How well has the Social Protection Scheme Reduced Vulnerability in Chile?

Bronfman, Javier and Floro, Maria (2014): How well has the Social Protection Scheme Reduced Vulnerability in Chile?

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates the impact of Chile’s social protection’s monetary subsidies on vulnerability to poverty during 1996-2006. Using the National Socioeconomic Characterization panel survey data, we adopt the Chaudhuri et al. (2002) method to estimate vulnerability. Since access to monetary subsidies is not random, we use the propensity score matching method to address the problem of selection bias in testing the effect of these transfers. The effect of the social protection transfers on vulnerability is examined both for the entire sample and the poor using Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) approach and sensitivity analyses. Our results suggest that the impact of the monetary subsidies is limited and mixed. They tend to help lower the vulnerability of those who have access to these subsidies in all three periods covered by the survey, but the subsidies show limited effect on the transitory poor. In general, we find that these subsidies are unable to address the structural causes of vulnerability faced by individuals in Chile.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: vulnerability, social protection, monetary subsidies, poverty reduction, Chile
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

References

Abadie, A., Drukker, Leber J. & Imbens, G. (2004). Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. Stata Journal, 4, 290–311.

Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. (2007) Bias corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Harvard University.

Agostini, C. & Brown, P. (2011). Cash transfers and poverty reduction in Chile. Journal of Regional Science, 51, 604–625

Agostini, C., Brown, P., & Góngora, D. (2010). Public finance, governance, and cash transfers in alleviating poverty and inequality in Chile. Public Budgeting & Finance, 30(2), 1-23

Agostini, C., Brown, P. & Góngora, D. (2008). Spatial distribution of poverty in Chile. Estudios de Economía, 25(1), 79-110.

Aguilar, O. (2002). Dinamica de la pobreza: resultados de la encuesta panel 1996-2001, Technical report, MIDEPLAN, Santiago, Chile.

Amemiya, T. (1977). The maximum likelihood estimator and the non-linear three stage least squares estimator in the general nonlinear simultaneous equation model. Econometrica, 45, 955-968.

Arellano, J. (2004). Políticas sociales para el crecimiento con equidad Chile 1990-2002. Serie Estudios Socio Economicos, No26, Santiago de Chile.

Bali, R and Floro, M. (2012). Assessing the Effect of Microfinance on Vulnerability and Poverty among Low Income Households. The Journal of Development Studies, 48:5, 605-618

Bendezú, L., Denis, A., Sánchez, C., Ugalde, P. & Zubizarreta, J. (2007). La encuesta panel CASEN: metodología y calidad de los datos. Versión 1.0. Report Observatorio Social Universidad Alberto Hurtado.

Becker, S. & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358-377.

Bourguignon, F. & Goh, C. (2004). Estimating individual vulnerability to poverty with pseudo-panel data. The World Bank, and DaeIl Kim, Seoul National University. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3375, Washington DC.

Bronfman, J. (2010). Measuring vulnerability in Chile using the panel national socio economic characteristics survey for 1996-2001-2006. Working Paper School of Public Affairs, American University, Washington DC.

Caliendo, M. & Kopeinig, S. (2005). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1588. Bonn, Germany.

Castro, R. & Kast, F. (2004). Movilidad de la pobreza en Chile. Análisis de la Encuesta Panel 1996 – 2001. Instituto Libertad y Desarrollo, Serie Informe Social, 85.

Chaudhuri, S., Jalan, J. & Suryahadi, A. (2002). Assessing household vulnerability to poverty from cross-sectional data: A methodology and estimates from Indonesia. Columbia University Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, 0102-52, New York.

Chaudhuri, S. (2003). Assessing vulnerability to poverty: concepts, empirical methods and illustrative examples. Department of Economics Columbia University. Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/97185/Keny_0304/Ke_0304/vulnerability-assessment.pdf.

Chronic Poverty Research Centre (2005). The Chronic poverty report 2004–05, Manchester, UK. Available at: http://cprc.abrc.co.uk/pdfs/CPRfinCOMPLETE.pdf.

Clert, C. & Wodon, Q. (2002). The targeting of government programs in Chile: a quantitative and qualitative assessment. in Chile’s High Growth Economy: Poverty and Income Distribution 1987-1998. World Bank Country Study, Washington, DC: World Bank. pp 143-166.

Contreras, D. (1996). Pobreza y desigualdad en Chile 1987-1992: Discurso, Metodología y Evidencia Empirica. Estudios Públicos, 65, 57-94

Contreras, D. (2001), Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction by Region: Chile 1990-96. Development Policy Review, 19, 291–302.

Contreras, D. (2003). Poverty and inequality in a rapid growth economy: Chile 1990-96. Journal of Development Studies, 39(3), 181-200.

Contreras, D., Cooper, R., Hermann, J. & Neilson, C. (2005). ¿Ha sido en crecimiento pro pobre en Chile? Presented at X Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reform del Estadi y de la Administración Pública, Santiago Chile, October 18-21.

Cruces, G., Gasparini, L., Bérgolo, M. & Ham, A. (2010). Vulnerability to poverty in Latin America. CEDLAS and CONICET, Report prepared for the Chronic Poverty Research Centre.

Dercon, Stefan (ed.) (2005). Insurance against poverty, Clarendon: Oxford University Press.

Dirección de Presupuesto, Gobieno de Chile. Estadísticas de las finanzas públicas, dipres. Available at: http://www.dipres.gob.cl/

The Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLAC), (2010). Statistical yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. United Nations. ISBN 978-92-1-021073-7. Glick, D., & Menon, N. (2009). Public programs pare poverty: Evidence from Chile. Bulletin of Economic Research, 61(3), 249-282.

Günther, I. & Harttgen, K. (2009). Estimating households vulnerability to idiosyncratic and covariate shocks: a novel method applied in Madagascar. World Development, 37(7), 1222-1234.

Heckman, J. and Hotz, J. (1989). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of training programmes (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(804), pp. 862–874.

Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P. (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64, pp. 605–654.

Ichino, A., Mealli, F. and Nannicini, T. (2007) From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: what can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(3), pp. 305–327.

Imai, K., Wang, X. & Kang, W. (2009). Poverty and vulnerability in rural China: effects of taxation. Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Working paper 156.

Imbens, G. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 4–29.

Jha, R. Imai, K. & Gaiha, R. (2009). Poverty undernutrition and vulnerability in rural India: public works versus food subsidy. Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Working paper 135.

Kamanou, G. and Morduch, J. (2005) Measuring vunerability to poverty, in: S. Dercon (ed.), Insurance Against Poverty (Oxford: Oxford University Press), chapter 8.

Larrañaga, O. (1994). Pobreza, crecimiento y desigualdad: Chile 1987-1992. Revista de Análisis Económico, 9 (2), 69-92.

Larrañaga, O. (2005). Focalización de programas en Chile: El sistema CAS. serie de documentos de discusión sobre la protección social, (0528)

Leuven, E. & Sianesi. B, (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.

López, R., & Miller, S. J. (2008). Chile: the unbearable burden of inequality. World Development, 36(12), 2679-2695.

Mideplan, (2010). Resultados de la Encuesta CASEN 2009. Available at: http://www.ministeriodesarrollosocial.gob.cl/casen2009/RESULTADOS_CASEN_2009.pdf

Nannicini, T. (2007). Simulation-based sensitivity analysis for matching estimators. Stata Journal, 7(3), 334.

Neilson, C., Contreras, D., Cooper, R. & Hermann, J. (2008). The Dynamics of poverty in Chile.” Journal of Latin American Studies, 40, 251–273.

Pizzolitto, G. (2005). Poverty and inequality in Chile: methodological issues and a literature review. CEDLAS, Working Papers 0020, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.

Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD) Chile, (2009). Análisis de la ecuesta panel CASEN. Programa Equidad, Santiago:UNDP.

Rodríguez, J. and Flores, L. (2010). Protección del gasto public social a través de la política fiscal: el caso de Chile. CEPAL - Serie Financiamiento del desarrollo No 224

Rodriguez, C., Dominguez, P., Undurraga, E., & Zubizarreta, J. (2008). Identificación y características de la población vulnerable: elementos para la introducción del riesgo. Chapter X on Camino al Bicentenario Propuestas para Chile, Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

Rosenbaum, P. (1987). Sensitivity analysis to certain permutation inferences in matched observational studies. Biometrika, 74(1), pp. 13–26.

Rosenbaum, P. & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.

Scott, C. (2000). Mixed fortunes: A study of poverty mobility among small farm households in Chile, 1968-86. Journal of Development Studies, 36(6), 155-180.

Smith, J. and Todd, P. (2005) Does matching address Lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125, pp. 305–353.

Solimano, A. (2009) Three Decades of Neo-liberal Economics in Chile: Achievements, Failures and Dilemmas. UNU-WIDER research paper No37

Waissbluth, M. (2005). La reforma del estado en chile 1990-2005 diagnóstico y propuestas de futuro. Serie Gestion 76 Santiago: Universidad de Chile, 2005. Available at http://www.dii.uchile.cl/~ceges/publicaciones/ceges76.pdf.

Weyland, K. (1999). Economic policy in Chile's new democracy. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 41(3), 67-96

Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Zhang, Y. and Wan, G. (2008). Can we predict vulnerability to poverty? United Nations University UNU-WIDER Research Paper 2008/82.

Zubizarreta, J. (2005). Dinámica de la pobreza: el caso de Chile 1996-2001. Unpublished Memoria para optar al título de Ingeniero Civil de Industrias, con Diploma en Ingeniería Matemática, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.