, 60 (2), 293-314. Yeaple, S. R. (2009). Firm heterogeneity and the structure of US multinational activity. Journal of International Economics, 78 (2), 206-215. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/63182 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of European Multinationals. (deposited 23 Mar 2015 15:17)
- Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of European Multinationals. (deposited 24 Mar 2015 14:36) [Currently Displayed]