Student Study Choices in the Principles of Economics: A Case Study of Computer Usage

Grimes, Paul W. and Sanderson, Patricia L. and Ching, Geok H. (1996): Student Study Choices in the Principles of Economics: A Case Study of Computer Usage. Published in: Journal of Educational Computing Research , Vol. 16(1), (1997): pp. 65-81.

Abstract

Principles of Economics students at Mississippi State University were provided the opportunity to use computer assisted instruction (CAI) as a supplemental study activity. Students were free to choose the extent of their computer work. Throughout the course, weekly surveys were conducted to monitor the time each student spent with their textbook, computerized tutorials, workbook, class notes, and study groups. The surveys indicated that only a minority of the students actively pursued CAI. Probit and OLS models were estimated to identify the factors which determined the probability of computer use and the mean weekly time spent in CAI. The results indicated that black students spent significantly less time engaged in CAI but older students spent more time with the computer. Students with greater physical access to computers and students who had taken a formal course in computer operations spent more time each week in CAI. Further, students who highly rated the importance of CAI to their learning were more likely to be computer users and spend more time on task. The impact of CAI on student performance was estimated within the context of a "treatment effects" model which controlled for the self-selection of students into two categories of computer users. The results indicated that CAI did significantly improve end-of-course test performance, holding all else constant. Given the negligible use of CAI, the authors conclude that students failed to perceive the expected return to computer time or were willing to bear the opportunity cost of pursuing other study activities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Principles of Economics, Computers, CAI, Study Time, College Students, Learning
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A22 - Undergraduate

References

Bartlett R. and King P., Teaching economics as a laboratory science. Journal of Economic Education 21, 181-194 (1990).

Becker W. E., Economic education research: Part II, new directions in theoretical model building. Journal of Economic Education 14 4-10 (1983).

Becker W. E. and Walstad W. B., Econometric modeling in economic education research. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston (1987).

Gleason J. P. and Walstad W. B., An empirical test of an inventory model of student study time. Journal of Economic Education 19 315-321 (1988).

Greene W. H., Limdep version 6.0 - Users manual and reference guide. Econometric Software Incorporated, Bellport NY (1992).

Grimes P. W. and Ray M. A., Economics: Microcomputers in the college classroom - A review of the academic literature. Social Science Computer Review 11 452-463 (1993).

Kelley A. C., The student as utility maximizer. Journal of Economic Education 7 82-92 (1975).

Maxwell N. L. and Lopus J. S., The Lake Wobegon Effect in Student Self-Reported Data. American Economic Review 84 201-205 (1994).

Parkin M., Economics - Second Edition. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York (1993).

Ray M. A., Economics 2131: Computer laboratory in economics - a supplement to principles of economics. In Economic Education Experiences of Enterprising Teachers 141-148. Joint Council on Economic Education, New York (1991).

Saunders P., Test of understanding in college economics - Examiner's manual. Joint Council on Economic Education, New York (1991).

Schmidt R. M., Who maximizes what? A study in student time allocation. American Economic Review 73 23-27 (1983).